StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Azure Service Bus vs NServiceBus

Azure Service Bus vs NServiceBus

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NServiceBus
NServiceBus
Stacks76
Followers132
Votes2
Azure Service Bus
Azure Service Bus
Stacks553
Followers536
Votes7

Azure Service Bus vs NServiceBus: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Azure Service Bus and NServiceBus. Both of these technologies are messaging systems used for communication and coordination between different components in a distributed system. However, there are several important differences between them that need to be considered when choosing the right solution for your specific requirements.

  1. Architecture:

Azure Service Bus is a fully managed cloud-based messaging service provided by Microsoft Azure. It offers various messaging patterns such as publish/subscribe and message queuing. It is designed to scale seamlessly and provides high availability and reliability. On the other hand, NServiceBus is a messaging framework built on top of .NET. It provides a higher-level abstraction for building distributed systems and enables developers to easily implement messaging patterns. NServiceBus can be used with different messaging transports, including Azure Service Bus.

  1. Flexibility and Customization:

Azure Service Bus provides a set of predefined messaging features and patterns, which can be used out of the box. It offers a reliable message queuing system with support for transactional message processing. However, it has limited options for customization and extensibility. On the other hand, NServiceBus provides a highly customizable and extensible framework. It allows developers to define their own messaging patterns, handle message serialization, implement custom transports, and integrate with other systems. This flexibility makes NServiceBus a better choice for complex and custom messaging scenarios.

  1. Integration and Ecosystem:

Azure Service Bus is tightly integrated with other Azure services and provides seamless integration with different Azure components such as Azure Functions, Azure Logic Apps, and Azure Event Grid. It also has built-in support for handling large message payloads and supports various protocols such as AMQP and MQTT. NServiceBus, on the other hand, does not have the same level of integration with Azure services. However, it has a rich ecosystem of extensions and plugins that provide additional functionality such as message encryption, retries, sagas, and monitoring.

  1. Development and Deployment:

Azure Service Bus is a fully managed service provided by Microsoft Azure, which means that you do not need to worry about setting up and maintaining the underlying infrastructure. It can be easily provisioned and scaled from the Azure portal or using automation scripts. NServiceBus, on the other hand, requires more effort in terms of setup and configuration. It needs to be deployed on your own infrastructure or on a cloud provider such as Azure. This gives you more control over the deployment and allows you to fine-tune the performance and scalability of the messaging system.

  1. Pricing and Cost:

Azure Service Bus has a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you are billed based on the number of messages sent/received and the amount of data transferred. It provides different pricing tiers to choose from based on your usage requirements. NServiceBus, on the other hand, is an open-source framework and does not have any direct costs associated with it. However, you still need to consider the cost of infrastructure, maintenance, and support when using NServiceBus in production.

  1. Community and Support:

Azure Service Bus is backed by Microsoft and has a large user community. It has extensive documentation, tutorials, and support resources available online. Microsoft provides technical support for Azure Service Bus subscribers based on the support plan chosen. NServiceBus, being an open-source framework, also has an active community of developers who contribute to its development and provide support through forums and community channels. However, the level of support may vary depending on the specific issue and availability of resources.

In Summary, Azure Service Bus and NServiceBus both provide messaging capabilities for building distributed systems, but Azure Service Bus is a fully managed cloud-based service offered by Microsoft Azure, while NServiceBus is a messaging framework built on top of .NET. The choice between the two depends on factors like architecture, flexibility, integration, development, pricing, and support requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NServiceBus, Azure Service Bus

André
André

Technology Manager at GS1 Portugal - Codipor

Jul 30, 2020

Needs adviceon.NET Core.NET Core

Hello dear developers, our company is starting a new project for a new Web App, and we are currently designing the Architecture (we will be using .NET Core). We want to embark on something new, so we are thinking about migrating from a monolithic perspective to a microservices perspective. We wish to containerize those microservices and make them independent from each other. Is it the best way for microservices to communicate with each other via ESB, or is there a new way of doing this? Maybe complementing with an API Gateway? Can you recommend something else different than the two tools I provided?

We want something good for Cost/Benefit; performance should be high too (but not the primary constraint).

Thank you very much in advance :)

461k views461k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NServiceBus
NServiceBus
Azure Service Bus
Azure Service Bus

Performance, scalability, pub/sub, reliable integration, workflow orchestration, and everything else you could possibly want in a service bus.

It is a cloud messaging system for connecting apps and devices across public and private clouds. You can depend on it when you need highly-reliable cloud messaging service between applications and services, even when one or more is offline.

Statistics
Stacks
76
Stacks
553
Followers
132
Followers
536
Votes
2
Votes
7
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Brings on-prem issues to the cloud
  • 1
    Not as good as alternatives, good job security
Pros
  • 4
    Easy Integration with .Net
  • 2
    Cloud Native
  • 1
    Use while high messaging need
Cons
  • 1
    Lacking in JMS support
  • 1
    Skills can only be used in Azure - vendor lock-in
  • 1
    Limited features in Basic tier
  • 1
    Observability of messages in the queue is lacking

What are some alternatives to NServiceBus, Azure Service Bus?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Gearman

Gearman

Gearman allows you to do work in parallel, to load balance processing, and to call functions between languages. It can be used in a variety of applications, from high-availability web sites to the transport of database replication events.

Memphis

Memphis

Highly scalable and effortless data streaming platform. Made to enable developers and data teams to collaborate and build real-time and streaming apps fast.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase