StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Amazon Cognito vs Guardian

Amazon Cognito vs Guardian

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon Cognito
Amazon Cognito
Stacks616
Followers917
Votes34
Guardian
Guardian
Stacks7
Followers18
Votes0

Amazon Cognito vs Guardian: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code compares the key differences between Amazon Cognito and Guardian.

1. **User Authentication Mechanism:** Amazon Cognito is a cloud-based service that provides authentication, authorization, and user management for web and mobile applications. On the other hand, Guardian is a 2-factor authentication app that adds an extra layer of security to logins by requiring a code generated on the user's device. 
2. **Scalability:** Amazon Cognito is highly scalable and can support millions of users, making it suitable for large-scale applications. Guardian, being a 2-factor authentication app, is also scalable but its main focus is on providing enhanced security through an additional verification step.
3. **Integration with Services:** Amazon Cognito integrates seamlessly with other AWS services like Amazon S3, DynamoDB, and API Gateway, making it easier for developers to build and manage applications. In contrast, Guardian can be integrated with various platforms and services that support the Time-based One-Time Password (TOTP) protocol.
4. **Cost Model:** Amazon Cognito follows a pay-per-user model, where customers are charged based on the number of users in their application. Guardian, on the other hand, typically follows a subscription-based model where users pay a fixed fee for using the 2-factor authentication service.
5. **Developer Control:** Amazon Cognito provides developers with more control and customization options for user management and authentication workflows through its API and SDKs. On the contrary, Guardian offers a more standardized 2-factor authentication process, limiting developer control over the authentication flow.
6. **Target Audience:** Amazon Cognito is primarily targeted towards developers and businesses looking for a comprehensive solution for user management and authentication in their applications. Guardian, on the other hand, is targeted towards users who are seeking an extra layer of security for their online accounts through 2-factor authentication.

In Summary, Amazon Cognito and Guardian differ in their user authentication mechanisms, scalability, integration capabilities, cost models, developer control, and target audiences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon Cognito, Guardian

Brent
Brent

CEO at DEFY Labs

Mar 7, 2020

Decided

I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.

When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.

The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.

297k views297k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon Cognito
Amazon Cognito
Guardian
Guardian

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

Avoid dealing with OAuth logic in your code, and spend more time creating your product. Guardian reduces the OAuth footprint in your code to a single request. Built with modularity in mind, Guardian leverages plugins to handle OAuth flows, should you encounter a flow that Guardian doesn't handle, create a small flow plugin to do so and carry on. Guardian comes with 5 pre-made plugins that cover 99% of OAuth services.

Manage Unique Identities;Work Offline;Store and Sync across Devices;Seamless Guest Access;Safeguard AWS Credentials;Control Access to AWS Resources
Perfect for both production and testing;Guardian is centralized and easily configurable to allow multiple environments giving you the flexibility you need
Statistics
Stacks
616
Stacks
7
Followers
917
Followers
18
Votes
34
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Backed by Amazon
  • 7
    Manage Unique Identities
  • 4
    Work Offline
  • 3
    MFA
  • 2
    Store and Sync
Cons
  • 4
    Massive Pain to get working
  • 3
    Documentation often out of date
  • 2
    Login-UI sparsely customizable (e.g. no translation)
  • 1
    Difficult to customize (basic-pack is more than humble)
  • 1
    MFA: there is no "forget device" function
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Amazon Cognito, Guardian?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope