Alternatives to WebRTC logo

Alternatives to WebRTC

SignalR, XMPP, Zoom, Twilio, and Slack are the most popular alternatives and competitors to WebRTC.
323
533
+ 1
6

What is WebRTC and what are its top alternatives?

It is a free, open project that enables web browsers with Real-Time Communications (RTC) capabilities via simple JavaScript APIs. The WebRTC components have been optimized to best serve this purpose.
WebRTC is a tool in the Web and Video Conferencing category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to WebRTC

  • SignalR
    SignalR

    SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization. ...

  • XMPP
    XMPP

    It is a set of open technologies for instant messaging, presence, multi-party chat, voice and video calls, collaboration, lightweight middleware, content syndication, and generalized routing of XML data. ...

  • Zoom
    Zoom

    Zoom unifies cloud video conferencing, simple online meetings, and cross platform group chat into one easy-to-use platform. Our solution offers the best video, audio, and screen-sharing experience across Zoom Rooms, Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, and H.323/SIP room systems. ...

  • Twilio
    Twilio

    Twilio offers developers a powerful API for phone services to make and receive phone calls, and send and receive text messages. Their product allows programmers to more easily integrate various communication methods into their software and programs. ...

  • Slack
    Slack

    Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together. ...

  • Jira
    Jira

    Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster. ...

  • Trello
    Trello

    Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process. ...

  • G Suite
    G Suite

    An integrated suite of secure, cloud-native collaboration and productivity apps. It includes Gmail, Docs, Drive, Calendar, Meet and more. ...

WebRTC alternatives & related posts

SignalR logo

SignalR

494
146
A new library for ASP.NET developers that makes developing real-time web functionality easy.
494
146
PROS OF SIGNALR
  • 32
    Supports .NET server
  • 25
    Real-time
  • 18
    Free
  • 16
    Fallback to SSE, forever frame, long polling
  • 15
    WebSockets
  • 10
    Simple
  • 9
    Open source
  • 8
    Ease of use
  • 8
    JSON
  • 5
    Cool
  • 0
    Azure
CONS OF SIGNALR
  • 2
    Expertise hard to get
  • 2
    Requires jQuery
  • 1
    Weak iOS and Android support
  • 1
    Big differences between ASP.NET and Core versions

related SignalR posts

Shared insights
on
gRPCgRPCSignalRSignalR.NET.NET

We need to interact from several different Web applications (remote) to a client-side application (.exe in .NET Framework, Windows.Console under our controlled environment). From the web applications, we need to send and receive data and invoke methods to client-side .exe on javascript events like users onclick. SignalR is one of the .Net alternatives to do that, but it adds overhead for what we need. Is it better to add SignalR at both client-side application and remote web application, or use gRPC as it sounds lightest and is multilingual?

SignalR or gRPC are always sending and receiving data on the client-side (from browser to .exe and back to browser). And web application is used for graphical visualization of data to the user. There is no need for local .exe to send or interact with remote web API. Which architecture or framework do you suggest to use in this case?

See more
XMPP logo

XMPP

69
0
An open XML technology for real-time communication
69
0
PROS OF XMPP
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF XMPP
      Be the first to leave a con

      related XMPP posts

      Zoom logo

      Zoom

      1.7K
      155
      Video Conferencing, Web Conferencing, Webinars, Screen Sharing
      1.7K
      155
      PROS OF ZOOM
      • 25
        Web conferencing made easy
      • 16
        Remote control option
      • 13
        Draw on screen
      • 12
        Very reliable
      • 11
        In-meeting chat is pretty good
      • 9
        Free
      • 9
        Pair programming sessions with shared controls
      • 8
        Easy to share meeting links/invites
      • 7
        Good Sound Quality
      • 6
        Cloud recordings for meetings
      • 5
        Great mobile app
      • 4
        Virtual backgrounds
      • 4
        Recording Feature
      • 4
        Other people use it
      • 4
        User Friendly actions
      • 2
        Reactions (emoticons)
      • 2
        Auto reconnecting
      • 2
        Chrome extension is great to easily create meetings
      • 2
        While sharing screen, you can still see your video
      • 2
        Mute all participants at once
      • 2
        When ending the videocall, everybody gets kicked
      • 2
        Different options for blocking chat
      • 1
        Easily share video with audio
      • 1
        /zoom on Slack
      • 1
        Registration form
      • 1
        Meant for business and education
      • 0
        Zoom
      CONS OF ZOOM
      • 20
        Limited time if you are a basic member
      • 14
        Limited Storage
      • 11
        Hate how sharing your screen defaults to Full Screen
      • 10
        Quality isn't great (Free)
      • 9
        No cursor highlight on screenshare.
      • 8
        Potential security flaws
      • 7
        Onboarding process for new users is not intuitive
      • 5
        Virtual background quality isn't good
      • 5
        Security
      • 4
        Editing can be improved
      • 4
        Doesn't handle switching audio sources well
      • 4
        The native calendar is buggy
      • 4
        Dashboard can be improved
      • 3
        Pornographic material displayed
      • 3
        Any body can get in it
      • 3
        Not many emojis
      • 3
        Past chat history is not saved
      • 3
        Recording Feature
      • 3
        En In reality,the chat in the meet not is excelent,noo
      • 3
        Zoom lags a lot

      related Zoom posts

      Yonas Beshawred

      Using Screenhero via Slack was getting to be pretty horrible. Video and sound quality was often times pretty bad and worst of all the service just wasn't reliable. We all had high hopes when the acquisition went through but ultimately, the product just didn't live up to expectations. We ended up trying Zoom after I had heard about it from some friends at other companies. We noticed the video/sound quality was better, and more importantly it was super reliable. The Slack integration was awesome (just type /zoom and it starts a call)

      You can schedule recurring calls which is helpful. There's a G Suite (Google Calendar) integration which lets you add a Zoom call (w/dial in info + link to web/mobile) with the click of a button.

      Meeting recordings (video and audio) are really nice, you get recordings stored in the cloud on the higher tier plans. One of our engineers, Jerome, actually built a cool little Slack integration using the Slack API and Zoom API so that every time a recording is processed, a link gets posted to the "event-recordings" channel. The iOS app is great too!

      #WebAndVideoConferencing #videochat

      See more

      Server side

      We decided to use Python for our backend because it is one of the industry standard languages for data analysis and machine learning. It also has a lot of support due to its large user base.

      • Web Server: We chose Flask because we want to keep our machine learning / data analysis and the web server in the same language. Flask is easy to use and we all have experience with it. Postman will be used for creating and testing APIs due to its convenience.

      • Machine Learning: We decided to go with PyTorch for machine learning since it is one of the most popular libraries. It is also known to have an easier learning curve than other popular libraries such as Tensorflow. This is important because our team lacks ML experience and learning the tool as fast as possible would increase productivity.

      • Data Analysis: Some common Python libraries will be used to analyze our data. These include NumPy, Pandas , and matplotlib. These tools combined will help us learn the properties and characteristics of our data. Jupyter notebook will be used to help organize the data analysis process, and improve the code readability.

      Client side

      • UI: We decided to use React for the UI because it helps organize the data and variables of the application into components, making it very convenient to maintain our dashboard. Since React is one of the most popular front end frameworks right now, there will be a lot of support for it as well as a lot of potential new hires that are familiar with the framework. CSS 3 and HTML5 will be used for the basic styling and structure of the web app, as they are the most widely used front end languages.

      • State Management: We decided to use Redux to manage the state of the application since it works naturally to React. Our team also already has experience working with Redux which gave it a slight edge over the other state management libraries.

      • Data Visualization: We decided to use the React-based library Victory to visualize the data. They have very user friendly documentation on their official website which we find easy to learn from.

      Cache

      • Caching: We decided between Redis and memcached because they are two of the most popular open-source cache engines. We ultimately decided to use Redis to improve our web app performance mainly due to the extra functionalities it provides such as fine-tuning cache contents and durability.

      Database

      • Database: We decided to use a NoSQL database over a relational database because of its flexibility from not having a predefined schema. The user behavior analytics has to be flexible since the data we plan to store may change frequently. We decided on MongoDB because it is lightweight and we can easily host the database with MongoDB Atlas . Everyone on our team also has experience working with MongoDB.

      Infrastructure

      • Deployment: We decided to use Heroku over AWS, Azure, Google Cloud because it is free. Although there are advantages to the other cloud services, Heroku makes the most sense to our team because our primary goal is to build an MVP.

      Other Tools

      • Communication Slack will be used as the primary source of communication. It provides all the features needed for basic discussions. In terms of more interactive meetings, Zoom will be used for its video calls and screen sharing capabilities.

      • Source Control The project will be stored on GitHub and all code changes will be done though pull requests. This will help us keep the codebase clean and make it easy to revert changes when we need to.

      See more
      Twilio logo

      Twilio

      11.3K
      521
      Bring voice and messaging to your web and mobile applications.
      11.3K
      521
      PROS OF TWILIO
      • 148
        Powerful, simple, and well documented api
      • 88
        RESTful API
      • 66
        Clear pricing
      • 61
        Great sms services
      • 58
        Low cost of entry
      • 29
        Global SMS Gateway
      • 14
        Good value
      • 12
        Cloud IVR
      • 11
        Simple
      • 11
        Extremely simple to integrate with rails
      • 6
        Great for startups
      • 5
        SMS
      • 3
        Great developer program
      • 3
        Hassle free
      • 2
        Text me the app pages
      • 1
        New Features constantly rolling out
      • 1
        Many deployment options, from build from scratch to buy
      • 1
        Easy integration
      • 1
        Two factor authentication
      CONS OF TWILIO
      • 4
        Predictable pricing
      • 2
        Expensive

      related Twilio posts

      Ravi Sathanapalli
      Director Product Management at Centime · | 7 upvotes · 133.2K views
      Shared insights
      on
      TwilioTwilioAmazon SNSAmazon SNS

      Hi, We are looking to implement 2FA - so that users would be sent a Verification code over their Email and SMS to their phone.

      We faced some limitations with Amazon SNS where we could either send the verification code to email OR to the phone number, while we want to send it to both.

      We also are looking to make the 2FA more flexible by adding any other options later on.

      What are the best alternatives to SNS for this use case and purpose? Looked at Twilio but want to explore other options before making a decision.

      Would be great to know what the experience with Twilio has been, especially the limitations/issues with Twilio...

      Appreciate any input from users of Twilio and others who have had similar use cases.

      See more
      Cheri Booth
      Vendor Relationship Manager at Storage Asset Management · | 6 upvotes · 66.8K views
      Shared insights
      on
      ClickatellClickatellTwilioTwilio

      Searching for options for SMS that integrates with SiteLink and will allow personalization of text and tracking of both incoming/outgoing messages with reporting (Time, date, call#, etc) Have been looking at Twilio, and seems most leaning toward this. Are there any other options known that integrate into SiteLink? Also looked at Clickatell.

      See more
      Slack logo

      Slack

      119.6K
      6K
      Bring all your communication together in one place
      119.6K
      6K
      PROS OF SLACK
      • 1.2K
        Easy to integrate with
      • 876
        Excellent interface on multiple platforms
      • 849
        Free
      • 694
        Mobile friendly
      • 690
        People really enjoy using it
      • 331
        Great integrations
      • 315
        Flexible notification preferences
      • 198
        Unlimited users
      • 184
        Strong search and data archiving
      • 155
        Multi domain switching support
      • 82
        Easy to use
      • 40
        Beautiful
      • 27
        Hubot support
      • 22
        Unread/read control
      • 21
        Slackbot
      • 19
        Permalink for each messages
      • 17
        Text snippet with highlighting
      • 15
        Quote message easily
      • 14
        Per-room notification
      • 13
        Awesome integration support
      • 12
        Star for each message / attached files
      • 12
        IRC gateway
      • 11
        Good communication within a team
      • 11
        Dropbox Integration
      • 10
        Slick, search is great
      • 10
        Jira Integration
      • 9
        New Relic Integration
      • 8
        Great communication tool
      • 8
        Combine All Services Quickly
      • 8
        Asana Integration
      • 7
        This tool understands developers
      • 7
        XMPP gateway
      • 7
        Google Drive Integration
      • 7
        Awesomeness
      • 6
        Replaces email
      • 6
        Twitter Integration
      • 6
        Google Docs Integration
      • 6
        BitBucket integration
      • 5
        Jenkins Integration
      • 5
        GREAT Customer Support / Quick Response to Feedback
      • 5
        Guest and Restricted user control
      • 4
        Clean UI
      • 4
        Excellent multi platform internal communication tool
      • 4
        GitHub integration
      • 4
        Mention list view
      • 4
        Gathers all my communications in one place
      • 3
        Perfect implementation of chat + integrations
      • 3
        Easy
      • 3
        Easy to add a reaction
      • 3
        Timely while non intrusive
      • 3
        Great on-boarding
      • 3
        Threaded chat
      • 3
        Visual Studio Integration
      • 3
        Easy to start working with
      • 3
        Android app
      • 2
        Simplicity
      • 2
        Message Actions
      • 2
        It's basically an improved (although closed) IRC
      • 2
        So much better than email
      • 2
        Eases collaboration for geographically dispersed teams
      • 2
        Great interface
      • 2
        Great Channel Customization
      • 2
        Markdown
      • 2
        Intuitive, easy to use, great integrations
      • 1
        Great Support Team
      • 1
        Watch
      • 1
        Multi work-space support
      • 1
        Flexible and Accessible
      • 1
        Better User Experience
      • 1
        Archive Importing
      • 1
        Travis CI integration
      • 1
        It's the coolest IM ever
      • 1
        Community
      • 1
        Great API
      • 1
        Easy remote communication
      • 1
        Get less busy
      • 1
        API
      • 1
        Zapier integration
      • 1
        Targetprocess integration
      • 1
        Finally with terrible "threading"—I miss Flowdock
      • 1
        Complete with plenty of Electron BLOAT
      • 1
        I was 666 star :D
      • 1
        Dev communication Made Easy
      • 1
        Integrates with just about everything
      • 1
        Very customizable
      • 0
        Platforms
      • 0
        Easy to useL
      CONS OF SLACK
      • 13
        Can be distracting depending on how you use it
      • 6
        Requires some management for large teams
      • 6
        Limit messages history
      • 5
        Too expensive
      • 5
        You don't really own your messages
      • 4
        Too many notifications by default

      related Slack posts

      Lucas Litton
      Founder & CEO at Macombey · | 24 upvotes · 321.1K views

      Sentry has been essential to our development approach. Nobody likes errors or apps that crash. We use Sentry heavily during Node.js and React development. Our developers are able to see error reports, crashes, user's browsers, and more, all in one place. Sentry also seamlessly integrates with Asana, Slack, and GitHub.

      See more
      Jakub Olan
      Node.js Software Engineer · | 17 upvotes · 445.8K views

      Last time we shared there information about our decision about using YouTrack over Jira actually we found much better solution that our team have loved. Linear is a minimalistic issue tracker that integrates well with Sentry, GitHub, Slack and Figma which are our basic tools. I would like to recommend checking out Linear as a potential alternative to "heavy" issue trackers, maybe at enterprises that may not work but when we're a startup that works awesome!

      See more
      Jira logo

      Jira

      61.5K
      1.2K
      The #1 software development tool used by agile teams to plan, track, and release great software.
      61.5K
      1.2K
      PROS OF JIRA
      • 310
        Powerful
      • 254
        Flexible
      • 149
        Easy separation of projects
      • 113
        Run in the cloud
      • 105
        Code integration
      • 58
        Easy to use
      • 53
        Run on your own
      • 39
        Great customization
      • 39
        Easy Workflow Configuration
      • 27
        REST API
      • 12
        Great Agile Management tool
      • 7
        Integrates with virtually everything
      • 6
        Confluence
      • 6
        Complicated
      • 3
        Sentry Issues Integration
      • 2
        It's awesome
      CONS OF JIRA
      • 8
        Rather expensive
      • 5
        Large memory requirement
      • 2
        Slow
      • 1
        Cloud or Datacenter only

      related Jira posts

      Johnny Bell

      So I am a huge fan of JIRA like #massive I used it for many many years, and really loved it, used it personally and at work. I would suggest every new workplace that I worked at to switch to JIRA instead of what I was using.

      When I started at #StackShare we were using a Trello #Kanban board and I was so shocked at how easy the workflow was to follow, create new tasks and get tasks QA'd and deployed. What was so great about this was it didn't come with all the complexity of JIRA. Like setting up a project, user rules etc. You are able to hit the ground running with Trello and get tasks started right away without being overwhelmed with the complexity of options in JIRA

      With a few TrelloPowerUps we were easily able to add GitHub integration and storyPoints to our cards and thats all we needed to get a really nice agile workflow going.

      I'm not saying that JIRA is not useful, I can see larger companies being able to use the JIRA features and have the time to go through all the complex setup to get a really good workflow going. But for smaller #Startups that want to hit the ground running Trello for me is the way to go.

      In saying that what I would love Trello to implement is to allow me to create custom fields. Right now we just have a Description field. So I am adding User Stories & How To Test in the Markdown of the Description if I could have these as custom fields then my #Agile workflow would be complete.

      #StackDecisionsLaunch

      See more
      Jakub Olan
      Node.js Software Engineer · | 17 upvotes · 445.8K views

      Last time we shared there information about our decision about using YouTrack over Jira actually we found much better solution that our team have loved. Linear is a minimalistic issue tracker that integrates well with Sentry, GitHub, Slack and Figma which are our basic tools. I would like to recommend checking out Linear as a potential alternative to "heavy" issue trackers, maybe at enterprises that may not work but when we're a startup that works awesome!

      See more
      Trello logo

      Trello

      43.1K
      3.7K
      Your entire project, in a single glance
      43.1K
      3.7K
      PROS OF TRELLO
      • 715
        Great for collaboration
      • 628
        Easy to use
      • 573
        Free
      • 375
        Fast
      • 347
        Realtime
      • 237
        Intuitive
      • 215
        Visualizing
      • 169
        Flexible
      • 126
        Fun user interface
      • 83
        Snappy and blazing fast
      • 30
        Simple, intuitive UI that gets out of your way
      • 27
        Kanban
      • 21
        Clean Interface
      • 18
        Easy setup
      • 18
        Card Structure
      • 17
        Drag and drop attachments
      • 11
        Simple
      • 10
        Markdown commentary on cards
      • 9
        Lists
      • 9
        Integration with other work collaborative apps
      • 8
        Satisfying User Experience
      • 8
        Cross-Platform Integration
      • 7
        Recognizes GitHub commit links
      • 6
        Easy to learn
      • 5
        Great
      • 4
        Better than email
      • 4
        Versatile Team & Project Management
      • 3
        and lots of integrations
      • 3
        Trello’s Developmental Transparency
      • 3
        Effective
      • 2
        Easy
      • 2
        Powerful
      • 2
        Agile
      • 2
        Easy to have an overview of the project status
      • 2
        flexible and fast
      • 2
        Simple and intuitive
      • 1
        Name rolls of the tongue
      • 1
        Customizable
      • 1
        Email integration
      • 1
        Personal organisation
      • 1
        Nice
      • 1
        Great organizing (of events/tasks)
      • 0
        Easiest way to visually express the scope of projects
      CONS OF TRELLO
      • 5
        No concept of velocity or points
      • 4
        Very light native integrations
      • 2
        A little too flexible

      related Trello posts

      Johnny Bell

      So I am a huge fan of JIRA like #massive I used it for many many years, and really loved it, used it personally and at work. I would suggest every new workplace that I worked at to switch to JIRA instead of what I was using.

      When I started at #StackShare we were using a Trello #Kanban board and I was so shocked at how easy the workflow was to follow, create new tasks and get tasks QA'd and deployed. What was so great about this was it didn't come with all the complexity of JIRA. Like setting up a project, user rules etc. You are able to hit the ground running with Trello and get tasks started right away without being overwhelmed with the complexity of options in JIRA

      With a few TrelloPowerUps we were easily able to add GitHub integration and storyPoints to our cards and thats all we needed to get a really nice agile workflow going.

      I'm not saying that JIRA is not useful, I can see larger companies being able to use the JIRA features and have the time to go through all the complex setup to get a really good workflow going. But for smaller #Startups that want to hit the ground running Trello for me is the way to go.

      In saying that what I would love Trello to implement is to allow me to create custom fields. Right now we just have a Description field. So I am adding User Stories & How To Test in the Markdown of the Description if I could have these as custom fields then my #Agile workflow would be complete.

      #StackDecisionsLaunch

      See more
      Francisco Quintero
      Tech Lead at Dev As Pros · | 13 upvotes · 1.8M views

      For Etom, a side project. We wanted to test an idea for a future and bigger project.

      What Etom does is searching places. Right now, it leverages the Google Maps API. For that, we found a React component that makes this integration easy because using Google Maps API is not possible via normal API requests.

      You kind of need a map to work as a proxy between the software and Google Maps API.

      We hate configuration(coming from Rails world) so also decided to use Create React App because setting up a React app, with all the toys, it's a hard job.

      Thanks to all the people behind Create React App it's easier to start any React application.

      We also chose a module called Reactstrap which is Bootstrap UI in React components.

      An important thing in this side project(and in the bigger project plan) is to measure visitor through out the app. For that we researched and found that Keen was a good choice(very good free tier limits) and also it is very simple to setup and real simple to send data to

      Slack and Trello are our defaults tools to comunicate ideas and discuss topics, so, no brainer using them as well for this project.

      See more
      G Suite logo

      G Suite

      31.5K
      2.5K
      Collaboration and productivity apps for Business
      31.5K
      2.5K
      PROS OF G SUITE
      • 609
        Gmail
      • 447
        Google docs
      • 365
        Calendar
      • 284
        Great for startups
      • 230
        Easy to work
      • 115
        Document management & workflow
      • 110
        Very easy to share
      • 80
        No brainer
      • 59
        Google groups
      • 59
        Google scripts & api
      • 22
        Google drive
      • 16
        Popular
      • 13
        No spam, phishing protection
      • 12
        Google Spreadsheets
      • 12
        Easy
      • 10
        Cloud based and collaboration
      • 7
        Simple and fast document creation collaboration
      • 6
        Best Cloud environment ever
      • 5
        Google maps api
      • 3
        Awesome Collaboration Tools
      • 3
        Google-powered Search in Gmail
      • 3
        Geolocation
      • 1
        도메인 단위로 어플을 관리할 수 있고, 클라우드지만 강력한 보안기능과 기기관리 기능을 제공
      • 1
        music
      • 1
        Single sign-on
      • 1
        Simple
      CONS OF G SUITE
      • 6
        Starting to get pricey
      • 4
        Good luck changing domains
      • 1
        Lesser fonts and styling available in mail compose
      • 1
        Long emails get truncated

      related G Suite posts

      Yonas Beshawred

      Using Screenhero via Slack was getting to be pretty horrible. Video and sound quality was often times pretty bad and worst of all the service just wasn't reliable. We all had high hopes when the acquisition went through but ultimately, the product just didn't live up to expectations. We ended up trying Zoom after I had heard about it from some friends at other companies. We noticed the video/sound quality was better, and more importantly it was super reliable. The Slack integration was awesome (just type /zoom and it starts a call)

      You can schedule recurring calls which is helpful. There's a G Suite (Google Calendar) integration which lets you add a Zoom call (w/dial in info + link to web/mobile) with the click of a button.

      Meeting recordings (video and audio) are really nice, you get recordings stored in the cloud on the higher tier plans. One of our engineers, Jerome, actually built a cool little Slack integration using the Slack API and Zoom API so that every time a recording is processed, a link gets posted to the "event-recordings" channel. The iOS app is great too!

      #WebAndVideoConferencing #videochat

      See more
      Nasser Khan
      Product Manager at StackShare · | 13 upvotes · 435.3K views
      Shared insights
      on
      G SuiteG SuiteSlackSlack
      at

      We are highly dependent on G Suite for all our collaboration and productivity needs, from Gmail and Calendar to Sheets and Docs. While it may not be as robust as Microsoft's offerings in those areas, it's totally cloud-based, we've never had any downtime issues and it integrates well with our other tools like Slack. We write and collaborate on all our specs/PRDs in Docs, share analyses via Sheets and handle our meetings via Calendar. #StackDecisionsLaunch #ProductivitySuite #Collaboration #DocumentCollaboration

      See more