StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Amazon Timestream vs MongoDB

Amazon Timestream vs MongoDB

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MongoDB
MongoDB
Stacks96.6K
Followers82.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars27.7K
Forks5.7K
Amazon Timestream
Amazon Timestream
Stacks13
Followers50
Votes0

Amazon Timestream vs MongoDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Amazon Timestream and MongoDB. Both are popular databases used for different purposes, and understanding their unique features and functionalities can help in choosing the right database for specific use cases.

  1. Scalability and Performance: One of the major differences between Amazon Timestream and MongoDB is their scalability and performance capabilities. Amazon Timestream is built specifically for handling time-series data and is optimized for storing and querying large volumes of time-stamped data. It offers automatic scaling to accommodate the growing dataset and high write/read throughput. On the other hand, MongoDB is a general-purpose database that can handle various types of data, but it may require additional configuration and manual scaling to handle time-series data efficiently.

  2. Data Model: Another significant difference lies in the data model of both databases. Amazon Timestream has a unique data model designed specifically for time-series data. It stores data in tables and allows for easy querying on time-based dimensions like time intervals, time windows, and time-series hierarchy. MongoDB, on the other hand, follows a document-based model where data is stored in flexible JSON-like documents. It offers more flexibility in terms of schema design but may require additional effort to query time-series data efficiently.

  3. Querying Capabilities: When it comes to querying time-series data, Amazon Timestream provides several built-in functions and capabilities for analyzing time-series patterns. It allows for efficient querying based on time intervals, aggregations, filtering, and joins using a SQL-like syntax. MongoDB, on the other hand, provides a rich query language that supports complex queries and aggregations but may require additional effort to optimize queries specific to time-series data.

  4. Cost and Pricing Model: The cost and pricing model of Amazon Timestream and MongoDB also differ. Amazon Timestream is a managed service provided by AWS, and its pricing is based on factors like data ingestion, storage, and query execution. MongoDB can be deployed on different platforms, including self-managed deployments and cloud-based services like MongoDB Atlas. The pricing for MongoDB depends on factors like the deployment option, storage size, and additional features.

  5. Integration with Ecosystem: Both Amazon Timestream and MongoDB can integrate with various tools and services in their respective ecosystems, but they have different integration capabilities. Amazon Timestream integrates seamlessly with other AWS services like Amazon CloudWatch, AWS Lambda, and Amazon Quicksight, making it easier to build end-to-end solutions within the AWS ecosystem. MongoDB, on the other hand, has a wide range of integrations with popular tools and frameworks, including connectors for BI tools, data replication, and integration with various programming languages.

  6. Maturity and Community Support: The maturity and community support for Amazon Timestream and MongoDB also differ. MongoDB has been around for several years and has a large community of users and contributors providing support and resources. It has a well-established ecosystem with extensive documentation, forums, and user groups. Amazon Timestream, being a relatively new service, is still developing its community and resources, although it benefits from the broader AWS community.

In Summary, Amazon Timestream and MongoDB differ in terms of scalability, data model, querying capabilities, cost and pricing model, integration with the ecosystem, and maturity/community support. Understanding these differences can help in choosing the right database depending on specific use cases and requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

MongoDB
MongoDB
Amazon Timestream
Amazon Timestream

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

It is a fast, scalable, and serverless time series database service for IoT and operational applications that makes it easy to store and analyze trillions of events per day up to 1,000 times faster and at as little as 1/10th the cost of relational databases. It saves you time and cost in managing the lifecycle of time series data by keeping recent data in memory and moving historical data to a cost optimized storage tier based upon user defined policies.

Flexible data model, expressive query language, secondary indexes, replication, auto-sharding, in-place updates, aggregation, GridFS
High performance at low cost; Serverless with auto-scaling; Data lifecycle management; Simplified data access; Purpose-built for time series; Always encrypted
Statistics
GitHub Stars
27.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
96.6K
Stacks
13
Followers
82.0K
Followers
50
Votes
4.1K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 829
    Document-oriented storage
  • 594
    No sql
  • 554
    Ease of use
  • 465
    Fast
  • 410
    High performance
Cons
  • 6
    Very slowly for connected models that require joins
  • 3
    Not acid compliant
  • 2
    Proprietary query language
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Amazon Kinesis
Amazon Kinesis
Grafana
Grafana
Amazon SageMaker
Amazon SageMaker
Amazon Quicksight
Amazon Quicksight
Apache Flink
Apache Flink

What are some alternatives to MongoDB, Amazon Timestream?

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase