StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Angular Universal vs tachyons

Angular Universal vs tachyons

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

tachyons
tachyons
Stacks70
Followers79
Votes0
GitHub Stars11.7K
Forks675
Angular Universal
Angular Universal
Stacks329
Followers413
Votes36
GitHub Stars99.2K
Forks26.7K

Angular Universal vs tachyons: What are the differences?

<Angular Universal and Tachyons are two popular tools in web development that serve different purposes. Angular Universal is a server-side rendering solution for Angular applications, while Tachyons is a CSS toolkit for designing responsive web interfaces. Below are the key differences between Angular Universal and Tachyons:>

  1. Technology Usage: Angular Universal is a technology used for server-side rendering of Angular applications, allowing the server to pre-render pages and improve performance, SEO, and user experience. On the other hand, Tachyons is a front-end framework that provides a set of utility classes to quickly style and design web interfaces without writing custom CSS.

  2. Purpose: Angular Universal is primarily focused on optimizing the rendering process of Angular applications by pre-rendering pages on the server side, while Tachyons aims to streamline the design process by offering a collection of CSS classes that can be applied directly to HTML elements for styling.

  3. Dependencies: Angular Universal is tightly integrated with Angular and requires Angular applications to be set up and configured specifically for server-side rendering, involving additional dependencies and setup. In contrast, Tachyons is a standalone CSS toolkit that can be easily added to any web project without any dependency on a specific front-end framework.

  4. Flexibility: Angular Universal offers more flexibility in terms of server-side rendering and optimizing Angular applications for performance and SEO, providing developers with advanced tools and features for improving overall application rendering. Tachyons, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and ease of use, offering a lightweight CSS framework that emphasizes speed and efficiency in design implementation.

  5. Learning Curve: Implementing and configuring Angular Universal requires a certain level of familiarity with Angular and server-side rendering concepts, making it more challenging for beginners or developers new to Angular development. Tachyons, on the other hand, has a shallow learning curve, allowing developers of all levels to quickly grasp and utilize its utility classes for designing responsive interfaces.

In Summary, Angular Universal is a server-side rendering technology for Angular applications, while Tachyons is a CSS toolkit for designing responsive web interfaces, offering different approaches to web development with distinct focuses on performance optimization and design simplicity, respectively.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

tachyons
tachyons
Angular Universal
Angular Universal

Create fast loading, highly readable, and 100% responsive interfaces with as little CSS as possible.

It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive.

Mobile-first css architecture; 490 accessible color combinations; 8px baseline grid;
server-side rendering using the Angular CLI; renders more quickly
Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.7K
GitHub Stars
99.2K
GitHub Forks
675
GitHub Forks
26.7K
Stacks
70
Stacks
329
Followers
79
Followers
413
Votes
0
Votes
36
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 7
    Typescript
  • 5
    Server rendering and code splitting
  • 5
    Complete Framework
  • 4
    Dynamic rendering
  • 4
    Static site generator
Integrations
PostCSS
PostCSS
HTML5
HTML5
.NET Core
.NET Core
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to tachyons, Angular Universal?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase