Apache Oozie vs Github Actions

Overview

Apache Oozie

Stacks40

Followers76

Votes0

GitHub Actions

Stacks48.2K

Followers3.1K

Votes27

Apache Oozie vs Github Actions: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Workflow Management: Apache Oozie is a workflow scheduler system used to manage Hadoop jobs, whereas GitHub Actions is a CI/CD automation tool that allows you to create custom workflows for your repositories. Oozie focuses on coordinating and managing complex job workflows in Hadoop, while GitHub Actions is tailored towards automating tasks and processes within your software development workflow.
Integration with Git Repositories: Github Actions excels in integrating with GitHub repositories as it is a native feature of the GitHub platform, making it seamless and efficient to set up workflows for your repositories. On the other hand, Apache Oozie needs to be separately installed and configured to work with Hadoop clusters, which may require additional setup and maintenance.
Use Cases: Oozie is primarily used in data processing tasks such as ETL (extract, transform, load), data ingestion, and processing in Hadoop ecosystems. It is tailored for managing batch and streaming data processing workflows. On the contrary, GitHub Actions is more focused on automation and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines within the software development lifecycle, allowing you to automate build, test, and deployment processes.
Community Support: GitHub Actions benefits from a large and active community of developers who contribute plugins, workflows, and documentation to enhance the capabilities of the tool. This community support can provide valuable resources and insights into best practices for utilizing GitHub Actions effectively. Apache Oozie, while having its own community, may have a smaller and more specialized user base due to its focus on big data processing.
Maintenance Overhead: When using GitHub Actions, the infrastructure and maintenance aspects are handled by GitHub, reducing the operational overhead for the user. On the other hand, Apache Oozie requires the user to manage and maintain the infrastructure for running workflows on Hadoop clusters, which can involve monitoring, scaling, and ensuring high availability of the system.
Execution Environment: GitHub Actions runs workflows in a cloud-based environment provided by GitHub, offering scalability and flexibility in resource allocation for running your workflows. In comparison, Apache Oozie executes workflows within the Hadoop ecosystem, which may require specific configurations and setup to leverage the computing power of the Hadoop cluster effectively.

In Summary, Apache Oozie and GitHub Actions differ in their focus on workflow management, integration with repositories, use cases, community support, maintenance overhead, and execution environment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Apache Oozie, GitHub Actions

Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

CircleCI

Drone.io

GitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache Oozie	GitHub Actions
It is a server-based workflow scheduling system to manage Hadoop jobs. Workflows in it are defined as a collection of control flow and action nodes in a directed acyclic graph. Control flow nodes define the beginning and the end of a workflow as well as a mechanism to control the workflow execution path.	It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.
-	Multiple workflow files support; Free and open source; Workflow run interface; Search for actions in GitHub Marketplace; Integrated with Github's Checks API; Logs and artifacts downloading support
Statistics
Stacks 40	Stacks 48.2K
Followers 76	Followers 3.1K
Votes 0	Votes 27
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 8 Integration with GitHub 5 Free 3 Easy to duplicate a workflow 3 Ready actions in Marketplace 2 Read actions in Marketplace Cons 5 Lacking [skip ci] 4 Lacking allow failure 3 Lacking job specific badges 2 No ssh login to servers 1 No manual launch
Integrations
No integrations available	GitHub

What are some alternatives to Apache Oozie, GitHub Actions?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Airflow

Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Related Comparisons

Apache Oozie vs Github Actions: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Workflow Management: Apache Oozie is a workflow scheduler system used to manage Hadoop jobs, whereas GitHub Actions is a CI/CD automation tool that allows you to create custom workflows for your repositories. Oozie focuses on coordinating and managing complex job workflows in Hadoop, while GitHub Actions is tailored towards automating tasks and processes within your software development workflow.
Integration with Git Repositories: Github Actions excels in integrating with GitHub repositories as it is a native feature of the GitHub platform, making it seamless and efficient to set up workflows for your repositories. On the other hand, Apache Oozie needs to be separately installed and configured to work with Hadoop clusters, which may require additional setup and maintenance.
Use Cases: Oozie is primarily used in data processing tasks such as ETL (extract, transform, load), data ingestion, and processing in Hadoop ecosystems. It is tailored for managing batch and streaming data processing workflows. On the contrary, GitHub Actions is more focused on automation and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines within the software development lifecycle, allowing you to automate build, test, and deployment processes.
Community Support: GitHub Actions benefits from a large and active community of developers who contribute plugins, workflows, and documentation to enhance the capabilities of the tool. This community support can provide valuable resources and insights into best practices for utilizing GitHub Actions effectively. Apache Oozie, while having its own community, may have a smaller and more specialized user base due to its focus on big data processing.
Maintenance Overhead: When using GitHub Actions, the infrastructure and maintenance aspects are handled by GitHub, reducing the operational overhead for the user. On the other hand, Apache Oozie requires the user to manage and maintain the infrastructure for running workflows on Hadoop clusters, which can involve monitoring, scaling, and ensuring high availability of the system.
Execution Environment: GitHub Actions runs workflows in a cloud-based environment provided by GitHub, offering scalability and flexibility in resource allocation for running your workflows. In comparison, Apache Oozie executes workflows within the Hadoop ecosystem, which may require specific configurations and setup to leverage the computing power of the Hadoop cluster effectively.

In Summary, Apache Oozie and GitHub Actions differ in their focus on workflow management, integration with repositories, use cases, community support, maintenance overhead, and execution environment.

Apache Oozie vs Github Actions

Overview