StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
Apache Pulsar
ByApache-pulsarApache-pulsar

Apache Pulsar

#24in Background Jobs
Discussions1
Followers199
OverviewDiscussions1AdoptionAlternativesIntegrations
Try It

What is Apache Pulsar?

Apache Pulsar is a distributed messaging solution developed and released to open source at Yahoo. Pulsar supports both pub-sub messaging and queuing in a platform designed for performance, scalability, and ease of development and operation.

Apache Pulsar is a tool in the Background Jobs category of a tech stack.

Key Features

Unified model supporting pub-sub messaging and queuingEasy scalability to millions of topicsNative multi-datacenter replicationMulti-language client APIGuaranteed data durabilityScalable distributed storage leveraging Apache BookKeeper

Apache Pulsar Pros & Cons

Pros of Apache Pulsar

  • ✓Simple
  • ✓Scalable
  • ✓High-throughput
  • ✓Geo-replication
  • ✓Multi-tenancy
  • ✓Easy to deploy
  • ✓Fast
  • ✓Horizontally scaleable
  • ✓Pulsar Functions
  • ✓Secure

Cons of Apache Pulsar

  • ✗LImited Language support(6)
  • ✗No guaranteed dliefvery
  • ✗No one and only one delivery
  • ✗Not jms compliant
  • ✗Only Supports Topics
  • ✗Very few commercial vendors for support

Apache Pulsar Alternatives & Comparisons

What are some alternatives to Apache Pulsar?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

MQTT

MQTT

It was designed as an extremely lightweight publish/subscribe messaging transport. It is useful for connections with remote locations where a small code footprint is required and/or network bandwidth is at a premium.

Try It

Visit Website

Adoption

On StackShare

Apache Pulsar Integrations

StreamSets, RisingWave, Metarank, Apache Pinot are some of the popular tools that integrate with Apache Pulsar. Here's a list of all 4 tools that integrate with Apache Pulsar.

StreamSets
StreamSets
RisingWave
RisingWave
Metarank
Metarank
Apache Pinot
Apache Pinot

Apache Pulsar Discussions

Discover why developers choose Apache Pulsar. Read real-world technical decisions and stack choices from the StackShare community.

Marc Bollinger
Marc Bollinger

Infra & Data Eng Manager at Lumosity

Dec 3, 2018

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsRubyRubyKafkaKafka

Lumosity is home to the world's largest cognitive training database, a responsibility we take seriously. For most of the company's history, our analysis of user behavior and training data has been powered by an event stream--first a simple Node.js pub/sub app, then a heavyweight Ruby app with stronger durability. Both supported decent throughput and latency, but they lacked some major features supported by existing open-source alternatives: replaying existing messages (also lacking in most message queue-based solutions), scaling out many different readers for the same stream, the ability to leverage existing solutions for reading and writing, and possibly most importantly: the ability to hire someone externally who already had expertise.

We ultimately migrated to Kafka in early- to mid-2016, citing both industry trends in companies we'd talked to with similar durability and throughput needs, the extremely strong documentation and community. We pored over Kyle Kingsbury's Jepsen post (https://aphyr.com/posts/293-jepsen-Kafka), as well as Jay Kreps' follow-up (http://blog.empathybox.com/post/62279088548/a-few-notes-on-kafka-and-jepsen), talked at length with Confluent folks and community members, and still wound up running parallel systems for quite a long time, but ultimately, we've been very, very happy. Understanding the internals and proper levers takes some commitment, but it's taken very little maintenance once configured. Since then, the Confluent Platform community has grown and grown; we've gone from doing most development using custom Scala consumers and producers to being 60/40 Kafka Streams/Connects.

We originally looked into Apache Storm / Heron , and we'd moved on from Redis pub/sub. Heron looks great, but we already had a programming model across services that was more akin to consuming a message consumers than required a topology of bolts, etc. Heron also had just come out while we were starting to migrate things, and the community momentum and direction of Kafka felt more substantial than the older Storm. If we were to start the process over again today, we might check out Apache Pulsar , although the ecosystem is much younger.

To find out more, read our 2017 engineering blog post about the migration!

0 views0
Comments
Companies
15
PMDPZF+9
Developers
98
AEPMAR+92