Aura vs .NET Core

Overview

Aura

Stacks53

Followers56

Votes1

GitHub Stars2.9K

Forks255

.NET Core

Stacks7.0K

Followers2.6K

Votes155

GitHub Stars21.7K

Forks4.9K

Aura vs .NET Core: What are the differences?

Aura: Modern tools for modern applications. The Aura project centers around a collection of high-quality, well-tested, semantically versioned, standards-compliant, independent library packages that can be used in any codebase; .NET Core: An Open Source, General-Purpose Development Platform Maintained by Microsoft and the .NET Community. Cross-platform (supporting Windows, macOS, and Linux) and can be used to build device, cloud, and IoT applications.

Aura and .NET Core can be primarily classified as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.

Aura and .NET Core are both open source tools. .NET Core with 11.2K GitHub stars and 2.41K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Aura with 2.99K GitHub stars and 269 GitHub forks.

According to the StackShare community, .NET Core has a broader approval, being mentioned in 54 company stacks & 71 developers stacks; compared to Aura, which is listed in 9 company stacks and 4 developer stacks.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

VitePress Frameworks

VitePress

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

2

Advice on Aura, .NET Core

Anonymous

Dec 16, 2019

Review

There has been a lot of buzz around having PostgreSQL for ASP.NET Core 3.1 web apps. But Configuring Identity Server 4 with PostgreSQL is a real challenge. I've made a simple video to configure the ASP.NET Core 3.1 based Web application that uses AngualrJS as front end with Single Page App capabilities with Identity Server 4 talking to the PostgreSQL database. Check out this Video tutorial on how to do that in detail http://bit.ly/2EkotL5 You can access the entire code here on github http://bit.ly/35okpFj

210k views210k

Comments

Jakub

Jan 2, 2020

Decided

I was researching multiple high performance, concurent//parallel languages for the needs of authentication and authorization server, to be built on microservice architecture and Linux OS. Node.js with its asynchronous behavior and event loop suits the case best. Python Django & Flash turns to be slower and .NET Core & Framework wasn't the best choice for the Linux environment at the time (summer 2018).

I also tested Go lang and Rust, although they didn't meet the quick prototyping criteria as both languages are young and lacking libraries or battle-tested ORM.

377k views377k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Aura	.NET Core
The Aura project centers around a collection of high-quality, well-tested, semantically versioned, standards-compliant, independent library packages that can be used in any codebase.	Cross-platform (supporting Windows, macOS, and Linux) and can be used to build device, cloud, and IoT applications.
-	Cross-platform; Consistent across architectures; Command-line tools; Flexible deployment; Compatible with .NET Framework, Xamarin and Mono, via .NET Standard; Open source; Supported by Microsoft
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.9K	GitHub Stars 21.7K
GitHub Forks 255	GitHub Forks 4.9K
Stacks 53	Stacks 7.0K
Followers 56	Followers 2.6K
Votes 1	Votes 155
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Open source	Pros 30 Perfect to do any backend ( and a fast frontend) stuff 27 Fast 26 Cross-platform 25 Great performance 18 It promotes better codebase architectures and organizat
Integrations
PHP	Linux C# Visual Studio Code Sublime Text .NET Visual Studio ASP.NET Vim Visual Basic F#

What are some alternatives to Aura, .NET Core?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.