Alternatives to uno logo

Alternatives to uno

Xamarin, Log4j, Loki, Bunyan, and Seq are the most popular alternatives and competitors to uno.
18
31
+ 1
0

What is uno and what are its top alternatives?

We built uno, a small tool similar to uniq (the UNIX CLI tool that removes duplicates) - but with fuzziness. uno considers two lines to be equal if their edit distance is less than a specified threshold, by default set to 30%. It reads from stdin and prints the deduplicated lines to stdout.
uno is a tool in the Logging Tools category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to uno

  • Xamarin

    Xamarin

    Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch. ...

  • Log4j

    Log4j

    It is an open source logging framework. With this tool – logging behavior can be controlled by editing a configuration file only without touching the application binary and can be used to store the Selenium Automation flow logs. ...

  • Loki

    Loki

    Loki is a horizontally-scalable, highly-available, multi-tenant log aggregation system inspired by Prometheus. It is designed to be very cost effective and easy to operate, as it does not index the contents of the logs, but rather a set of labels for each log stream. ...

  • Bunyan

    Bunyan

    It is a simple and fast JSON logging module for node.js services. It has extensible streams system for controlling where log records go (to a stream, to a file, log file rotation, etc.) ...

  • Seq

    Seq

    Seq is a self-hosted server for structured log search, analysis, and alerting. It can be hosted on Windows or Linux/Docker, and has integrations for most popular structured logging libraries. ...

  • Castle Core

    Castle Core

    It provides common Castle Project abstractions including logging services. It also features Castle DynamicProxy a lightweight runtime proxy generator, and Castle DictionaryAdapter. ...

  • CocoaLumberjack

    CocoaLumberjack

    CocoaLumberjack is a fast & simple, yet powerful & flexible logging framework for Mac and iOS. ...

  • Zap

    Zap

    Zap takes a different approach. It includes a reflection-free, zero-allocation JSON encoder, and the base Logger strives to avoid serialization overhead and allocations wherever possible. By building the high-level SugaredLogger on that foundation, zap lets users choose when they need to count every allocation and when they'd prefer a more familiar, loosely typed API. ...

uno alternatives & related posts

Xamarin logo

Xamarin

1.1K
1.3K
758
Create iOS, Android and Mac apps in C#
1.1K
1.3K
+ 1
758
PROS OF XAMARIN
  • 119
    Power of c# on mobile devices
  • 79
    Native performance
  • 76
    Native apps with native ui controls
  • 70
    No javascript - truely compiled code
  • 66
    Sharing more than 90% of code over all platforms
  • 44
    Ability to leverage visual studio
  • 43
    Many great c# libraries
  • 42
    Mvvm pattern
  • 35
    Amazing support
  • 33
    Powerful platform for .net developers
  • 18
    GUI Native look and Feel
  • 14
    Nuget package manager
  • 11
    Free
  • 9
    Enables code reuse on server
  • 9
    Backed by Microsoft
  • 8
    Faster Development
  • 7
    It's free since Apr 2016
  • 7
    Best performance than other cross-platform
  • 7
    Easy Debug and Trace
  • 7
    Open Source
  • 7
    Use of third-party .NET libraries
  • 6
    Xamarin.forms is the best, it's amazing
  • 6
    Mac IDE (Xamarin Studio)
  • 5
    C# mult paradigm language
  • 4
    Microsoft backed
  • 4
    Microsoft stack
  • 4
    Power of C#, no javascript, visual studio
  • 4
    That just work for every scenario
  • 3
    Small learning curve for Mobile developers
  • 3
    Compatible to develop Hybrid apps
  • 3
    Great docs
  • 2
    Ionic
  • 2
    Well Designed
  • 1
    Ability to leverage legacy C and C++
CONS OF XAMARIN
  • 8
    Build times
  • 4
    Visual Studio
  • 3
    Complexity
  • 3
    Price
  • 3
    Scalability
  • 2
    Nuget
  • 2
    Build Tools
  • 2
    Maturity
  • 2
    Support
  • 0
    Maturidade
  • 0
    Performance

related Xamarin posts

Greg Neumann

Finding the most effective dev stack for a solo developer. Over the past year, I've been looking at many tech stacks that would be 'best' for me, as a solo, indie, developer to deliver a desktop app (Windows & Mac) plus mobile - iOS mainly. Initially, Xamarin started to stand-out. Using .NET Core as the run-time, Xamarin as the native API provider and Xamarin Forms for the UI seemed to solve all issues. But, the cracks soon started to appear. Xamarin Forms is mobile only; the Windows incarnation is different. There is no Mac UI solution (you have to code it natively in Mac OS Storyboard. I was also worried how Xamarin Forms , if I was to use it, was going to cope, in future, with Apple's new SwiftUI and Google's new Fuchsia.

This plethora of techs for the UI-layer made me reach for the safer waters of using Web-techs for the UI. Lovely! Consistency everywhere (well, mostly). But that consistency evaporates when platform issues are addressed. There are so many web frameworks!

But, I made a simple decision. It's just me...I am clever, but there is no army of coders here. And I have big plans for a business app. How could just 1 developer go-on to deploy a decent app to Windows, iPhone, iPad & Mac OS? I remembered earlier days when I've used Microsoft's ASP.NET to scaffold - generate - loads of Code for a web-app that I needed for several charities that I worked with. What 'generators' exist that do a lot of the platform-specific rubbish, allow the necessary customisation of such platform integration and provide a decent UI?

I've placed my colours to the Quasar Framework mast. Oh dear, that means Electron desktop apps doesn't it? Well, Ive had enough of loads of Developers saying that "the menus won't look native" or "it uses too much RAM" and so on. I've been using non-native UI-wrapped apps for ages - the date picker in Outlook on iOS is way better than the native date-picker and I'd been using it for years without getting hot under the collar about it. Developers do get so hung-up on things that busy Users hardly notice; don't you think?. As to the RAM usage issue; that's a bit true. But Users only really notice when an app uses so much RAM that the machine starts to page-out. Electron contributes towards that horizon but does not cause it. My Users will be business-users after all. Somewhat decent machines.

Looking forward to all that lovely Vue.js around my TypeScript and all those really, really, b e a u t I f u l UI controls of Quasar Framework . Still not sure that 1 dev can deliver all that... but I'm up for trying...

See more
William Miller
CEO at Stealth Startup · | 6 upvotes · 52.3K views

We are developing an AWS IoT app for large boats. The IoT devices have sensors all over the boat for engine oil pressure, position, water depth, fuel level, crew location, etc. When the boat has internet, we interact with AWS cloud using lambda and Amazon DynamoDB. When the boat is offshore, the captain and crew still need normal and emergency alerts and real-time sensor information. The crew might have an Android or IoS phone or a Windows or macOS PC to receive alerts and interact with sensors. We may use the AWS GreenGrasss edge computing solution and either MQTT or HTML for that function.

Question: We want to develop a cross-platform client to run on Windows, Mac, Android, IOS, and possibly Linux. We are primarily Python programmers, so PyQt or Kivy are options for us, but we have heard good things about React Native, Flutter, Xamarin, and others. We think an AWS Greengrass core on an RPI4 could communicate to the client with MQTT or a local webserver with a client web interface.

Any thoughts would be much appreciated.

See more
Log4j logo

Log4j

182
53
0
A Java-based logging utility
182
53
+ 1
0
PROS OF LOG4J
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF LOG4J
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Log4j posts

      Loki logo

      Loki

      119
      141
      9
      Like Prometheus, but for logs (by the makers of Grafana)
      119
      141
      + 1
      9
      PROS OF LOKI
      • 2
        Near real-time search
      • 2
        REST Api
      • 1
        Low resource footprint
      • 1
        Perfect fit for k8s
      • 1
        Smart way of tagging
      • 1
        Very fast ingestion
      • 1
        Opensource
      CONS OF LOKI
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Loki posts

        Bunyan logo

        Bunyan

        81
        14
        0
        A logging module for node.js services
        81
        14
        + 1
        0
        PROS OF BUNYAN
          Be the first to leave a pro
          CONS OF BUNYAN
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Bunyan posts

            Seq logo

            Seq

            43
            68
            13
            Log search, analysis, and alerting server built for modern structured log data
            43
            68
            + 1
            13
            PROS OF SEQ
            • 3
              Easy to use
            • 2
              Easy to install and configure
            • 2
              Flexible query language
            • 2
              Free unlimited one-person version
            • 2
              Beautiful charts and dashboards
            • 2
              Extensive plug-ins and integrations
            CONS OF SEQ
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Seq posts

              Castle Core logo

              Castle Core

              33
              2
              0
              It provides common Castle Project abstractions including logging services
              33
              2
              + 1
              0
              PROS OF CASTLE CORE
                Be the first to leave a pro
                CONS OF CASTLE CORE
                  Be the first to leave a con

                  related Castle Core posts

                  CocoaLumberjack logo

                  CocoaLumberjack

                  24
                  26
                  0
                  A fast & simple, yet powerful & flexible logging framework for Mac and iOS
                  24
                  26
                  + 1
                  0
                  PROS OF COCOALUMBERJACK
                    Be the first to leave a pro
                    CONS OF COCOALUMBERJACK
                      Be the first to leave a con

                      related CocoaLumberjack posts

                      Zap logo

                      Zap

                      9
                      27
                      0
                      Blazing fast, structured, leveled logging in Go (by Uber)
                      9
                      27
                      + 1
                      0
                      PROS OF ZAP
                        Be the first to leave a pro
                        CONS OF ZAP
                          Be the first to leave a con

                          related Zap posts