Alternatives to Testsigma logo

Alternatives to Testsigma

Selenium, JUnit, Cucumber, PHPUnit, and Mockito are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Testsigma.
4
20
+ 1
0

What is Testsigma and what are its top alternatives?

A Unified platform for Web, Mobile apps and API services' Automated Testing, It is test automation ecosystem with all the essential elements required for Agile & Continuous Delivery teams. Automated tests are written in simple English & involves no complex coding but with the flexibility that enterprise teams need. The tests can be run in parallel on thousands of device/OS/browser combos and physical mobile devices on a massive device cloud as well as on your local machines. It lets you drill down to specific test environments and identify what failed and why.
Testsigma is a tool in the Testing Frameworks category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Testsigma

  • Selenium

    Selenium

    Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well. ...

  • JUnit

    JUnit

    JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks. ...

  • Cucumber

    Cucumber

    Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs. ...

  • PHPUnit

    PHPUnit

    PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks. ...

  • Mockito

    Mockito

    It is a mocking framework that tastes really good. It lets you write beautiful tests with a clean & simple API. It doesn’t give you hangover because the tests are very readable and they produce clean verification errors. ...

  • RSpec

    RSpec

    Behaviour Driven Development for Ruby. Making TDD Productive and Fun.

  • pytest

    pytest

    A framework makes it easy to write small tests, yet scales to support complex functional testing for applications and libraries. It is a mature full-featured Python testing tool. ...

  • Capybara

    Capybara

    Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem. ...

Testsigma alternatives & related posts

Selenium logo

Selenium

11.3K
8.8K
520
Web Browser Automation
11.3K
8.8K
+ 1
520
PROS OF SELENIUM
  • 170
    Automates browsers
  • 154
    Testing
  • 101
    Essential tool for running test automation
  • 24
    Record-Playback
  • 24
    Remote Control
  • 8
    Data crawling
  • 7
    Supports end to end testing
  • 6
    Functional testing
  • 6
    Easy set up
  • 4
    The Most flexible monitoring system
  • 3
    Easy to integrate with build tools
  • 3
    End to End Testing
  • 2
    Integration Tests
  • 2
    Comparing the performance selenium is faster than jasm
  • 2
    Record and playback
  • 2
    Compatible with Python
  • 2
    Easy to scale
  • 0
    Integrated into Selenium-Jupiter framework
CONS OF SELENIUM
  • 7
    Flaky tests
  • 2
    Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)

related Selenium posts

Kamil Kowalski
Lead Architect at Fresha · | 27 upvotes · 1.2M views

When you think about test automation, it’s crucial to make it everyone’s responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.

See more
Benjamin Poon
QA Manager - Engineering at HBC Digital · | 8 upvotes · 770.9K views

For our digital QA organization to support a complex hybrid monolith/microservice architecture, our team took on the lofty goal of building out a commonized UI test automation framework. One of the primary requisites included a technical minimalist threshold such that an engineer or analyst with fundamental knowledge of JavaScript could automate their tests with greater ease. Just to list a few: - Nightwatchjs - Selenium - Cucumber - GitHub - Go.CD - Docker - ExpressJS - React - PostgreSQL

With this structure, we're able to combine the automation efforts of each team member into a centralized repository while also providing new relevant metrics to business owners.

See more
JUnit logo

JUnit

1.4K
466
0
A programmer-oriented testing framework for Java
1.4K
466
+ 1
0
PROS OF JUNIT
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF JUNIT
      Be the first to leave a con

      related JUnit posts

      We are looking for a Testing Tool that can integrate with Java/ React/ Go/ Python/ Node.js. Which amongst the three tools JUnit, NUnit & Selenium would be the best for this use case?

      See more
      Joshua Dean Küpper
      CEO at Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt) · | 1 upvote · 147.2K views

      We use JUnit for our Java Unit and Integration tests in Version 5. Combined with @JMockit2 and @truth (from Google) we perform all kinds of tests on our minecraft, standalone and microservice architecture.

      We prefer JUnit over TestNG because of the bigger community, better support and the generally more agile development. JUnit integrates nicely with most software, while TestNG support is a little more limited.

      See more
      Cucumber logo

      Cucumber

      742
      727
      32
      Simple, human collaboration.
      742
      727
      + 1
      32
      PROS OF CUCUMBER
      • 20
        Simple Syntax
      • 5
        Simple usage
      • 4
        Huge community
      • 3
        Nice report
      CONS OF CUCUMBER
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Cucumber posts

        Benjamin Poon
        QA Manager - Engineering at HBC Digital · | 8 upvotes · 770.9K views

        For our digital QA organization to support a complex hybrid monolith/microservice architecture, our team took on the lofty goal of building out a commonized UI test automation framework. One of the primary requisites included a technical minimalist threshold such that an engineer or analyst with fundamental knowledge of JavaScript could automate their tests with greater ease. Just to list a few: - Nightwatchjs - Selenium - Cucumber - GitHub - Go.CD - Docker - ExpressJS - React - PostgreSQL

        With this structure, we're able to combine the automation efforts of each team member into a centralized repository while also providing new relevant metrics to business owners.

        See more
        Sarah Elson
        Product Growth at LambdaTest · | 4 upvotes · 333.8K views

        @producthunt LambdaTest Selenium JavaScript Java Python PHP Cucumber TeamCity CircleCI With this new release of LambdaTest automation, you can run tests across an Online Selenium Grid of 2000+ browsers and OS combinations to perform cross browser testing. This saves you from the pain of maintaining the infrastructure and also saves you the licensing costs for browsers and operating systems. #testing #Seleniumgrid #Selenium #testautomation #automation #webdriver #producthunt hunted

        See more
        PHPUnit logo

        PHPUnit

        465
        225
        12
        Testing framework for PHP
        465
        225
        + 1
        12
        PROS OF PHPUNIT
        • 4
          TDD Unit Testing
        • 2
          TDD Integration Testing
        • 2
          TDD Acceptance Testing
        • 1
          Software Quality
        • 1
          TDD Unit Testing
        • 1
          Unit Testing
        • 1
          The de facto standard for xUnit testing in PHP
        CONS OF PHPUNIT
        • 1
          Mocked services require more effort and understanding

        related PHPUnit posts

        Shared insights
        on
        BehatBehatPHPUnitPHPUnit

        What is the best solution (PHPUnit or Behat) for test automation (unit and functional tests)?

        See more
        Mockito logo

        Mockito

        444
        123
        0
        Tasty mocking framework for unit tests in Java
        444
        123
        + 1
        0
        PROS OF MOCKITO
          Be the first to leave a pro
          CONS OF MOCKITO
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Mockito posts

            RSpec logo

            RSpec

            439
            165
            0
            Behaviour Driven Development for Ruby
            439
            165
            + 1
            0
            PROS OF RSPEC
              Be the first to leave a pro
              CONS OF RSPEC
                Be the first to leave a con

                related RSpec posts

                I'm working as one of the engineering leads in RunaHR. As our platform is a Saas, we thought It'd be good to have an API (We chose Ruby and Rails for this) and a SPA (built with React and Redux ) connected. We started the SPA with Create React App since It's pretty easy to start.

                We use Jest as the testing framework and react-testing-library to test React components. In Rails we make tests using RSpec.

                Our main database is PostgreSQL, but we also use MongoDB to store some type of data. We started to use Redis  for cache and other time sensitive operations.

                We have a couple of extra projects: One is an Employee app built with React Native and the other is an internal back office dashboard built with Next.js for the client and Python in the backend side.

                Since we have different frontend apps we have found useful to have Bit to document visual components and utils in JavaScript.

                See more
                Simon Bettison
                Managing Director at Bettison.org Limited · | 7 upvotes · 295.9K views

                In 2010 we made the very difficult decision to entirely re-engineer our existing monolithic LAMP application from the ground up in order to address some growing concerns about it's long term viability as a platform.

                Full application re-write is almost always never the answer, because of the risks involved. However the situation warranted drastic action as it was clear that the existing product was going to face severe scaling issues. We felt it better address these sooner rather than later and also take the opportunity to improve the international architecture and also to refactor the database in. order that it better matched the changes in core functionality.

                PostgreSQL was chosen for its reputation as being solid ACID compliant database backend, it was available as an offering AWS RDS service which reduced the management overhead of us having to configure it ourselves. In order to reduce read load on the primary database we implemented an Elasticsearch layer for fast and scalable search operations. Synchronisation of these indexes was to be achieved through the use of Sidekiq's Redis based background workers on Amazon ElastiCache. Again the AWS solution here looked to be an easy way to keep our involvement in managing this part of the platform at a minimum. Allowing us to focus on our core business.

                Rails ls was chosen for its ability to quickly get core functionality up and running, its MVC architecture and also its focus on Test Driven Development using RSpec and Selenium with Travis CI providing continual integration. We also liked Ruby for its terse, clean and elegant syntax. Though YMMV on that one!

                Unicorn was chosen for its continual deployment and reputation as a reliable application server, nginx for its reputation as a fast and stable reverse-proxy. We also took advantage of the Amazon CloudFront CDN here to further improve performance by caching static assets globally.

                We tried to strike a balance between having control over management and configuration of our core application with the convenience of being able to leverage AWS hosted services for ancillary functions (Amazon SES , Amazon SQS Amazon Route 53 all hosted securely inside Amazon VPC of course!).

                Whilst there is some compromise here with potential vendor lock in, the tasks being performed by these ancillary services are no particularly specialised which should mitigate this risk. Furthermore we have already containerised the stack in our development using Docker environment, and looking to how best to bring this into production - potentially using Amazon EC2 Container Service

                See more
                pytest logo

                pytest

                374
                208
                0
                A full-featured Python testing tool to help you write better programs
                374
                208
                + 1
                0
                PROS OF PYTEST
                  Be the first to leave a pro
                  CONS OF PYTEST
                    Be the first to leave a con

                    related pytest posts

                    Capybara logo

                    Capybara

                    268
                    174
                    15
                    Acceptance test framework for web applications
                    268
                    174
                    + 1
                    15
                    PROS OF CAPYBARA
                    • 12
                      Best acceptance test framework for Ruby on Rails apps
                    • 2
                      Synchronous with Rack::Test
                    • 1
                      Fast with Rack::Test
                    CONS OF CAPYBARA
                    • 1
                      Hard to make reproducible tests when using with browser

                    related Capybara posts