StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Angular Universal vs Emotion

Angular Universal vs Emotion

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Angular Universal
Angular Universal
Stacks329
Followers413
Votes36
GitHub Stars99.2K
Forks26.7K
Emotion
Emotion
Stacks313
Followers239
Votes3
GitHub Stars17.9K
Forks1.1K

Angular Universal vs Emotion: What are the differences?

Angular Universal: A technology that renders Angular applications on the server. It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive; Emotion: The Next Generation of CSS in JS. Emotion is a performant and flexible CSS-in-JS library. Building on many other CSS-in-JS libraries, it allows you to style apps quickly with string or object styles. It has predictable composition to avoid specificity issues with CSS. With source maps and labels, Emotion has a great developer experience and great performance with heavy caching in production.

Angular Universal and Emotion can be primarily classified as "JavaScript Framework Components" tools.

Angular Universal and Emotion are both open source tools. It seems that Angular Universal with 50.1K GitHub stars and 13.9K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Emotion with 8.62K GitHub stars and 544 GitHub forks.

According to the StackShare community, Emotion has a broader approval, being mentioned in 17 company stacks & 28 developers stacks; compared to Angular Universal, which is listed in 7 company stacks and 10 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Angular Universal
Angular Universal
Emotion
Emotion

It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive.

Emotion is a performant and flexible CSS-in-JS library. Building on many other CSS-in-JS libraries, it allows you to style apps quickly with string or object styles. It has predictable composition to avoid specificity issues with CSS. With source maps and labels, Emotion has a great developer experience and great performance with heavy caching in production.

server-side rendering using the Angular CLI; renders more quickly
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
99.2K
GitHub Stars
17.9K
GitHub Forks
26.7K
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
329
Stacks
313
Followers
413
Followers
239
Votes
36
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Typescript
  • 5
    Server rendering and code splitting
  • 5
    Complete Framework
  • 4
    Dynamic rendering
  • 4
    Static site generator
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to use
Integrations
.NET Core
.NET Core
PHP
PHP
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Angular Universal, Emotion?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase