StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Azure Repos vs TortoiseSVN

Azure Repos vs TortoiseSVN

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TortoiseSVN
TortoiseSVN
Stacks54
Followers117
Votes3
GitHub Stars43
Forks30
Azure Repos
Azure Repos
Stacks64
Followers92
Votes0

Azure Repos vs TortoiseSVN: What are the differences?

Introduction

Azure Repos and TortoiseSVN are both version control systems that are used to manage and track changes in software development projects. However, there are several key differences between these two tools.

  1. Integration with Azure DevOps: Azure Repos is a part of Azure DevOps, which is a comprehensive set of development tools provided by Microsoft. This integration allows for seamless collaboration and integration with other Azure services such as Azure Boards and Azure Pipelines. TortoiseSVN, on the other hand, is a standalone Subversion (SVN) client that does not have the same level of integration with other development tools.

  2. Centralized vs. Distributed: Azure Repos is a centralized version control system, meaning that there is a central repository that stores all versions of the code. This allows for better control and management of the codebase, as well as easier collaboration among team members. TortoiseSVN, on the other hand, is a distributed version control system, where each individual user has their own copy of the entire code repository. This allows for greater flexibility and autonomy for individual team members.

  3. Authentication and Access Control: Azure Repos provides robust authentication and access control mechanisms through Azure Active Directory. This allows for fine-grained control over who can access and make changes to the repository. TortoiseSVN, on the other hand, relies on the authentication mechanisms provided by the Subversion server it is connected to, which may not be as comprehensive or integrated as Azure Active Directory.

  4. Branching and Merging: Azure Repos provides powerful branching and merging capabilities, allowing for parallel development and easy integration of changes from multiple branches. TortoiseSVN also supports branching and merging, but it may not have the same level of sophistication and ease of use as Azure Repos.

  5. Built-in Continuous Integration and Deployment: Azure Repos integrates seamlessly with Azure Pipelines, allowing for automated build, testing, and deployment of code changes. This can significantly simplify the development and release process. TortoiseSVN does not have built-in support for continuous integration and deployment and would require additional tools and configuration to achieve similar capabilities.

  6. Visual Studio Integration: Azure Repos has deep integration with Visual Studio, which is a popular integrated development environment (IDE) provided by Microsoft. This allows for seamless integration of source control operations within the Visual Studio environment. TortoiseSVN, on the other hand, does not have the same level of integration with Visual Studio and may require additional plugins or configuration for seamless integration.

In summary, Azure Repos offers tighter integration with Azure DevOps, centralized version control, robust authentication and access control, powerful branching and merging capabilities, built-in continuous integration and deployment, and deep integration with Visual Studio. TortoiseSVN, on the other hand, is a standalone Subversion client that provides distributed version control and may require additional tools and configuration for similar capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TortoiseSVN
TortoiseSVN
Azure Repos
Azure Repos

It is an Apache™ Subversion (SVN)® client, implemented as a Windows shell extension. It's intuitive and easy to use, since it doesn't require the Subversion command line client to run. And it is free to use, even in a commercial environment.

It is a set of version control tools that you can use to manage your code. Get unlimited private Git repository hosting and support across all scales, from a single hobby project for TFVC to the world's largest repository.

Easy to use. all commands are available directly from the Windows Explorer;Powerful commit dialog. integrated spell checker for log messages;Per project settings;Integration with issue tracking systems; Helpful Tools;Available in many languages
Free private Git repositories, pull requests and code search; Support for all Git clients; Web hooks and API integration; Semantic code search
Statistics
GitHub Stars
43
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
30
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
54
Stacks
64
Followers
117
Followers
92
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to use
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Windows
Windows
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Azure Pipelines
Azure Pipelines
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to TortoiseSVN, Azure Repos?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana