StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data Tools
  5. AWS Glue vs Azure Synapse

AWS Glue vs Azure Synapse

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS Glue
AWS Glue
Stacks461
Followers819
Votes9
Azure Synapse
Azure Synapse
Stacks104
Followers230
Votes10

AWS Glue vs Azure Synapse: What are the differences?

  1. Scalability: AWS Glue is highly scalable and can handle large amounts of data, allowing you to process and transform data at any scale. Azure Synapse, on the other hand, provides limitless scalability and can handle massive data volumes and complex workloads, making it suitable for enterprise-level data processing.

  2. Integration capabilities: AWS Glue provides seamless integration with other AWS services, allowing you to easily interact with various AWS components and services for data storage, analytics, and machine learning. Azure Synapse integrates well with the Microsoft ecosystem, providing a comprehensive platform for data integration, analytics, and AI capabilities through tight integration with Azure services and tools.

  3. Data warehousing capabilities: AWS Glue primarily focuses on data cataloging, metadata management, and data integration for analytics and machine learning workloads. Azure Synapse, on the other hand, is a complete analytics and data warehousing platform that combines big data analytics, data warehousing, and data integration capabilities in a unified environment.

  4. Serverless architecture: AWS Glue is a fully managed, serverless data integration service, which means you don't have to provision or manage any infrastructure. Azure Synapse also provides a serverless querying capability called "on-demand workspace," which allows you to query data instantly without the need for pre-provisioned resources. However, it also offers provisioned resource options for more predictable workloads.

  5. Pricing model: AWS Glue offers a pricing model based on the number of data processing units (DPU) and the duration of job executions, allowing you to control costs based on your specific requirements. Azure Synapse provides a consumption-based pricing model that allows you to pay for the resources you use, providing cost flexibility based on the scale and complexity of your data processing workloads.

  6. Ecosystem and community support: AWS Glue benefits from a mature and extensive AWS ecosystem, providing a wide range of services, tools, and resources for data analytics and machine learning. Azure Synapse leverages the Azure ecosystem, which also offers a comprehensive set of services, tools, and community support for data integration, analytics, and AI.

In Summary, AWS Glue and Azure Synapse have different strengths and capabilities. AWS Glue focuses more on data integration and metadata management, while Azure Synapse provides a unified platform with extensive data warehousing and analytics capabilities. Both platforms offer scalability, integration capabilities, serverless architecture, and flexible pricing models, but their ecosystems and community support may vary based on your existing cloud provider preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on AWS Glue, Azure Synapse

Vamshi
Vamshi

Data Engineer at Tata Consultancy Services

May 29, 2020

Needs adviceonPySparkPySparkAzure Data FactoryAzure Data FactoryDatabricksDatabricks

I have to collect different data from multiple sources and store them in a single cloud location. Then perform cleaning and transforming using PySpark, and push the end results to other applications like reporting tools, etc. What would be the best solution? I can only think of Azure Data Factory + Databricks. Are there any alternatives to #AWS services + Databricks?

269k views269k
Comments
datocrats-org
datocrats-org

Jul 29, 2020

Needs adviceonAmazon EC2Amazon EC2TableauTableauPowerBIPowerBI

We need to perform ETL from several databases into a data warehouse or data lake. We want to

  • keep raw and transformed data available to users to draft their own queries efficiently
  • give users the ability to give custom permissions and SSO
  • move between open-source on-premises development and cloud-based production environments

We want to use inexpensive Amazon EC2 instances only on medium-sized data set 16GB to 32GB feeding into Tableau Server or PowerBI for reporting and data analysis purposes.

319k views319k
Comments
Pavithra
Pavithra

Mar 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAmazon S3Amazon S3Amazon AthenaAmazon AthenaAmazon RedshiftAmazon Redshift

Hi all,

Currently, we need to ingest the data from Amazon S3 to DB either Amazon Athena or Amazon Redshift. But the problem with the data is, it is in .PSV (pipe separated values) format and the size is also above 200 GB. The query performance of the timeout in Athena/Redshift is not up to the mark, too slow while compared to Google BigQuery. How would I optimize the performance and query result time? Can anyone please help me out?

522k views522k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

AWS Glue
AWS Glue
Azure Synapse
Azure Synapse

A fully managed extract, transform, and load (ETL) service that makes it easy for customers to prepare and load their data for analytics.

It is an analytics service that brings together enterprise data warehousing and Big Data analytics. It gives you the freedom to query data on your terms, using either serverless on-demand or provisioned resources—at scale. It brings these two worlds together with a unified experience to ingest, prepare, manage, and serve data for immediate BI and machine learning needs.

Easy - AWS Glue automates much of the effort in building, maintaining, and running ETL jobs. AWS Glue crawls your data sources, identifies data formats, and suggests schemas and transformations. AWS Glue automatically generates the code to execute your data transformations and loading processes.; Integrated - AWS Glue is integrated across a wide range of AWS services.; Serverless - AWS Glue is serverless. There is no infrastructure to provision or manage. AWS Glue handles provisioning, configuration, and scaling of the resources required to run your ETL jobs on a fully managed, scale-out Apache Spark environment. You pay only for the resources used while your jobs are running.; Developer Friendly - AWS Glue generates ETL code that is customizable, reusable, and portable, using familiar technology - Scala, Python, and Apache Spark. You can also import custom readers, writers and transformations into your Glue ETL code. Since the code AWS Glue generates is based on open frameworks, there is no lock-in. You can use it anywhere.
Complete T-SQL based analytics – Generally Available; Deeply integrated Apache Spark; Hybrid data integration; Unified user experience
Statistics
Stacks
461
Stacks
104
Followers
819
Followers
230
Votes
9
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Managed Hive Metastore
Pros
  • 4
    ETL
  • 3
    Security
  • 2
    Serverless
  • 1
    Doesn't support cross database query
Cons
  • 1
    Concurrency
  • 1
    Dictionary Size Limitation - CCI
Integrations
Amazon Redshift
Amazon Redshift
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Amazon RDS
Amazon RDS
Amazon Athena
Amazon Athena
MySQL
MySQL
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
Amazon EMR
Amazon EMR
Amazon Aurora
Amazon Aurora
Oracle
Oracle
Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to AWS Glue, Azure Synapse?

Metabase

Metabase

It is an easy way to generate charts and dashboards, ask simple ad hoc queries without using SQL, and see detailed information about rows in your Database. You can set it up in under 5 minutes, and then give yourself and others a place to ask simple questions and understand the data your application is generating.

Google BigQuery

Google BigQuery

Run super-fast, SQL-like queries against terabytes of data in seconds, using the processing power of Google's infrastructure. Load data with ease. Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in. Easy access. Access BigQuery by using a browser tool, a command-line tool, or by making calls to the BigQuery REST API with client libraries such as Java, PHP or Python.

Apache Spark

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

Amazon Redshift

Amazon Redshift

It is optimized for data sets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions.

Qubole

Qubole

Qubole is a cloud based service that makes big data easy for analysts and data engineers.

Presto

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Amazon EMR

Amazon EMR

It is used in a variety of applications, including log analysis, data warehousing, machine learning, financial analysis, scientific simulation, and bioinformatics.

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to manage, and you pay only for the queries that you run.

Superset

Superset

Superset's main goal is to make it easy to slice, dice and visualize data. It empowers users to perform analytics at the speed of thought.

Apache Flink

Apache Flink

Apache Flink is an open source system for fast and versatile data analytics in clusters. Flink supports batch and streaming analytics, in one system. Analytical programs can be written in concise and elegant APIs in Java and Scala.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase