Alternatives to Vue Router logo

Alternatives to Vue Router

vuex, React Router, axios, Nuxt.js, and jQuery are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Vue Router.
316
230
+ 1
0

What is Vue Router and what are its top alternatives?

It is the official router for Vue.js. It deeply integrates with Vue.js core to make building Single Page Applications with Vue.js a breeze.
Vue Router is a tool in the JavaScript Framework Components category of a tech stack.
Vue Router is an open source tool with 19K GitHub stars and 5K GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Vue Router's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Vue Router

  • vuex
    vuex

    Vuex is a state management pattern + library for Vue.js applications. It serves as a centralized store for all the components in an application, with rules ensuring that the state can only be mutated in a predictable fashion. It also integrates with Vue's official devtools extension to provide advanced features such as zero-config time-travel debugging and state snapshot export / import. ...

  • React Router
    React Router

    React Router is a complete routing solution designed specifically for React.js. It painlessly synchronizes the components of your application with the URL, with first-class support for nesting, transitions, and server side rendering. ...

  • axios
    axios

    It is a Javascript library used to make http requests from node.js or XMLHttpRequests from the browser and it supports the Promise API that is native to JS ES6. ...

  • Nuxt.js
    Nuxt.js

    Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more. ...

  • jQuery
    jQuery

    jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML. ...

  • React
    React

    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project. ...

  • AngularJS
    AngularJS

    AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding. ...

  • Vue.js
    Vue.js

    It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API. ...

Vue Router alternatives & related posts

vuex logo

vuex

1.5K
7
Centralized State Management for Vue.js.
1.5K
7
PROS OF VUEX
  • 2
    Debugging
  • 2
    Zero-config time-travel
  • 2
    Centralized State Management
  • 1
    Easy to setup
CONS OF VUEX
    Be the first to leave a con

    related vuex posts

    Simon Reymann
    Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 24 upvotes · 5M views

    Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

    • Nuxt.js consisting of Vue CLI, Vue Router, vuex, Webpack and Sass (Bundler for HTML5, CSS 3), Babel (Transpiler for JavaScript),
    • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed Vue.js components
    • Vuetify as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
    • TypeScript as programming language
    • Apollo / GraphQL (incl. GraphiQL) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
    • ESLint, TSLint and Prettier for coding style and code analyzes
    • Jest as testing framework
    • Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icon toolkit
    • NativeScript-Vue for mobile development

    The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

    • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
    • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
    • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
    • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
    • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
    • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
    See more
    Tim Nolet

    Heroku Docker GitHub Node.js hapi Vue.js AWS Lambda Amazon S3 PostgreSQL Knex.js Checkly is a fairly young company and we're still working hard to find the correct mix of product features, price and audience.

    We are focussed on tech B2B, but I always wanted to serve solo developers too. So I decided to make a $7 plan.

    Why $7? Simply put, it seems to be a sweet spot for tech companies: Heroku, Docker, Github, Appoptics (Librato) all offer $7 plans. They must have done a ton of research into this, so why not piggy back that and try it out.

    Enough biz talk, onto tech. The challenges were:

    • Slice of a portion of the functionality so a $7 plan is still profitable. We call this the "plan limits"
    • Update API and back end services to handle and enforce plan limits.
    • Update the UI to kindly state plan limits are in effect on some part of the UI.
    • Update the pricing page to reflect all changes.
    • Keep the actual processing backend, storage and API's as untouched as possible.

    In essence, we went from strictly volume based pricing to value based pricing. Here come the technical steps & decisions we made to get there.

    1. We updated our PostgreSQL schema so plans now have an array of "features". These are string constants that represent feature toggles.
    2. The Vue.js frontend reads these from the vuex store on login.
    3. Based on these values, the UI has simple v-if statements to either just show the feature or show a friendly "please upgrade" button.
    4. The hapi API has a hook on each relevant API endpoint that checks whether a user's plan has the feature enabled, or not.

    Side note: We offer 10 SMS messages per month on the developer plan. However, we were not actually counting how many people were sending. We had to update our alerting daemon (that runs on Heroku and triggers SMS messages via AWS SNS) to actually bump a counter.

    What we build is basically feature-toggling based on plan features. It is very extensible for future additions. Our scheduling and storage backend that actually runs users' monitoring requests (AWS Lambda) and stores the results (S3 and Postgres) has no knowledge of all of this and remained unchanged.

    Hope this helps anyone building out their SaaS and is in a similar situation.

    See more
    React Router logo

    React Router

    3.4K
    14
    A complete routing solution for React.js
    3.4K
    14
    PROS OF REACT ROUTER
    • 14
      Because there's not alternative
    CONS OF REACT ROUTER
      Be the first to leave a con

      related React Router posts

      Ganesa Vijayakumar
      Full Stack Coder | Technical Architect · | 19 upvotes · 5.7M views

      I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

      I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

      As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

      UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

      Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

      Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

      Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

      Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

      Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

      Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

      Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

      Thanks, Ganesa

      See more

      I just finished tweaking styles details of my hobby project MovieGeeks (https://moviegeeks.co/): The minimalist Online Movie Catalog

      This time I want to share my thoughts on the Tech-Stack I decided to use on the Frontend: React, React Router, Material-UI and React-Apollo:

      1. React is by far the Front-End "framework" with the biggest community. Some of the newest features like Suspense and Hooks makes it even more awesome and gives you even more power to write clean UI's

      2. Material UI is a very solid and stable set of react components that not only look good, but also are easy to use and customize. This was my first time using this library and I am very happy with the result

      3. React-Apollo in my opinion is the best GraphQL client for a React application. Easy to use and understand and it gives you awesome features out of the box like cache. With libraries like react-apollo-hooks you can even use it with the hooks api which makes the code cleaner and easier to follow.

      Any feedback is much appreciated :)

      See more
      axios logo

      axios

      3.4K
      0
      Promise based HTTP client for the browser and node.js
      3.4K
      0
      PROS OF AXIOS
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF AXIOS
          Be the first to leave a con

          related axios posts

          I built a project using Quasar Framework with Vue.js, vuex and axios on the frontend and Go, Gin Gonic and PostgreSQL on the backend. Deployment was realized using Docker and Docker Compose. Now I can build the desktop and the mobile app using a single code base on the frontend. UI responsiveness and performance of this stack is amazing.

          See more
          Shared insights
          on
          Vue RouterVue Routeraxiosaxios

          hello, I'm a newbie. is axios the same as Vue Router? Or can /should use both? thanks

          See more
          Nuxt.js logo

          Nuxt.js

          2K
          371
          The Vue.js Framework
          2K
          371
          PROS OF NUXT.JS
          • 61
            SSR
          • 47
            Automatic routes
          • 33
            Middleware
          • 29
            Hot code reloading
          • 22
            Easy setup, easy to use, great community, FRENCH TOUCH
          • 22
            SPA
          • 21
            Static Websites
          • 20
            Code splitting for every page
          • 19
            Plugins
          • 18
            Custom layouts
          • 15
            Automatic transpilation and bundling (with webpack and
          • 13
            Modules ecosystem
          • 13
            Easy setup
          • 11
            Pages directory
          • 11
            Amazing Developer Experience
          • 11
            Vibrant and helpful community
          • 5
            Its Great for Team Development
          CONS OF NUXT.JS
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Nuxt.js posts

            Simon Reymann
            Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 24 upvotes · 5M views

            Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

            • Nuxt.js consisting of Vue CLI, Vue Router, vuex, Webpack and Sass (Bundler for HTML5, CSS 3), Babel (Transpiler for JavaScript),
            • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed Vue.js components
            • Vuetify as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
            • TypeScript as programming language
            • Apollo / GraphQL (incl. GraphiQL) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
            • ESLint, TSLint and Prettier for coding style and code analyzes
            • Jest as testing framework
            • Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icon toolkit
            • NativeScript-Vue for mobile development

            The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

            • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
            • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
            • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
            • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
            • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
            • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
            See more
            Nikolaj Ivancic

            I want to build a documentation tool - functionally equivalent to MkDocs. The initial choice ought to be VuePress - but I know of at least one respectable developer who started with VuePress and switched to Nuxt.js. A rich set of "themes" is a plus and all documents ought to be in Markdown.

            Any opinions?

            See more
            jQuery logo

            jQuery

            192.9K
            6.6K
            The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.
            192.9K
            6.6K
            PROS OF JQUERY
            • 1.3K
              Cross-browser
            • 957
              Dom manipulation
            • 809
              Power
            • 660
              Open source
            • 610
              Plugins
            • 459
              Easy
            • 395
              Popular
            • 350
              Feature-rich
            • 281
              Html5
            • 227
              Light weight
            • 93
              Simple
            • 84
              Great community
            • 79
              CSS3 Compliant
            • 69
              Mobile friendly
            • 67
              Fast
            • 43
              Intuitive
            • 42
              Swiss Army knife for webdev
            • 35
              Huge Community
            • 11
              Easy to learn
            • 4
              Clean code
            • 3
              Because of Ajax request :)
            • 2
              Powerful
            • 2
              Nice
            • 2
              Just awesome
            • 2
              Used everywhere
            • 1
              Improves productivity
            • 1
              Javascript
            • 1
              Easy Setup
            • 1
              Open Source, Simple, Easy Setup
            • 1
              It Just Works
            • 1
              Industry acceptance
            • 1
              Allows great manipulation of HTML and CSS
            • 1
              Widely Used
            • 1
              I love jQuery
            CONS OF JQUERY
            • 6
              Large size
            • 5
              Sometimes inconsistent API
            • 5
              Encourages DOM as primary data source
            • 2
              Live events is overly complex feature

            related jQuery posts

            Kir Shatrov
            Engineering Lead at Shopify · | 22 upvotes · 2.5M views

            The client-side stack of Shopify Admin has been a long journey. It started with HTML templates, jQuery and Prototype. We moved to Batman.js, our in-house Single-Page-Application framework (SPA), in 2013. Then, we re-evaluated our approach and moved back to statically rendered HTML and vanilla JavaScript. As the front-end ecosystem matured, we felt that it was time to rethink our approach again. Last year, we started working on moving Shopify Admin to React and TypeScript.

            Many things have changed since the days of jQuery and Batman. JavaScript execution is much faster. We can easily render our apps on the server to do less work on the client, and the resources and tooling for developers are substantially better with React than we ever had with Batman.

            #FrameworksFullStack #Languages

            See more
            Ganesa Vijayakumar
            Full Stack Coder | Technical Architect · | 19 upvotes · 5.7M views

            I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

            I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

            As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

            UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

            Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

            Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

            Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

            Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

            Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

            Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

            Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

            Thanks, Ganesa

            See more
            React logo

            React

            175.2K
            4.1K
            A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
            175.2K
            4.1K
            PROS OF REACT
            • 837
              Components
            • 673
              Virtual dom
            • 578
              Performance
            • 509
              Simplicity
            • 442
              Composable
            • 186
              Data flow
            • 166
              Declarative
            • 128
              Isn't an mvc framework
            • 120
              Reactive updates
            • 115
              Explicit app state
            • 50
              JSX
            • 29
              Learn once, write everywhere
            • 22
              Easy to Use
            • 21
              Uni-directional data flow
            • 17
              Works great with Flux Architecture
            • 11
              Great perfomance
            • 10
              Javascript
            • 9
              Built by Facebook
            • 8
              TypeScript support
            • 6
              Speed
            • 6
              Server Side Rendering
            • 6
              Scalable
            • 5
              Easy to start
            • 5
              Feels like the 90s
            • 5
              Awesome
            • 5
              Props
            • 5
              Cross-platform
            • 5
              Closer to standard JavaScript and HTML than others
            • 5
              Easy as Lego
            • 5
              Functional
            • 5
              Excellent Documentation
            • 5
              Hooks
            • 4
              Scales super well
            • 4
              Allows creating single page applications
            • 4
              Sdfsdfsdf
            • 4
              Start simple
            • 4
              Strong Community
            • 4
              Super easy
            • 4
              Server side views
            • 4
              Fancy third party tools
            • 3
              Rich ecosystem
            • 3
              Has arrow functions
            • 3
              Very gentle learning curve
            • 3
              Beautiful and Neat Component Management
            • 3
              Just the View of MVC
            • 3
              Simple, easy to reason about and makes you productive
            • 3
              Fast evolving
            • 3
              SSR
            • 3
              Great migration pathway for older systems
            • 3
              Simple
            • 3
              Has functional components
            • 3
              Every decision architecture wise makes sense
            • 2
              Sharable
            • 2
              Permissively-licensed
            • 2
              HTML-like
            • 2
              Image upload
            • 2
              Recharts
            • 2
              Fragments
            • 2
              Split your UI into components with one true state
            • 1
              React hooks
            • 1
              Datatables
            CONS OF REACT
            • 41
              Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
            • 30
              No predefined way to structure your app
            • 29
              Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
            • 13
              JSX
            • 10
              Not enterprise friendly
            • 6
              One-way binding only
            • 3
              State consistency with backend neglected
            • 3
              Bad Documentation
            • 2
              Error boundary is needed
            • 2
              Paradigms change too fast

            related React posts

            Johnny Bell

            I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go.

            I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free!

            I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling.

            Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting. I did some research and I found Netlify. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.

            Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master.

            With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent.

            If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost.

            See more
            Collins Ogbuzuru
            Front-end dev at Evolve credit · | 48 upvotes · 348K views

            Your tech stack is solid for building a real-time messaging project.

            React and React Native are excellent choices for the frontend, especially if you want to have both web and mobile versions of your application share code.

            ExpressJS is an unopinionated framework that affords you the flexibility to use it's features at your term, which is a good start. However, I would recommend you explore Sails.js as well. Sails.js is built on top of Express.js and it provides additional features out of the box, especially the Websocket integration that your project requires.

            Don't forget to set up Graphql codegen, this would improve your dev experience (Add Typescript, if you can too).

            I don't know much about databases but you might want to consider using NO-SQL. I used Firebase real-time db and aws dynamo db on a few of my personal projects and I love they're easy to work with and offer more flexibility for a chat application.

            See more
            AngularJS logo

            AngularJS

            61.3K
            5.3K
            Superheroic JavaScript MVW Framework
            61.3K
            5.3K
            PROS OF ANGULARJS
            • 889
              Quick to develop
            • 589
              Great mvc
            • 573
              Powerful
            • 520
              Restful
            • 505
              Backed by google
            • 349
              Two-way data binding
            • 343
              Javascript
            • 329
              Open source
            • 307
              Dependency injection
            • 197
              Readable
            • 75
              Fast
            • 65
              Directives
            • 63
              Great community
            • 57
              Free
            • 38
              Extend html vocabulary
            • 29
              Components
            • 26
              Easy to test
            • 25
              Easy to learn
            • 24
              Easy to templates
            • 23
              Great documentation
            • 21
              Easy to start
            • 19
              Awesome
            • 18
              Light weight
            • 15
              Angular 2.0
            • 14
              Efficient
            • 14
              Javascript mvw framework
            • 14
              Great extensions
            • 11
              Easy to prototype with
            • 9
              High performance
            • 9
              Coffeescript
            • 8
              Two-way binding
            • 8
              Lots of community modules
            • 8
              Mvc
            • 7
              Easy to e2e
            • 7
              Clean and keeps code readable
            • 6
              One of the best frameworks
            • 6
              Easy for small applications
            • 5
              Works great with jquery
            • 5
              Fast development
            • 4
              I do not touch DOM
            • 4
              The two-way Data Binding is awesome
            • 3
              Hierarchical Data Structure
            • 3
              Be a developer, not a plumber.
            • 3
              Declarative programming
            • 3
              Typescript
            • 3
              Dart
            • 3
              Community
            • 2
              Fkin awesome
            • 2
              Opinionated in the right areas
            • 2
              Supports api , easy development
            • 2
              Common Place
            • 2
              Very very useful and fast framework for development
            • 2
              Linear learning curve
            • 2
              Great
            • 2
              Amazing community support
            • 2
              Readable code
            • 2
              Programming fun again
            • 2
              The powerful of binding, routing and controlling routes
            • 2
              Scopes
            • 2
              Consistency with backend architecture if using Nest
            • 1
              Fk react, all my homies hate react
            CONS OF ANGULARJS
            • 12
              Complex
            • 3
              Event Listener Overload
            • 3
              Dependency injection
            • 2
              Hard to learn
            • 2
              Learning Curve

            related AngularJS posts

            Simon Reymann
            Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.5M views

            Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

            • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
            • npm as package manager
            • NestJS as Node.js framework
            • TypeScript as programming language
            • ExpressJS as web server
            • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
            • Postman as a tool for API development
            • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
            • JSON Web Token for access token management

            The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

            • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
            • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
            • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
            • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
            See more
            Simon Reymann
            Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 24 upvotes · 5M views

            Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

            • Nuxt.js consisting of Vue CLI, Vue Router, vuex, Webpack and Sass (Bundler for HTML5, CSS 3), Babel (Transpiler for JavaScript),
            • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed Vue.js components
            • Vuetify as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
            • TypeScript as programming language
            • Apollo / GraphQL (incl. GraphiQL) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
            • ESLint, TSLint and Prettier for coding style and code analyzes
            • Jest as testing framework
            • Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icon toolkit
            • NativeScript-Vue for mobile development

            The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

            • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
            • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
            • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
            • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
            • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
            • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
            See more
            Vue.js logo

            Vue.js

            54.7K
            1.6K
            A progressive framework for building user interfaces
            54.7K
            1.6K
            PROS OF VUE.JS
            • 294
              Simple and easy to start with
            • 230
              Good documentation
            • 196
              Components
            • 131
              Simple the best
            • 100
              Simplified AngularJS
            • 95
              Reactive
            • 78
              Intuitive APIs
            • 56
              Javascript
            • 52
              Changed my front end coding life
            • 48
              Configuration is smooth
            • 38
              Easy to learn
            • 36
              So much fun to use
            • 26
              Progressive
            • 22
              Virtual dom
            • 16
              Faster than bulldogs on hot tarmac
            • 12
              It's magic
            • 12
              Component is template, javascript and style in one
            • 10
              Light Weight
            • 10
              Perfomance
            • 9
              Best of Both Worlds
            • 8
              Application structure
            • 8
              Elegant design
            • 8
              Intuitive and easy to use
            • 8
              Without misleading licenses
            • 6
              Small learning curve
            • 6
              Good command line interface
            • 5
              Logicless templates
            • 5
              Single file components
            • 5
              Easy to integrate to HTML by inline-templates
            • 5
              Like Angular only quicker to get started with
            • 4
              High performance
            • 3
              Component based
            • 3
              Vuex
            • 3
              Bridge from Web Development to JS Development
            • 3
              Customer Render ending eg to HTML
            • 2
              Lots of documentation
            • 2
              Concise error messages
            • 2
              Supports several template languages
            • 2
              One-way data flow
            • 2
              Intuitive
            • 1
              GUI
            CONS OF VUE.JS
            • 9
              Less Common Place
            • 5
              YXMLvsHTML Markup
            • 3
              Don't support fragments
            • 3
              Only support programatically multiple root nodes

            related Vue.js posts

            Simon Reymann
            Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.5M views

            Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

            • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
            • npm as package manager
            • NestJS as Node.js framework
            • TypeScript as programming language
            • ExpressJS as web server
            • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
            • Postman as a tool for API development
            • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
            • JSON Web Token for access token management

            The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

            • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
            • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
            • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
            • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
            See more
            Johnny Bell
            Shared insights
            on
            Vue.jsVue.jsReactReact

            I've used both Vue.js and React and I would stick with React. I know that Vue.js seems easier to write and its much faster to pick up however as you mentioned above React has way more ready made components you can just plugin, and the community for React is very big.

            It might be a bit more of a steep learning curve for your friend to learn React over Vue.js but I think in the long run its the better option.

            See more