Alternatives to wxWidgets logo

Alternatives to wxWidgets

Qt, Electron, JavaFX, Qt5, and Element are the most popular alternatives and competitors to wxWidgets.
14
37
+ 1
13

What is wxWidgets and what are its top alternatives?

It is a C++ library that lets developers create applications for Windows, macOS, Linux and other platforms with a single code base. It has popular language bindings for Python, Perl, Ruby and many other languages, and unlike other cross-platform toolkits, it gives applications a truly native look and feel because it uses the platform's native API rather than emulating the GUI. It's also extensive, free, open-source and mature.
wxWidgets is a tool in the Cross-Platform Desktop Development category of a tech stack.
wxWidgets is an open source tool with 3.8K GitHub stars and 1.3K GitHub forks. Here’s a link to wxWidgets's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to wxWidgets

  • Qt

    Qt

    Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets. ...

  • Electron

    Electron

    With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor. ...

  • JavaFX

    JavaFX

    It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms. ...

  • Qt5

    Qt5

    It is a full development framework with tools designed to streamline the creation of applications and user interfaces for desktop, embedded, and mobile platforms. ...

  • Element

    Element

    Element is a Vue 2.0 based component library for developers, designers and product managers, with a set of design resources. ...

  • pygame

    pygame

    It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language. ...

  • SDL

    SDL

    It is a cross-platform development library designed to provide low level access to audio, keyboard, mouse, joystick, and graphics hardware via OpenGL and Direct3D. ...

  • Nativefier

    Nativefier

    Nativefier is a command line tool that allows you to easily create a desktop application for any web site with succinct and minimal configuration. Apps are wrapped by Electron in an OS executable (.app, .exe, etc.) for use on Windows, OSX and Linux. ...

wxWidgets alternatives & related posts

Qt logo

Qt

301
397
74
A leading cross-platform application and UI framework
301
397
+ 1
74
PROS OF QT
  • 11
    High Performance
  • 9
    Performance
  • 9
    Declarative, easy and flexible UI
  • 8
    Cross platform
  • 6
    Up to date framework
  • 6
    Easiest integration with C++
  • 6
    Fast prototyping
  • 4
    Safe 2D Renderer
  • 4
    Python
  • 3
    Great Community Support
  • 3
    HW Accelerated UI
  • 3
    Multiple license including Open Source and Commercial
  • 2
    JIT and QML Compiler
  • 0
    Game Engine like UI system
  • 0
    From high to low level coding
  • 0
    Great mobile support with Felgo add-on
  • 0
    True cross-platform framework with native code compile
  • 0
    Been using it since the 90s - runs anywhere does it all
  • 0
    Easy Integrating to DX and OpenGL and Vulkan
CONS OF QT
  • 4
    Paid
  • 4
    C++ is not so productive
  • 1
    Lack of libraries
  • 1
    Not detailed documentation
  • 1
    Lack of community support

related Qt posts

Electron logo

Electron

7K
6.3K
131
Build cross platform desktop apps with JavaScript, HTML, and CSS
7K
6.3K
+ 1
131
PROS OF ELECTRON
  • 65
    Easy to make rich cross platform desktop applications
  • 49
    Open source
  • 10
    Great looking apps such as Slack and Visual Studio Code
  • 4
    Because it's cross platform
  • 3
    Use Node.js in the Main Process
CONS OF ELECTRON
  • 16
    Uses a lot of memory
  • 8
    User experience never as good as a native app
  • 4
    No proper documentation
  • 4
    Does not native
  • 1
    Each app needs to install a new chromium + nodejs
  • 1
    Wrong reference for dom inspection

related Electron posts

Slack's new desktop application was launched for macOS. It was built using Electron for a faster, frameless look with a host of background improvements for a superior Slack experience. Instead of adopting a complete-in-box approach taken by other apps, Slack prefers a hybrid approach where some of the assets are loaded as part of the app, while others are made available remotely. Slack's original desktop app was written using the MacGap v1 framework using WebView to host web content within the native app frame. But it was difficult to upgrade with new features only available to Apple's WKWebView and moving to this view called for a total application rewrite.

Electron brings together Chromium's rendering engine with the Node.js runtime and module system. The new desktop app is now based on an ES6 + async/await React application is currently being moved gradually to TypeScript. Electron functions on Chromium's multi-process model, with each Slack team signed into a separate process and memory space. It also helps prevent remote content to directly access desktop features using a feature called WebView Element which creates a fresh Chromium renderer process and assigns rendering of content for its hosting renderer. Additional security can be ensured by preventing Node.js modules from leaking into the API surface and watching out for APIs with file paths. Communication between processes on Electron is carried out via electron-remote, a pared-down, zippy version of Electron's remote module, which makes implementing the web apps UI much easier.

See more

The Slack desktop app was originally written us the MacGap framework, which used Apple’s WebView to host web content inside of a native app frame. As this approach continued to present product limitations, Slack decided to migrate the desktop app to Electron. Electron is a platform that combines the rendering engine from Chromium and the Node.js runtime and module system. The desktop app is written as a modern ES6 + async/await React application.

For the desktop app, Slack takes a hybrid approach, wherein some of the assets ship as part of the app, but most of their assets and code are loaded remotely.

See more
JavaFX logo

JavaFX

204
252
4
A Java library for building Rich Internet Applications
204
252
+ 1
4
PROS OF JAVAFX
  • 4
    Light
CONS OF JAVAFX
  • 1
    Community support less than qt
  • 1
    Complicated

related JavaFX posts

Qt5 logo

Qt5

69
90
0
A free and open-source widget toolkit
69
90
+ 1
0
PROS OF QT5
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF QT5
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Qt5 posts

      Element logo

      Element

      60
      82
      3
      A Vue 2.0-based desktop UI library for developers, designers and PMs
      60
      82
      + 1
      3
      PROS OF ELEMENT
      • 3
        Very complete solution
      CONS OF ELEMENT
      • 1
        Buggy in parts

      related Element posts

      pygame logo

      pygame

      50
      95
      4
      Open Source python programming language library for making multimedia applications
      50
      95
      + 1
      4
      PROS OF PYGAME
      • 2
        Easy to install
      • 1
        Simple
      • 1
        Lightweigt by only being 12 mb
      CONS OF PYGAME
      • 2
        Has only 2d
      • 1
        Slow

      related pygame posts

      SDL logo

      SDL

      28
      29
      0
      A cross-platform software development library
      28
      29
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF SDL
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF SDL
          Be the first to leave a con

          related SDL posts

          Nativefier logo

          Nativefier

          24
          74
          1
          Wrap any web page natively without even thinking, across Windows, OSX and Linux
          24
          74
          + 1
          1
          PROS OF NATIVEFIER
          • 1
            Has a better Javascript support, and is much faster
          CONS OF NATIVEFIER
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Nativefier posts