StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Version Control
  4. Git Tools
  5. Atlassian Stash vs GitQlient

Atlassian Stash vs GitQlient

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Atlassian Stash
Atlassian Stash
Stacks76
Followers77
Votes0
GitQlient
GitQlient
Stacks1
Followers9
Votes0

Atlassian Stash vs GitQlient: What are the differences?

Introduction

When choosing between Atlassian Stash and GitQlient for version control, understanding the key differences can help in making an informed decision.

  1. Integration with Atlassian Products: Atlassian Stash, now known as Bitbucket Server, seamlessly integrates with other Atlassian products such as Jira and Confluence, providing a more cohesive workflow for development teams. GitQlient, on the other hand, is an independent, standalone Git client without any built-in integration with Atlassian suite or other project management tools. This difference can be crucial for teams already using Atlassian products for project management.

  2. User Interface and Features: Atlassian Stash offers a comprehensive set of features like pull requests, branching strategies, and code reviews with an intuitive and user-friendly interface. GitQlient, while being a lightweight and minimalistic Git client, may lack some advanced features provided by Stash, making it more suitable for users looking for a simple and streamlined version control tool without any added complexity.

  3. Community and Support: Atlassian Stash, being a part of the Atlassian ecosystem, has a strong community support system, regular updates, and extensive documentation. GitQlient, being an independent project, may not have as active a community or as frequent updates as Stash, which could potentially impact the availability of support and resources for users facing issues or seeking guidance.

  4. Cost and Licensing: Atlassian Stash typically involves licensing fees for enterprise usage or larger teams, while GitQlient is an open-source tool available for free without any licensing costs. For organizations on a budget or individuals looking for a cost-effective solution, GitQlient may be a more attractive option compared to the licensing costs associated with Atlassian Stash.

  5. Customization and Extensions: Atlassian Stash provides a range of customization options and integrations through plugins and extensions available in the Atlassian Marketplace. GitQlient, being a simpler and lightweight tool, may not offer as many customization or extension options, potentially limiting its adaptability to specific workflows or integration requirements that users might have.

  6. Scalability and Performance: Atlassian Stash is designed to handle large repositories and support scalability for growing teams and projects, with features like repository permissions and fine-grained access control. GitQlient, being a lightweight client, may have limitations in terms of scalability and performance when dealing with extensive codebases or multiple contributors, making it more suitable for smaller projects or individual developers.

In Summary, the key differences between Atlassian Stash and GitQlient lie in their integration with other tools, user interface and features, community support, costs, customization options, and scalability/performance capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Atlassian Stash
Atlassian Stash
GitQlient
GitQlient

It is a centralized solution to manage Git repositories behind the firewall. Streamlined for small agile teams, powerful enough for large organizations.

It is a multi-platform Git client originally forked from QGit. The original idea was to provide a GUI-oriented Git client that was easy to integrate with QtCreator (currently shipped as GitQlientPlugin). This idea has grown since the day 1 to not only cover the integration with QtCreator but also to make it an app on it’s own.

Centralized solution to manage Git repositories ;Streamlined for small agile teams;Powerful enough for large organizations
Easy access to remote actions like: push, pull, submodules management and branches; Branches management; Tags and stashes management; Submodules handling; Allow to open several repositories in the same window; Better visualization of the commits and the work in progress; Better visualization of the repository view
Statistics
Stacks
76
Stacks
1
Followers
77
Followers
9
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Git
Git
Jira
Jira
OpenLDAP
OpenLDAP
Bamboo
Bamboo
Git
Git
Qt Creator
Qt Creator

What are some alternatives to Atlassian Stash, GitQlient?

Diff So Fancy

Diff So Fancy

diff-so-fancy builds on the good-lookin' output of git contrib's diff-highlight to upgrade your diffs' appearances.

TortoiseGit

TortoiseGit

It is a Git revision control client, implemented as a Windows shell extension and based on TortoiseSVN. It is free software released under the GNU General Public License.

GitUI

GitUI

It is a blazing fast terminal-UI for git written in Rust. You can inspect, commit, and amend changes. It has context-based help (no need to memorize tons of hot-keys).

pre-commit by Yelp

pre-commit by Yelp

If one of your developers doesn’t have node installed but modifies a JavaScript file, pre-commit automatically handles downloading and building node to run jshint without root. Pre-commit is a multi-language package manager for pre-commit hooks. You specify a list of hooks you want and pre-commit manages the installation and execution of any hook written in any language before every commit. pre-commit is specifically designed to not require root access.

ungit

ungit

Clean and intuitive UI that makes it easy to understand git.

rebase-editor

rebase-editor

Simple terminal based sequence editor for git interactive rebase. Written in Node.js, published to npm, uses terminal-kit.

hub

hub

hub is a command line tool that wraps git in order to extend it with extra features and commands that make working with GitHub easier.

Check It Out

Check It Out

Check It Out lets you interactively see and choose what branch you want to check out without the hassle of trying to type out a long or confusing branch name. Checking out branches just got even simpler!

hug-scm

hug-scm

A humane, intuitive interface for Git and other version control systems. Hug transforms complex and forgettable Git commands into a simple, predictable language that feels natural to use, keeping you focused on your code, not on wrestling with version control.

pre-commit

pre-commit

pre-commit checks your code for errors before you commit it. pre-commit is configurable.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana