StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Serverless
  4. Serverless Task Processing
  5. Apache OpenWhisk vs Laravel Vapor

Apache OpenWhisk vs Laravel Vapor

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache OpenWhisk
Apache OpenWhisk
Stacks58
Followers149
Votes7
Laravel Vapor
Laravel Vapor
Stacks45
Followers48
Votes0

Apache OpenWhisk vs Laravel Vapor: What are the differences?

# Apache OpenWhisk vs. Laravel Vapor

Apache OpenWhisk and Laravel Vapor are two popular serverless platforms used for deploying applications. Despite both offering serverless solutions, there are key differences that set them apart.

1. **Pricing Model**: Apache OpenWhisk follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are billed based on the resources consumed. In contrast, Laravel Vapor offers a fixed monthly pricing plan, providing predictability in costs for users.

2. **Programming Languages**: Apache OpenWhisk supports a wide range of programming languages including Node.js, Python, and Swift, allowing users to choose the language that best fits their needs. On the other hand, Laravel Vapor is specifically designed for PHP applications, limiting the language options available to users.

3. **Development Environment**: Apache OpenWhisk provides a local development environment for developers to test their functions locally before deploying them. Laravel Vapor, on the other hand, does not offer a local development environment, requiring developers to deploy their application to Vapor for testing.

4. **Vendor Lock-in**: Apache OpenWhisk is an open-source platform that can be deployed on various cloud providers, allowing users to avoid vendor lock-in. In contrast, Laravel Vapor is a platform provided by Laravel, which may lead to some level of vendor lock-in for users.

5. **Scalability**: Apache OpenWhisk is highly scalable, supporting auto-scaling based on workload demands, ensuring efficient resource utilization. Laravel Vapor, while capable of scaling, may have limitations in scaling compared to OpenWhisk's ability to handle sudden spikes in traffic.

6. **Community Support**: Apache OpenWhisk has a large and active community providing support, resources, and plugins for users. In comparison, Laravel Vapor being a newer platform may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for users seeking assistance. 

In Summary, Apache OpenWhisk and Laravel Vapor differ in their pricing model, programming language support, development environment, vendor lock-in, scalability, and community support, providing users with options based on their specific requirements.  

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache OpenWhisk
Apache OpenWhisk
Laravel Vapor
Laravel Vapor

OpenWhisk is an open source serverless platform. It is enterprise grade and accessible to all developers thanks to its superior programming model and tooling. It powers IBM Cloud Functions, Adobe I/O Runtime, Naver, Nimbella among others.

It is an auto-scaling, serverless deployment platform for Laravel, powered by AWS Lambda. Manage your Laravel infrastructure on Vapor and fall in love with the scalability and simplicity of serverless.

Serverless functions;FaaS;Fine-grained resource consumption;Use any language;Containers as functions; service;Functions-as-a-Service;Function composition;Step Functions;Docker;Kubernetes;Open source community;Apache
Auto-scaling web / queue infrastructure fine tuned for Laravel; Zero-downtime deployments and rollbacks; Environment variable / secret management; Database management, including point-in-time restores and scaling; Redis Cache management, including cluster scaling; Database and cache tunnels, allowing for easy local inspection; Automatic uploading of assets to Cloudfront CDN during deployment; Unique, Vapor assigned vanity URLs for each environment, allowing immediate inspection; Custom application domains; DNS management; Certificate management and renewal; Application, database, and cache metrics; CI friendly
Statistics
Stacks
58
Stacks
45
Followers
149
Followers
48
Votes
7
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    You are not tied to a provider. IBM available however
  • 3
    Still exploring... its just intresting
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
JavaScript
JavaScript
Python
Python
npm
npm
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
Swift
Swift
Java
Java
Slack
Slack
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Laravel
Laravel

What are some alternatives to Apache OpenWhisk, Laravel Vapor?

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda is a compute service that runs your code in response to events and automatically manages the underlying compute resources for you. You can use AWS Lambda to extend other AWS services with custom logic, or create your own back-end services that operate at AWS scale, performance, and security.

Azure Functions

Azure Functions

Azure Functions is an event driven, compute-on-demand experience that extends the existing Azure application platform with capabilities to implement code triggered by events occurring in virtually any Azure or 3rd party service as well as on-premises systems.

Google Cloud Run

Google Cloud Run

A managed compute platform that enables you to run stateless containers that are invocable via HTTP requests. It's serverless by abstracting away all infrastructure management.

Serverless

Serverless

Build applications comprised of microservices that run in response to events, auto-scale for you, and only charge you when they run. This lowers the total cost of maintaining your apps, enabling you to build more logic, faster. The Framework uses new event-driven compute services, like AWS Lambda, Google CloudFunctions, and more.

Google Cloud Functions

Google Cloud Functions

Construct applications from bite-sized business logic billed to the nearest 100 milliseconds, only while your code is running

Knative

Knative

Knative provides a set of middleware components that are essential to build modern, source-centric, and container-based applications that can run anywhere: on premises, in the cloud, or even in a third-party data center

OpenFaaS

OpenFaaS

Serverless Functions Made Simple for Docker and Kubernetes

Nuclio

Nuclio

nuclio is portable across IoT devices, laptops, on-premises datacenters and cloud deployments, eliminating cloud lock-ins and enabling hybrid solutions.

Cloud Functions for Firebase

Cloud Functions for Firebase

Cloud Functions for Firebase lets you create functions that are triggered by Firebase products, such as changes to data in the Realtime Database, uploads to Cloud Storage, new user sign ups via Authentication, and conversion events in Analytics.

AWS Batch

AWS Batch

It enables developers, scientists, and engineers to easily and efficiently run hundreds of thousands of batch computing jobs on AWS. It dynamically provisions the optimal quantity and type of compute resources (e.g., CPU or memory optimized instances) based on the volume and specific resource requirements of the batch jobs submitted.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase