StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript Framework Components
  5. Angular Material vs Angular Universal

Angular Material vs Angular Universal

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Angular Material
Angular Material
Stacks624
Followers755
Votes32
GitHub Stars24.9K
Forks6.8K
Angular Universal
Angular Universal
Stacks329
Followers413
Votes36
GitHub Stars99.2K
Forks26.7K

Angular Material vs Angular Universal: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Angular Material and Angular Universal are two popular tools in the Angular ecosystem. Angular Material is a UI component library that provides high-quality components for Angular applications, while Angular Universal is a server-side rendering solution for Angular applications.

  1. Rendering Environment: Angular Material focuses on providing UI components for front-end development, while Angular Universal is specifically designed to enable server-side rendering of Angular applications. This means that Angular Material is primarily used for creating visually appealing user interfaces, while Angular Universal enhances performance and SEO by rendering pages on the server side.

  2. UI Components vs. Server-Side Rendering: One key difference is that Angular Material offers a wide range of pre-built UI components like buttons, cards, and dialogs to streamline front-end development, whereas Angular Universal optimizes Angular apps for server-side rendering, improving performance and facilitating better search engine optimization.

  3. Focus on User Experience: Angular Material emphasizes creating visually appealing and interactive user interfaces by providing a library of ready-to-use components with a consistent design language. In contrast, Angular Universal focuses on improving the performance and SEO of Angular applications by rendering pages on the server side, which enhances the overall user experience.

  4. Impact on SEO: Angular Universal's server-side rendering capability significantly impacts SEO by allowing search engines to crawl and index Angular application pages more effectively, resulting in improved search engine rankings. On the other hand, Angular Material primarily focuses on enhancing the visual appeal and usability of user interfaces without directly affecting SEO.

  5. Performance Optimization: Angular Universal plays a crucial role in optimizing the performance of Angular applications by rendering pages on the server side, reducing initial loading times, and improving the overall speed of the application. In contrast, while Angular Material enhances the user interface experience, it does not directly contribute to performance optimization through server-side rendering.

  6. Technical Implementation: Angular Material is primarily used for front-end development and requires integration with Angular applications to incorporate its UI components, while Angular Universal involves setting up a server-side rendering configuration to improve performance and SEO. The technical implementation of Angular Material is focused on enhancing the visual aspects of the application, whereas Angular Universal's implementation revolves around server-side rendering principles.

In Summary, Angular Material and Angular Universal differ in their focus on UI components vs. server-side rendering, user experience enhancement vs. performance optimization, impact on SEO, and the technical implementation required for integration within Angular applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Angular Material
Angular Material
Angular Universal
Angular Universal

Sprint from Zero to App. Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. It allows to create material styled angular apps fast and easy.

It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive.

Easy to use ; comprehensive & modern UI components ; UI components work across the web, mobile and desktop; material styled angular apps fast and easy
server-side rendering using the Angular CLI; renders more quickly
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.9K
GitHub Stars
99.2K
GitHub Forks
6.8K
GitHub Forks
26.7K
Stacks
624
Stacks
329
Followers
755
Followers
413
Votes
32
Votes
36
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 12
    Components
  • 8
    Backed by a well known company
  • 4
    Simple
  • 3
    Easy
  • 2
    Rte
Cons
  • 4
    Fairly large
  • 2
    Look like 90s stuffs
  • 2
    Shit
  • 2
    Suck
Pros
  • 7
    Typescript
  • 5
    Complete Framework
  • 5
    Server rendering and code splitting
  • 4
    Same existing code base for both SPA and SSR
  • 4
    Static site generator
Integrations
Angular CLI
Angular CLI
Angular
Angular
.NET Core
.NET Core
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Angular Material , Angular Universal?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase