StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. ABP Commercial vs Laravel

ABP Commercial vs Laravel

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Laravel
Laravel
Stacks28.7K
Followers23.8K
Votes3.9K
GitHub Stars82.6K
Forks24.6K
ABP Commercial
ABP Commercial
Stacks21
Followers63
Votes31

ABP Commercial vs Laravel: What are the differences?

Introduction:

ABP Commercial and Laravel are both popular frameworks used for web development. However, there are key differences between the two that make them unique in their own ways. This markdown code will discuss and provide a detailed comparison of the key differences between ABP Commercial and Laravel.

  1. Architecture: ABP Commercial follows an integrated modular architecture that allows developers to easily build applications by using pre-built modules. It provides a standardized development approach and simplifies the development process. On the other hand, Laravel follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architectural pattern. It separates the application logic into three interconnected components, making it flexible and scalable.

  2. Support and Community: ABP Commercial is a commercially supported framework with dedicated technical support, documentation, and regular updates provided by the ABP team. It offers a strong community support system for developers. In contrast, Laravel is an open-source framework with a vast community of developers actively contributing to its growth. It provides extensive documentation, forums, and community-driven resources for support.

  3. Learning Curve: ABP Commercial has a relatively steeper learning curve compared to Laravel. As it follows an integrated modular architecture, developers need to familiarize themselves with its specific patterns and conventions. On the other hand, Laravel has a more intuitive and beginner-friendly learning curve. Its clear syntax and comprehensive documentation make it easier for developers to grasp and quickly start building applications.

  4. Ecosystem and Package Availability: ABP Commercial has a smaller ecosystem compared to Laravel. It offers a limited number of pre-built modules, extensions, and packages, as it focuses more on providing a standardized framework for enterprise-level applications. In contrast, Laravel has a vast ecosystem with a wide range of packages, libraries, and tools readily available. It enables developers to easily integrate third-party solutions and extend the functionality of their applications.

  5. Database Support: ABP Commercial provides support for multiple databases, including SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQLite. It offers a built-in Domain-Driven Design (DDD) approach for database design and management. On the other hand, Laravel also supports multiple databases and provides a seamless integration with popular database management systems. It offers an intuitive database ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) called Eloquent, allowing developers to interact with databases in an expressive way.

  6. Deployment and Scalability: ABP Commercial offers built-in tools and features for deployment and scalability, making it suitable for enterprise-level applications. It provides support for cloud deployment, load balancing, and high availability. Laravel, on the other hand, provides flexibility in deployment options and scalability. It can be easily deployed on various hosting platforms, and its modular structure allows for easy scalability as per the application requirements.

In summary, ABP Commercial and Laravel have distinct differences in terms of architecture, support, learning curve, ecosystem, database support, and deployment/scalability. While ABP Commercial focuses on providing a standardized framework for enterprise-level applications, Laravel offers a more flexible and beginner-friendly approach with a vast ecosystem and strong community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Laravel, ABP Commercial

John
John

Jun 28, 2019

ReviewonLaravelLaravel

I use Laravel because it has integrated unit testing that making TDD a breeze. Having a View (Blade engine) making me easier to work without too many efforts in front-end.

I do recommend going into the root of programming once getting stable on any framework. Go beyond Symfony, go beyond PHP, go into the roots to the mother of programming; c++, c, smalltalk, erlang OTP. Understand the fundamental principle of abstraction.

A framework is just a framework, it helps in getting feedback quickly; like practicing dancing in front of a mirror. Getting fundamentals right is the one true key in doing it right. Programming is not hard, but abstract-programming is extremely hard.

3.85k views3.85k
Comments
Eva
Eva

Fullstack developer

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceonJavaJavaSpring BootSpring BootJavaScriptJavaScript

Hello, I am a fullstack web developer. I have been working for a company with Java/ Spring Boot and client-side JavaScript(mainly jQuery, some AngularJS) for the past 4 years. As I wish to now work as a freelancer, I am faced with a dilemma: which stack to choose given my current knowledge and the state of the market?

I've heard PHP is very popular in the freelance world. I don't know PHP. However, I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to learn since it has many similarities with Java (OOP). It seems to me that Laravel has similarities with Spring Boot (it's MVC and OOP). Also, people say Laravel works well with Vue.js, which is my favorite JS framework.

On the other hand, I already know the Javascript language, and I like Vue.js, so I figure I could go the fullstack Javascript route with ExpressJS. However, I am not sure if these techs are ripe for freelancing (with regards to RAD, stability, reliability, security, costs, etc.) Is it true that Express is almost always used with MongoDB? Because my experience is mostly with SQL databases.

The projects I would like to work on are custom web applications/websites for small businesses. I have developed custom ERPs before and found that Java was a good fit, except for it taking a long time to develop. I cannot make a choice, and I am constantly switching between trying PHP and Node.js/Express. Any real-world advice would be welcome! I would love to find a stack that I enjoy while doing meaningful freelance coding.

826k views826k
Comments
washie
washie

Developer at Bytecom

Jun 14, 2020

Decided

i find python quite resourceful. given the bulk of libraries that python has and the trends of the tech i find django which runs on python to be the framework of choice to the upcoming web services and application. Laravel on the other hand which is powered by PHP is also quite resourceful and great for startups and common web applications.

758k views758k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Laravel
Laravel
ABP Commercial
ABP Commercial

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

It is a complete web development platform based on the ABP framework. It provides pre-built application modules, rapid application development tooling, professional UI themes, premium support and more.

Template Engine; MVC Architecture Support; Eloquent ORM (Object Relational Mapping); Security; Artisan; Libraries & Modular; Database Migration System; Unit-Testing
ABP CLI; Modularity; Multi-Tenancy; Bootstrap Tag Helpers; Dynamic Forms; Authentication & Authorization; Cross-Cutting Concerns; Bundling & Minification; Virtual File System; Theming; Domain-Driven Design Infrastructure; Auto Rest Apis; Dynamic Client Proxies; Distributed Event Bus With RabbitMQ Integration; Test Infrastructure; Audit Logging & Entity Histories; Object To Object Mapping; Email & Sms Abstractions With Templating Support; Aspect-Oriented Programming; Dependency Injection By Conventions; Data Filtering
Statistics
GitHub Stars
82.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
24.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
28.7K
Stacks
21
Followers
23.8K
Followers
63
Votes
3.9K
Votes
31
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 556
    Clean architecture
  • 393
    Growing community
  • 371
    Composer friendly
  • 345
    Open source
  • 326
    The only framework to consider for php
Cons
  • 54
    PHP
  • 33
    Too many dependency
  • 23
    Slower than the other two
  • 17
    A lot of static method calls for convenience
  • 15
    Too many include
Pros
  • 4
    Supports micro-service architecture
  • 4
    Development productivity tools
  • 4
    Rapid development
  • 3
    Enterprise ready, feature rich, pre-built modules
  • 3
    Open source ABP framework behind
Integrations
PHP
PHP
Django
Django
CodeIgniter
CodeIgniter
CakePHP
CakePHP
Blazor
Blazor
.NET Core
.NET Core
MongoDB
MongoDB
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Hangfire
Hangfire
Chartbrew
Chartbrew

What are some alternatives to Laravel, ABP Commercial?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase