Alternatives to Vue Native logo

Alternatives to Vue Native

React Native, Vue.js, React, Flutter, and NativeScript are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Vue Native.
96
697
+ 1
57

What is Vue Native and what are its top alternatives?

Vue Native is a mobile framework to build truly native mobile app using Vue.js. Its is designed to connect React Native and Vue.js. Vue Native is a wrapper around React Native APIs, which allows you to use Vue.js and compose rich mobile User Interface.
Vue Native is a tool in the Cross-Platform Mobile Development category of a tech stack.
Vue Native is an open source tool with 8.4K GitHub stars and 314 GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Vue Native's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Vue Native

  • React Native

    React Native

    React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native. ...

  • Vue.js

    Vue.js

    It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API. ...

  • React

    React

    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project. ...

  • Flutter

    Flutter

    Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android. ...

  • NativeScript

    NativeScript

    NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms. ...

  • NativeScript-Vue

    NativeScript-Vue

    It is a NativeScript plugin which allows you to use Vue.js to craft your mobile application. It aims to have a syntax that you are used to from Vue.js. ...

  • Ionic

    Ionic

    Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript. ...

  • Xamarin

    Xamarin

    Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch. ...

Vue Native alternatives & related posts

React Native logo

React Native

23.1K
19.9K
1.1K
A framework for building native apps with React
23.1K
19.9K
+ 1
1.1K
PROS OF REACT NATIVE
  • 202
    Learn once write everywhere
  • 164
    Cross platform
  • 160
    Javascript
  • 116
    Native ios components
  • 66
    Built by facebook
  • 60
    Easy to learn
  • 43
    Bridges me into ios development
  • 39
    No compile
  • 39
    It's just react
  • 36
    Declarative
  • 20
    Fast
  • 12
    Livereload
  • 12
    Virtual Dom
  • 11
    Insanely fast develop / test cycle
  • 9
    Easy setup
  • 9
    Great community
  • 9
    Backed by Facebook
  • 9
    It is free and open source
  • 8
    Native android components
  • 7
    Highly customizable
  • 6
    Awesome
  • 6
    Scalable
  • 6
    Win win solution of hybrid app
  • 6
    Everything component
  • 6
    Great errors
  • 5
    Simple
  • 5
    Not dependent on anything such as Angular
  • 4
    OTA update
  • 4
    Awesome, easy starting from scratch
  • 3
    As good as Native without any performance concerns
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Web development meets Mobile development
  • 2
    'It's just react'
  • 2
    Many salary
  • 2
    Can be incrementally added to existing native apps
  • 2
    Hot reload
  • 2
    Over the air update (Flutter lacks)
  • 1
    Ngon
  • 1
    Nigger
  • 0
    Ful
CONS OF REACT NATIVE
  • 22
    Javascript
  • 18
    Built by facebook
  • 12
    Cant use CSS
  • 3
    30 FPS Limit
  • 2
    Some compenents not truly native
  • 1
    Generate large apk even for a simple app
  • 1
    Slow

related React Native posts

Vaibhav Taunk
Team Lead at Technovert · | 31 upvotes · 1.6M views

I am starting to become a full-stack developer, by choosing and learning .NET Core for API Development, Angular CLI / React for UI Development, MongoDB for database, as it a NoSQL DB and Flutter / React Native for Mobile App Development. Using Postman, Markdown and Visual Studio Code for development.

See more
Ganesa Vijayakumar
Full Stack Coder | Module Lead · | 19 upvotes · 2.5M views

I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

Thanks, Ganesa

See more
Vue.js logo

Vue.js

38.3K
30.3K
1.4K
A progressive framework for building user interfaces
38.3K
30.3K
+ 1
1.4K
PROS OF VUE.JS
  • 275
    Simple and easy to start with
  • 216
    Good documentation
  • 186
    Components
  • 123
    Simple the best
  • 95
    Simplified AngularJS
  • 81
    Reactive
  • 69
    Intuitive APIs
  • 48
    Javascript
  • 45
    Changed my front end coding life
  • 40
    Configuration is smooth
  • 28
    Easy to learn
  • 25
    So much fun to use
  • 20
    Progressive
  • 17
    Virtual dom
  • 13
    Faster than bulldogs on hot tarmac
  • 9
    It's magic
  • 8
    Best of Both Worlds
  • 8
    Component is template, javascript and style in one
  • 7
    Without misleading licenses
  • 7
    Perfomance
  • 7
    Application structure
  • 7
    Elegant design
  • 6
    Intuitive and easy to use
  • 5
    Light Weight
  • 4
    Easy to integrate to HTML by inline-templates
  • 4
    Good command line interface
  • 3
    Small learning curve
  • 3
    Like Angular only quicker to get started with
  • 3
    Customer Render ending eg to HTML
  • 2
    One-way data flow
  • 2
    Single file components
  • 2
    Intuitive
  • 2
    Lots of documentation
  • 2
    Component based
  • 2
    Bridge from Web Development to JS Development
  • 2
    Concise error messages
  • 2
    Logicless templates
  • 2
    Supports several template languages
  • 2
    High performance
  • 1
    GUI
CONS OF VUE.JS
  • 6
    Less Common Place
  • 3
    YXMLvsHTML Markup
  • 1
    Don't support fragments
  • 1
    Only support programatically multiple root nodes

related Vue.js posts

Johnny Bell
Shared insights
on
Vue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I've used both Vue.js and React and I would stick with React. I know that Vue.js seems easier to write and its much faster to pick up however as you mentioned above React has way more ready made components you can just plugin, and the community for React is very big.

It might be a bit more of a steep learning curve for your friend to learn React over Vue.js but I think in the long run its the better option.

See more
Shared insights
on
Vue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

See more
React logo

React

113.5K
91.2K
3.8K
A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
113.5K
91.2K
+ 1
3.8K
PROS OF REACT
  • 760
    Components
  • 652
    Virtual dom
  • 563
    Performance
  • 486
    Simplicity
  • 436
    Composable
  • 175
    Data flow
  • 159
    Declarative
  • 124
    Isn't an mvc framework
  • 113
    Reactive updates
  • 111
    Explicit app state
  • 32
    JSX
  • 23
    Learn once, write everywhere
  • 19
    Uni-directional data flow
  • 16
    Easy to Use
  • 14
    Works great with Flux Architecture
  • 10
    Great perfomance
  • 8
    Built by Facebook
  • 7
    Javascript
  • 5
    TypeScript support
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    Feels like the 90s
  • 4
    Scalable
  • 4
    Easy to start
  • 4
    Awesome
  • 3
    Fancy third party tools
  • 3
    Hooks
  • 3
    Functional
  • 3
    Server side views
  • 3
    Props
  • 2
    Rich ecosystem
  • 2
    Obama
  • 2
    Very gentle learning curve
  • 2
    Has functional components
  • 2
    Simple
  • 2
    Closer to standard JavaScript and HTML than others
  • 2
    Super easy
  • 2
    Has arrow functions
  • 2
    Strong Community
  • 2
    Great migration pathway for older systems
  • 2
    SSR
  • 2
    Fast evolving
  • 2
    Simple, easy to reason about and makes you productive
  • 2
    Excellent Documentation
  • 2
    Scales super well
  • 2
    Just the View of MVC
  • 2
    Server Side Rendering
  • 2
    Cross-platform
  • 1
    Fragments
  • 1
    Start simple
  • 1
    Every decision architecture wise makes sense
  • 1
    Permissively-licensed
  • 1
    Beautiful and Neat Component Management
  • 1
    Sdfsdfsdf
  • 1
    Allows creating single page applications
  • 1
    Split your UI into components with one true state
  • 1
    Sharable
CONS OF REACT
  • 35
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 23
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 21
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 8
    JSX
  • 7
    Not enterprise friendly
  • 4
    One-way binding only
  • 2
    State consistency with backend neglected
  • 2
    Bad Documentation

related React posts

Vaibhav Taunk
Team Lead at Technovert · | 31 upvotes · 1.6M views

I am starting to become a full-stack developer, by choosing and learning .NET Core for API Development, Angular CLI / React for UI Development, MongoDB for database, as it a NoSQL DB and Flutter / React Native for Mobile App Development. Using Postman, Markdown and Visual Studio Code for development.

See more
Adebayo Akinlaja
Engineering Manager at Andela · | 26 upvotes · 785.9K views

I picked up an idea to develop and it was no brainer I had to go with React for the frontend. I was faced with challenges when it came to what component framework to use. I had worked extensively with Material-UI but I needed something different that would offer me wider range of well customized components (I became pretty slow at styling). I brought in Evergreen after several sampling and reads online but again, after several prototype development against Evergreen—since I was using TypeScript and I had to import custom Type, it felt exhaustive. After I validated Evergreen with the designs of the idea I was developing, I also noticed I might have to do a lot of styling. I later stumbled on Material Kit, the one specifically made for React . It was promising with beautifully crafted components, most of which fits into the designs pages I had on ground.

A major problem of Material Kit for me is it isn't written in TypeScript and there isn't any plans to support its TypeScript version. I rolled up my sleeve and started converting their components to TypeScript and if you'll ask me, I am still on it.

In summary, I used the Create React App with TypeScript support and I am spending some time converting Material Kit to TypeScript before I start developing against it. All of these components are going to be hosted on Bit.

If you feel I am crazy or I have gotten something wrong, I'll be willing to listen to your opinion. Also, if you want to have a share of whatever TypeScript version of Material Kit I end up coming up with, let me know.

See more
Flutter logo

Flutter

7.9K
8.3K
919
Cross-platform mobile framework from Google
7.9K
8.3K
+ 1
919
PROS OF FLUTTER
  • 111
    Hot Reload
  • 90
    Performance
  • 90
    Cross platform
  • 73
    Backed by Google
  • 61
    Compiled into Native Code
  • 46
    Open Source
  • 45
    Fast Development
  • 42
    Fast Prototyping
  • 41
    Expressive and Flexible UI
  • 34
    Single Codebase
  • 32
    Reactive Programming
  • 26
    Material Design
  • 21
    Widget-based
  • 21
    Target to Fuchsia
  • 20
    Dart
  • 15
    IOS + Android
  • 12
    Easy to learn
  • 12
    Great CLI Support
  • 12
    Tooling
  • 11
    You can use it as mobile, web, Server development
  • 10
    Have built-in Material theme
  • 9
    Debugging quickly
  • 9
    Support by multiple IDE: Android Studio, VS Code, XCode
  • 8
    Community
  • 8
    Target to Android
  • 8
    Easy Testing Support
  • 7
    Good docs & sample code
  • 7
    Have built-in Cupertino theme
  • 7
    Written by Dart, which is easy to read code
  • 7
    Target to iOS
  • 6
    Easy to Widget Test
  • 6
    Flutter is awesome
  • 6
    Real platform free framework of the future
  • 6
    Easy to Unit Test
CONS OF FLUTTER
  • 28
    Need to learn Dart
  • 10
    No 3D Graphics Engine Support
  • 9
    Lack of community support
  • 6
    Graphics programming
  • 6
    Lack of friendly documentation
  • 2
    Lack of promotion
  • 1
    Https://iphtechnologies.com/difference-between-flutter

related Flutter posts

Vaibhav Taunk
Team Lead at Technovert · | 31 upvotes · 1.6M views

I am starting to become a full-stack developer, by choosing and learning .NET Core for API Development, Angular CLI / React for UI Development, MongoDB for database, as it a NoSQL DB and Flutter / React Native for Mobile App Development. Using Postman, Markdown and Visual Studio Code for development.

See more

I've been juggling with an app idea and am clueless about how to build it.

A little about the app:

  • Social network type app ,
  • Users can create different directories, in those directories post images and/or text that'll be shared on a public dashboard .

Directory creation is the main point of this app. Besides there'll be rooms(groups),chatting system, search operations similar to instagram,push notifications

I have two options:

  1. React Native, Python, AWS stack or
  2. Flutter, Go ( I don't know what stack or tools to use)
See more
NativeScript logo

NativeScript

504
993
516
Build truly native apps with JavaScript
504
993
+ 1
516
PROS OF NATIVESCRIPT
  • 75
    Access to the entire native api
  • 47
    Support for native ios and android libraries
  • 46
    Support for javascript libraries
  • 46
    Angular 2.0 support
  • 44
    Native ux and performance
  • 37
    Typescript support
  • 35
    Backed up by google and telerik
  • 29
    Css support
  • 27
    Cross-platform declarative ui and code
  • 25
    Fully open source under apache 2.0 license
  • 11
    Vuejs support
  • 9
    60fps performance
  • 6
    Powerful data visualization with native UI
  • 5
    Angular, typescript and javascript support
  • 5
    VS Code integration
  • 5
    No need for Mac to build iOS apps in Telerik Platform
  • 4
    Extended CLI support
  • 4
    Cloud builds as part of Telerik PLatform
  • 4
    Truly Object-Oriented with Typescript
  • 4
    On-device debugging
  • 4
    Extensibility
  • 3
    Easy to learn
  • 3
    0 day support for new OS updates
  • 3
    Easiest of all other frameworks
  • 3
    Live reload
  • 3
    Backed by google
  • 3
    Access to entire native api
  • 3
    Publishing modules to NPM
  • 2
    Vue.js support out of the box
  • 2
    VueJS support
  • 2
    Svelte support
  • 2
    Powerfull mobile services as part of Telerik Platform
  • 2
    Native ui with angular
  • 2
    Vue support
  • 1
    Playground
  • 1
    Hot Reload
  • 1
    HMR via webpack
  • 1
    Very small app size
  • 1
    Write once, use anywhere
  • 1
    Easy to use, support for almost all npm packages
  • 1
    Rich ecosystem
  • 1
    Compile to Apple/Google Stores via CloudCompiler
  • 1
    Has CSS ;-)
  • 1
    It works with Angular
  • 1
    Code reuse with your website
  • 0
    Dart
CONS OF NATIVESCRIPT
  • 5
    Lack of promotion
  • 1
    Slower Performance compared to competitors

related NativeScript posts

leonardo silveira
Software Engineer at Casa Magalhães · | 5 upvotes · 185.3K views

So, i am preparing to adopt NativeScript.

For years my hybrid projects used Apache Cordova.

"Let's avoid to maintain two teams and double the deliver velocity".

It was good for a few years, we had those september issues, (i.e. apple broke some backward compatibility) , but for the last years, things seems to be losing the grip faster.

Last breaking changes, for instance, seems to have a workaround, however that growing feeling that simple things can not rely on so fragile webviews keeps growing faster and faster.

I've tested nativescript not only on it's "helloworld", but also on how do they respond on issues.

I got tweed support. I opened an github issue and got answers on less than 10 hours (yes i did it on another timezone and very close to a weekend). I saw the faulty docs get corrected in two days.

The bad news is i only can adopt nativescript on newer projects, since there is no budget to revamp the current solutions.

The good news is i can keep coding on Vue.js , without vou router, but that's ok. I've already exchanged vanilla html for real native app with background magic enabled, the router can be easily reproduced.

See more
NativeScript-Vue logo

NativeScript-Vue

51
112
0
Truly native apps using Vue.js and NativeScript
51
112
+ 1
0
PROS OF NATIVESCRIPT-VUE
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF NATIVESCRIPT-VUE
      Be the first to leave a con

      related NativeScript-Vue posts

      Ionic logo

      Ionic

      7.2K
      6.6K
      1.7K
      A beautiful front-end framework for developing cross-platform apps with web technologies like Angular and React.
      7.2K
      6.6K
      + 1
      1.7K
      PROS OF IONIC
      • 246
        Allows for rapid prototyping
      • 226
        Hybrid mobile
      • 208
        It's angularjs
      • 184
        Free
      • 178
        It's javascript, html, and css
      • 108
        Ui and theming
      • 76
        Great designs
      • 74
        Mv* pattern
      • 70
        Reuse frontend devs on mobile
      • 64
        Extensibility
      • 31
        Great community
      • 28
        Open source
      • 22
        Responsive design
      • 20
        Good cli
      • 13
        Angularjs-based
      • 13
        Beautifully designed
      • 13
        So easy to use
      • 12
        Widgets
      • 11
        Allows for rapid prototyping, hybrid mobile
      • 11
        Typescript
      • 10
        Quick prototyping, amazing community
      • 10
        Easy setup
      • 8
        Angular2 support
      • 7
        Fast, easy, free
      • 7
        Because of the productivity and easy for development
      • 7
        So much thought behind what developers actually need
      • 7
        Base on angular
      • 6
        Super fast, their dev team is amazingly passionate
      • 6
        Easy to use
      • 6
        It's Angular
      • 4
        UI is awesome
      • 4
        Hot deploy
      • 3
        Material design support using theme
      • 3
        Amazing support
      • 3
        It's the future
      • 3
        Angular
      • 3
        Allow for rapid prototyping
      • 3
        Easy setup, development and testing
      • 3
        Ionic creator
      • 2
        User Friendly
      • 2
        It's angular js
      • 2
        Complete package
      • 2
        Simple & Fast
      • 2
        Fastest growing mobile app framework
      • 2
        Best Support and Community
      • 2
        Material Design By Default
      • 2
        Cross platform
      • 2
        Documentation
      • 2
        Because I can use my existing web devloper skills
      • 2
        Removes 300ms delay in mobile browsers
      • 1
        1
      • 1
        Native access
      • 1
        Typescript support
      • 1
        Ionic conect codeigniter
      • 1
        Fast Prototyping
      • 1
        All Trending Stack
      CONS OF IONIC
      • 20
        Not suitable for high performance or UI intensive apps
      • 15
        Not meant for game development
      • 2
        Not a native app

      related Ionic posts

      Saber Hosney
      Senior software engineer at Shortcut · | 7 upvotes · 66K views

      Greetings!

      I have been searching lately for frameworks to build mobile apps.

      We are trying to make something like a quiz app as a way for customers to contact us. I considered Ionic and React Native because we use JavaScript most of the time in websites, e.g., Vue.js/Nuxt.js. But Flutter seems a decent choice as well, especially since you can use Android/iOS-like components. We are looking for something that works in the long term, something that's time and cost-effective, especially when paired with backend services like Firebase or a GraphQL server. I would like to know your opinions and recommendations. Thank you!

      See more
      Melanie Verstraete
      Shared insights
      on
      IonicIonicFlutterFlutter

      Hi community, I am looking into how I should build my tech stack for a business/analytics platform. I am not very familiar with frontend development; when looking into cross-platform frameworks, I found a lot of options. What is the best cross-platform frontend framework to go with? I found Flutter interesting, but Ionic also looks promising? Thank you for the advice!

      See more
      Xamarin logo

      Xamarin

      1.2K
      1.4K
      775
      Create iOS, Android and Mac apps in C#
      1.2K
      1.4K
      + 1
      775
      PROS OF XAMARIN
      • 120
        Power of c# on mobile devices
      • 80
        Native performance
      • 77
        Native apps with native ui controls
      • 71
        No javascript - truely compiled code
      • 67
        Sharing more than 90% of code over all platforms
      • 45
        Ability to leverage visual studio
      • 44
        Many great c# libraries
      • 43
        Mvvm pattern
      • 36
        Amazing support
      • 34
        Powerful platform for .net developers
      • 19
        GUI Native look and Feel
      • 15
        Nuget package manager
      • 11
        Free
      • 9
        Backed by Microsoft
      • 9
        Enables code reuse on server
      • 8
        Faster Development
      • 7
        Open Source
      • 7
        It's free since Apr 2016
      • 7
        Use of third-party .NET libraries
      • 7
        Best performance than other cross-platform
      • 7
        Easy Debug and Trace
      • 6
        Xamarin.forms is the best, it's amazing
      • 6
        Mac IDE (Xamarin Studio)
      • 5
        Power of C#, no javascript, visual studio
      • 5
        C# mult paradigm language
      • 4
        Microsoft backed
      • 4
        Great docs
      • 4
        Compatible to develop Hybrid apps
      • 4
        Microsoft stack
      • 4
        That just work for every scenario
      • 3
        Small learning curve for Mobile developers
      • 3
        Well Designed
      • 2
        Ability to leverage legacy C and C++
      • 2
        Ionic
      CONS OF XAMARIN
      • 8
        Build times
      • 5
        Visual Studio
      • 3
        Scalability
      • 3
        Complexity
      • 3
        Price
      • 2
        Nuget
      • 2
        Maturity
      • 2
        Build Tools
      • 2
        Support
      • 0
        Maturidade
      • 0
        Performance

      related Xamarin posts

      Greg Neumann
      Indie, Solo, Developer · | 8 upvotes · 833K views

      Finding the most effective dev stack for a solo developer. Over the past year, I've been looking at many tech stacks that would be 'best' for me, as a solo, indie, developer to deliver a desktop app (Windows & Mac) plus mobile - iOS mainly. Initially, Xamarin started to stand-out. Using .NET Core as the run-time, Xamarin as the native API provider and Xamarin Forms for the UI seemed to solve all issues. But, the cracks soon started to appear. Xamarin Forms is mobile only; the Windows incarnation is different. There is no Mac UI solution (you have to code it natively in Mac OS Storyboard. I was also worried how Xamarin Forms , if I was to use it, was going to cope, in future, with Apple's new SwiftUI and Google's new Fuchsia.

      This plethora of techs for the UI-layer made me reach for the safer waters of using Web-techs for the UI. Lovely! Consistency everywhere (well, mostly). But that consistency evaporates when platform issues are addressed. There are so many web frameworks!

      But, I made a simple decision. It's just me...I am clever, but there is no army of coders here. And I have big plans for a business app. How could just 1 developer go-on to deploy a decent app to Windows, iPhone, iPad & Mac OS? I remembered earlier days when I've used Microsoft's ASP.NET to scaffold - generate - loads of Code for a web-app that I needed for several charities that I worked with. What 'generators' exist that do a lot of the platform-specific rubbish, allow the necessary customisation of such platform integration and provide a decent UI?

      I've placed my colours to the Quasar Framework mast. Oh dear, that means Electron desktop apps doesn't it? Well, Ive had enough of loads of Developers saying that "the menus won't look native" or "it uses too much RAM" and so on. I've been using non-native UI-wrapped apps for ages - the date picker in Outlook on iOS is way better than the native date-picker and I'd been using it for years without getting hot under the collar about it. Developers do get so hung-up on things that busy Users hardly notice; don't you think?. As to the RAM usage issue; that's a bit true. But Users only really notice when an app uses so much RAM that the machine starts to page-out. Electron contributes towards that horizon but does not cause it. My Users will be business-users after all. Somewhat decent machines.

      Looking forward to all that lovely Vue.js around my TypeScript and all those really, really, b e a u t I f u l UI controls of Quasar Framework . Still not sure that 1 dev can deliver all that... but I'm up for trying...

      See more
      William Miller

      We are developing an AWS IoT app for large boats. The IoT devices have sensors all over the boat for engine oil pressure, position, water depth, fuel level, crew location, etc. When the boat has internet, we interact with AWS cloud using lambda and Amazon DynamoDB. When the boat is offshore, the captain and crew still need normal and emergency alerts and real-time sensor information. The crew might have an Android or IoS phone or a Windows or macOS PC to receive alerts and interact with sensors. We may use the AWS GreenGrasss edge computing solution and either MQTT or HTML for that function.

      Question: We want to develop a cross-platform client to run on Windows, Mac, Android, IOS, and possibly Linux. We are primarily Python programmers, so PyQt or Kivy are options for us, but we have heard good things about React Native, Flutter, Xamarin, and others. We think an AWS Greengrass core on an RPI4 could communicate to the client with MQTT or a local webserver with a client web interface.

      Any thoughts would be much appreciated.

      See more