StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Network Monitoring
  5. WireEdit vs Wireshark

WireEdit vs Wireshark

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

WireEdit
WireEdit
Stacks0
Followers6
Votes0
Wireshark
Wireshark
Stacks95
Followers57
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.6K
Forks2.1K

WireEdit vs Wireshark: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Key differences between WireEdit and Wireshark:

1. **Functionality**: WireEdit is designed for editing and modifying network packets, while Wireshark is primarily focused on network analysis and packet sniffing.
2. **User Interface**: WireEdit provides a more user-friendly and intuitive interface for packet manipulation, whereas Wireshark can be overwhelming for beginners due to its extensive features and complex layout.
3. **Target Audience**: WireEdit is more suitable for network engineers who need to quickly edit packets for testing purposes, whereas Wireshark caters to network administrators and security professionals requiring in-depth packet analysis.
4. **Compatibility**: WireEdit works on Windows and Linux operating systems, while Wireshark is compatible with a wider range of platforms including macOS.
5. **Cost**: WireEdit offers a one-time purchase license fee, while Wireshark is open-source and free to use, making it more cost-effective for organizations with budget constraints.
6. **Packet Editing Ability**: WireEdit allows users to easily modify packet contents and headers, making it ideal for troubleshooting and customizing network traffic, whereas Wireshark focuses more on capturing and analyzing packet data to identify network issues.

In Summary, the key differences between WireEdit and Wireshark lie in their functionality, user interface, target audience, compatibility, cost, and packet editing abilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

WireEdit
WireEdit
Wireshark
Wireshark

WireEdit is a desktop WYSIWYG packet editor. It lets you easily edit captured network packets in a simple point-and-click interface.

It is the world’s foremost and widely-used network protocol analyzer. It lets you see what’s happening on your network at a microscopic level and is the de facto standard across many commercial and non-profit enterprises, government agencies, and educational institutions.

Edit any packet at any layer from L1 to L7 with just a few mouse clicks. No hacking required. No need to look at Hex dumps.;WireEdit knows all mandatory/optional elements of a packet, their data types, encoding, inter-dependency, position offsets, value constraints, checksums, etc.;As you're editing WireEdit takes care of all the behind-the-scene details on the fly. No need to think about any of it.
Deep inspection of hundreds of protocols, with more being added all the time; Live capture and offline analysis; Standard three-pane packet browser; Multi-platform: Runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, Solaris, FreeBSD, NetBSD, and many others; Captured network data can be browsed via a GUI, or via the TTY-mode TShark utility
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.1K
Stacks
0
Stacks
95
Followers
6
Followers
57
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
Oracle Solaris
Oracle Solaris

What are some alternatives to WireEdit, Wireshark?

Riemann

Riemann

Riemann aggregates events from your servers and applications with a powerful stream processing language. Send an email for every exception in your app. Track the latency distribution of your web app. See the top processes on any host, by memory and CPU.

Packetbeat

Packetbeat

Packetbeat agents sniff the traffic between your application processes, parse on the fly protocols like HTTP, MySQL, Postgresql or REDIS and correlate the messages into transactions.

Observium

Observium

It is a low-maintenance auto-discovering network monitoring platform supporting a wide range of device types, platforms and operating systems

Beats

Beats

Beats is the platform for single-purpose data shippers. They send data from hundreds or thousands of machines and systems to Logstash or Elasticsearch.

PRTG

PRTG

It can monitor and classify system conditions like bandwidth usage or uptime and collect statistics from miscellaneous hosts as switches, routers, servers and other devices and applications.

LibreNMS

LibreNMS

It is an auto-discovering PHP/MySQL/SNMP based network monitoring which includes support for a wide range of network hardware and operating systems including Cisco, Linux, FreeBSD, Juniper, Brocade, Foundry, HP and many more.

Tailscale

Tailscale

It connect all your devices using WireGuard, without the hassle. Create a secure network between your servers, computers, and cloud instances. Even when separated by firewalls or subnets, Tailscale just works. It makes it as easy as installing an app and signing in.

Nagios XI

Nagios XI

It is the most powerful and trusted network monitoring software on the market. It extends on proven, enterprise-class Open Source components to deliver the best network, server and application monitoring solution for today's demanding organizational requirements.

Snort

Snort

It is an open-source, free and lightweight network intrusion detection system (NIDS) software for Linux and Windows to detect emerging threats.

Pi-hole

Pi-hole

It is a DNS sinkhole that protects your devices from unwanted content, without installing any client-side software. You can run it in a container, or deploy it directly to a supported operating system via our automated installer.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana