Alternatives to Webrix.js logo

Alternatives to Webrix.js

React Router, styled-components, Angular CLI, Ant Design, and Storybook are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Webrix.js.
0
1
+ 1
0

What is Webrix.js and what are its top alternatives?

It is a set of small, single-purpose React components, each aimed at overcoming a specific UI challenge. It's not a component bank, but rather a set of building blocks for creating your own unique component bank. It does all the technical heavy lifting, so you can focus on the presentation.
Webrix.js is a tool in the JavaScript Framework Components category of a tech stack.
Webrix.js is an open source tool with GitHub stars and GitHub forks. Here鈥檚 a link to Webrix.js's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Webrix.js

  • React Router

    React Router

    React Router is a complete routing solution designed specifically for React.js. It painlessly synchronizes the components of your application with the URL, with first-class support for nesting, transitions, and server side rendering. ...

  • styled-components

    styled-components

    Visual primitives for the component age. Use the best bits of ES6 and CSS to style your apps without stress 馃拝 ...

  • Angular CLI

    Angular CLI

    A command-line interface tool that you use to initialize, develop, scaffold, and maintain Angular applications. You can use the tool directly in a command shell, or indirectly through an interactive UI such as Angular Console. ...

  • Ant Design

    Ant Design

    An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework. ...

  • Storybook

    Storybook

    It is an open source tool for developing UI components in isolation for React, Vue, and Angular. It makes building stunning UIs organized and efficient. ...

  • Angular Material

    Angular Material

    Sprint from Zero to App. Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. It allows to create material styled angular apps fast and easy. ...

  • Vue CLI

    Vue CLI

    Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config. ...

  • Angular Universal

    Angular Universal

    It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive. ...

Webrix.js alternatives & related posts

React Router logo

React Router

1.4K
952
12
A complete routing solution for React.js
1.4K
952
+ 1
12
PROS OF REACT ROUTER
  • 12
    Because there's not alternative
CONS OF REACT ROUTER
    Be the first to leave a con

    related React Router posts

    ReactQL is a React + GraphQL front-end starter kit. #JSX is a natural way to think about building UI, and it renders to pure #HTML in the browser and on the server, making it trivial to build server-rendered Single Page Apps. GraphQL via Apollo was chosen for the data layer; #GraphQL makes it simple to request just the data your app needs, and #Apollo takes care of communicating with your API (written in any language; doesn't have to be JavaScript!), caching, and rendering to #React.

    ReactQL is written in TypeScript to provide full types/Intellisense, and pick up hard-to-diagnose goofs that might later show up at runtime. React makes heavy use of Webpack 4 to handle transforming your code to an optimised client-side bundle, and in throws back just enough code needed for the initial render, while seamlessly handling import statements asynchronously as needed, making the payload your user downloads ultimately much smaller than trying to do it by hand.

    React Helmet was chosen to handle <head> content, because it works universally, making it easy to throw back the correct <title> and other tags on the initial render, as well as inject new tags for subsequent client-side views.

    styled-components, Sass, Less and PostCSS were added to give developers a choice of whether to build styles purely in React / JavaScript, or whether to defer to a #css #preprocessor. This is especially useful for interop with UI frameworks like Bootstrap, Semantic UI, Foundation, etc - ReactQL lets you mix and match #css and renders to both a static .css file during bundling as well as generates per-page <style> tags when using #StyledComponents.

    React Router handles routing, because it works both on the server and in the client. ReactQL customises it further by capturing non-200 responses on the server, redirecting or throwing back custom 404 pages as needed.

    Koa is the web server that handles all incoming HTTP requests, because it's fast (TTFB < 5ms, even after fully rendering React), and its natively #async, making it easy to async/await inside routes and middleware.

    See more

    I'm creating a website with React in my free time, and this is my first time doing this. So far, I've worked with React and React Router, but migrating to Next.js or Gatsby would cover Routing and SEO, which I currently cannot work with. Most things I read say that Next.js is the best solution, but I am trying to decide whether it is worth the time and effort to recreate the site for SEO and speed purposes. Does anyone have suggestions?

    See more
    styled-components logo

    styled-components

    839
    433
    8
    Visual primitives for the component age. Use the best bits of ES6 and CSS to style your apps...
    839
    433
    + 1
    8
    PROS OF STYLED-COMPONENTS
    • 8
      Very easy to use and integrate
    CONS OF STYLED-COMPONENTS
      Be the first to leave a con

      related styled-components posts

      Johnny Bell
      Software Engineer at Weedmaps | 14 upvotes 路 477.6K views

      For Stack Decisions I needed to add Markdown in the decision composer to give our users access to some general styling when writing their decisions. We used React & GraphQL on the #Frontend and Ruby & GraphQL on the backend.

      Instead of using Showdown or another tool, We decided to parse the Markdown on the backend so we had more control over what we wanted to render in Markdown because we didn't want to enable all Markdown options, we also wanted to limit any malicious code or images to be embedded into the decisions and Markdown was a fairly large to import into our component so it was going to add a lot of kilobytes that we didn't need.

      We also needed to style how the markdown looked, we are currently using Glamorous so I used that but we are planning to update this to Emotion at some stage as it has a fairly easy upgrade path rather than switching over to styled-components or one of the other cssInJs alternatives.

      Also we used React-Mentions for tagging tools and topics in the decisions. Typing @ will let you tag a tool, and typing # will allow you to tag a topic.

      The Markdown options that we chose to support are tags: a, code, u, b, em, pre, ul, ol, li.

      If there are anymore tags you'd love to see added in the composer leave me a comment below and we will look into adding them.

      #StackDecisionsLaunch

      See more

      ReactQL is a React + GraphQL front-end starter kit. #JSX is a natural way to think about building UI, and it renders to pure #HTML in the browser and on the server, making it trivial to build server-rendered Single Page Apps. GraphQL via Apollo was chosen for the data layer; #GraphQL makes it simple to request just the data your app needs, and #Apollo takes care of communicating with your API (written in any language; doesn't have to be JavaScript!), caching, and rendering to #React.

      ReactQL is written in TypeScript to provide full types/Intellisense, and pick up hard-to-diagnose goofs that might later show up at runtime. React makes heavy use of Webpack 4 to handle transforming your code to an optimised client-side bundle, and in throws back just enough code needed for the initial render, while seamlessly handling import statements asynchronously as needed, making the payload your user downloads ultimately much smaller than trying to do it by hand.

      React Helmet was chosen to handle <head> content, because it works universally, making it easy to throw back the correct <title> and other tags on the initial render, as well as inject new tags for subsequent client-side views.

      styled-components, Sass, Less and PostCSS were added to give developers a choice of whether to build styles purely in React / JavaScript, or whether to defer to a #css #preprocessor. This is especially useful for interop with UI frameworks like Bootstrap, Semantic UI, Foundation, etc - ReactQL lets you mix and match #css and renders to both a static .css file during bundling as well as generates per-page <style> tags when using #StyledComponents.

      React Router handles routing, because it works both on the server and in the client. ReactQL customises it further by capturing non-200 responses on the server, redirecting or throwing back custom 404 pages as needed.

      Koa is the web server that handles all incoming HTTP requests, because it's fast (TTFB < 5ms, even after fully rendering React), and its natively #async, making it easy to async/await inside routes and middleware.

      See more
      Angular CLI logo

      Angular CLI

      746
      592
      0
      A command line interface for Angular
      746
      592
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF ANGULAR CLI
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF ANGULAR CLI
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Angular CLI posts

          Vaibhav Taunk
          Team Lead at Technovert | 31 upvotes 路 1.5M views

          I am starting to become a full-stack developer, by choosing and learning .NET Core for API Development, Angular CLI / React for UI Development, MongoDB for database, as it a NoSQL DB and Flutter / React Native for Mobile App Development. Using Postman, Markdown and Visual Studio Code for development.

          See more

          Picked Angular 2 as framework since Angular CLI made it easy to get started on a self-contained frontend web project with TypeScript for easier development -- thanks to intellisense extensions for Visual Studio Code, hassle-free browser compatibility with the built-in Babel transpiler and packaging with the built-in Webpack configuration.

          See more
          Ant Design logo

          Ant Design

          700
          1.2K
          201
          A set of high-quality React components
          700
          1.2K
          + 1
          201
          PROS OF ANT DESIGN
          • 37
            Lots of components
          • 28
            Polished and enterprisey look and feel
          • 20
            TypeScript
          • 18
            Easy to integrate
          • 18
            Es6 support
          • 16
            Beautiful and solid
          • 15
            Beautifully Animated Components
          • 14
            Quick Release rhythm
          • 13
            Great documentation
          • 12
            Typescript support
          • 10
            Short Code
          CONS OF ANT DESIGN
          • 14
            Less
          • 8
            Large File Size
          • 7
            Close
          • 3
            Poor accessibility support
          • 1
            Sdf

          related Ant Design posts

          Sarmad Chaudhary
          Founder & CEO at Ebiz Ltd. | 9 upvotes 路 382.4K views

          Hi there!

          I just want to have a simple poll/vote...

          If you guys need a UI/Component Library for React, Vue.js, or AngularJS, which type of library would you prefer between:

          1 ) A single maintained cross-framework library that is 100% compatible and can be integrated with any popular framework like Vue, React, Angular 2, Svelte, etc.

          2) A native framework-specific library developed to work only on target framework like ElementUI for Vue, Ant Design for React.

          Your advice would help a lot! Thanks in advance :)

          See more
          Shared insights
          on
          Material-UI
          Ant Design

          Hi, I start building an admin dashboard with next.js and looking for a frontend framework ( components ready ). So I end up with Ant Design and Material-UI, but I never built a project with these two.

          Here is a list of my requirements.

          1. Good documentation.
          2. easy CRUD ( date picker and date range picker bundled )
          3. built-in multi-lang feature or Great 3rd library support
          4. Admin dashboard template
          5. well code maintenance

          Which is better for the long run?

          See more
          Storybook logo

          Storybook

          568
          311
          0
          Build bulletproof UI components faster
          568
          311
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF STORYBOOK
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF STORYBOOK
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Storybook posts

              Robert Zuber

              We are in the process of adopting Next.js as our React framework and using Storybook to help build our React components in isolation. This new part of our frontend is written in TypeScript, and we use Emotion for CSS/styling. For delivering data, we use GraphQL and Apollo. Jest, Percy, and Cypress are used for testing.

              See more
              Angular Material  logo

              Angular Material

              506
              590
              26
              Easy to use material design for angular
              506
              590
              + 1
              26
              PROS OF ANGULAR MATERIAL
              • 10
                Components
              • 6
                Backed by a well known company
              • 3
                Simple
              • 2
                Easy
              • 2
                Very good documentation
              • 2
                Rte
              • 1
                Implements well known material design
              CONS OF ANGULAR MATERIAL
              • 3
                Fairly large

              related Angular Material posts

              Vue CLI logo

              Vue CLI

              388
              399
              3
              Standard Tooling for Vue.js Development
              388
              399
              + 1
              3
              PROS OF VUE CLI
              • 1
                GUI for installing dependencies
              • 1
                Visual Web Interface
              • 1
                Detects and run npm tasks
              CONS OF VUE CLI
                Be the first to leave a con

                related Vue CLI posts

                Simon Reymann
                Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH | 19 upvotes 路 619.9K views

                Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

                • Nuxt.js consisting of Vue CLI, Vue Router, vuex, Webpack and Sass (Bundler for HTML5, CSS 3), Babel (Transpiler for JavaScript),
                • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed Vue.js components
                • Vuetify as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
                • TypeScript as programming language
                • Apollo / GraphQL (incl. GraphiQL) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
                • ESLint, TSLint and Prettier for coding style and code analyzes
                • Jest as testing framework
                • Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icon toolkit
                • NativeScript-Vue for mobile development

                The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

                • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
                • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
                • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
                • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
                • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
                • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
                See more
                Angular Universal logo

                Angular Universal

                290
                301
                21
                A technology that renders Angular applications on the server
                290
                301
                + 1
                21
                PROS OF ANGULAR UNIVERSAL
                • 3
                  Same existing code base for both SPA and SSR
                • 3
                  Typescript
                • 3
                  Complete Framework
                • 2
                  Dynamic rendering
                • 2
                  SEO
                • 2
                  Easy setup
                • 2
                  Static site generator
                • 2
                  Server rendering and code splitting
                • 2
                  Is not React
                CONS OF ANGULAR UNIVERSAL
                • 1
                  Not React

                related Angular Universal posts