StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Amazon Cognito vs Passport

Amazon Cognito vs Passport

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon Cognito
Amazon Cognito
Stacks616
Followers917
Votes34
Passport
Passport
Stacks471
Followers368
Votes0
GitHub Stars23.5K
Forks1.2K

Amazon Cognito vs Passport: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this markdown document, I will provide the key differences between Amazon Cognito and Passport. Both Amazon Cognito and Passport are authentication solutions used in web development, but they have several differences that set them apart.

  1. Setup and Integration: Amazon Cognito is a fully-managed service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), while Passport is a middleware for Node.js web frameworks. To use Amazon Cognito, you need to set up an AWS account and configure the service. On the other hand, Passport can be easily integrated into your Node.js application using its middleware and various authentication strategies.

  2. Scalability and Complexity: Amazon Cognito is designed to handle scalable authentication and user management for millions of users. It provides built-in support for federated identity providers, such as Facebook and Google, as well as custom authentication flows. Passport, on the other hand, is a lightweight and flexible middleware that requires you to implement your own authentication and user management logic. While it offers flexibility, it may require more development effort for handling scalability and complex authentication requirements.

  3. Vendor Lock-in: Amazon Cognito is a proprietary service provided by AWS, which means you may experience vendor lock-in if you decide to use it. Your application's authentication and user data will be tied to the AWS ecosystem. In contrast, Passport is an open-source library that can be used with any web framework and authentication strategy. It provides more flexibility and avoids vendor lock-in.

  4. Authentication Strategies: Amazon Cognito provides various authentication flows and supports federated identity providers, including social media platforms, such as Facebook and Google, as well as enterprise identity providers, such as Active Directory. It also supports multi-factor authentication and adaptive authentication. Passport, on the other hand, allows you to choose from a wide range of authentication strategies, such as local username/password, OAuth, OpenID Connect, and more. The availability of authentication strategies may vary depending on the specific Passport strategy plugins you choose to integrate.

  5. Data Storage: Amazon Cognito provides a user pool that manages user accounts and their associated data, such as usernames, passwords, and attributes. It also offers various features, such as user sign-up and sign-in APIs, password reset flows, and user management interfaces. Passport does not provide built-in user account management or data storage capabilities. You need to implement your own user model and data storage logic using a database or other storage mechanisms.

  6. Pricing and Cost: Amazon Cognito follows a pay-per-use pricing model, where you pay for the number of monthly active users and the amount of data stored. Passport, being an open-source middleware, does not have any direct cost associated with it. However, you may need to consider the cost of any additional services or infrastructure you use alongside Passport, such as a database for user data storage.

In summary, Amazon Cognito is a managed service provided by AWS that offers scalable authentication, user management, and integration with various identity providers, but it comes with potential vendor lock-in. Passport, on the other hand, is an open-source middleware that provides flexibility and choice in authentication strategies, but requires more development effort for scalability and complex authentication requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon Cognito, Passport

Vaibhav
Vaibhav

Jul 17, 2020

Needs advice

Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?

As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?

220k views220k
Comments
Brent
Brent

CEO at DEFY Labs

Mar 7, 2020

Decided

I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.

When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.

The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.

297k views297k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon Cognito
Amazon Cognito
Passport
Passport

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

It is authentication middleware for Node.js. Extremely flexible and modular, It can be unobtrusively dropped in to any Express-based web application. A comprehensive set of strategies support authentication using a username and password, Facebook, Twitter, and more.

Manage Unique Identities;Work Offline;Store and Sync across Devices;Seamless Guest Access;Safeguard AWS Credentials;Control Access to AWS Resources
Single sign-on with OpenID and OAuth; Easily handle success and failure
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
23.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.2K
Stacks
616
Stacks
471
Followers
917
Followers
368
Votes
34
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Backed by Amazon
  • 7
    Manage Unique Identities
  • 4
    Work Offline
  • 3
    MFA
  • 2
    Store and Sync
Cons
  • 4
    Massive Pain to get working
  • 3
    Documentation often out of date
  • 2
    Login-UI sparsely customizable (e.g. no translation)
  • 1
    Difficult to customize (basic-pack is more than humble)
  • 1
    MFA: there is no "forget device" function
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Vue.js
Vue.js
JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token

What are some alternatives to Amazon Cognito, Passport?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope