StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. Azure Storage vs iCloud

Azure Storage vs iCloud

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Storage
Azure Storage
Stacks1.3K
Followers787
Votes52
iCloud
iCloud
Stacks92
Followers83
Votes0

Azure Storage vs iCloud: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will be discussing the key differences between Azure Storage and iCloud. Both Azure Storage and iCloud are cloud storage platforms offered by Microsoft and Apple respectively, but they have different features and functionality that cater to the needs of different users. Let's dive into the details and explore their differences.

  1. Scalability and Performance: Azure Storage is designed to offer high scalability and performance. It can handle large amounts of data and offers various features like auto-scaling, load balancing, and caching to ensure high performance and low latency. On the other hand, iCloud is primarily aimed at individual users and has relatively limited scalability and performance compared to Azure Storage. It offers syncing and backup features for Apple devices but may not be suitable for heavy-duty storage needs.

  2. Supported Platforms: Azure Storage is a platform-agnostic solution and supports various programming languages and platforms including Windows, Linux, macOS, iOS, and Android. It provides SDKs and APIs for easy integration with different systems. In contrast, iCloud is limited to Apple's ecosystem and is primarily designed for use with Apple devices like iPhones, iPads, and Macs. It offers seamless integration with Apple's software and hardware, but may not be suitable for cross-platform development.

  3. Data Redundancy and Durability: Azure Storage offers high data redundancy and durability through features like geo-replication and multiple copies of data within a storage account. This ensures that data remains available even in case of hardware failures or disasters. iCloud also provides data redundancy and durability, but the level of redundancy and durability may not be as high as Azure Storage. It primarily relies on Apple's infrastructure and data centers for data protection.

  4. Storage Options: Azure Storage offers a wide range of storage options including blob storage, file storage, table storage, and queue storage. This allows users to choose the storage type that best suits their needs. On the other hand, iCloud primarily provides file-based storage and synchronization across Apple devices. It is primarily focused on document storage and syncing, rather than offering a variety of storage options.

  5. Integration with Other Services: Azure Storage seamlessly integrates with other Azure services such as virtual machines, databases, and analytics services. It offers integrations with Azure Functions for serverless computing and Azure Active Directory for authentication and authorization. In contrast, iCloud is tightly integrated with Apple's software ecosystem, offering features like device backup, iCloud Drive, and syncing across Apple devices. However, it has limited integration options with third-party services and platforms.

  6. Pricing: Azure Storage offers flexible pricing options based on usage and storage requirements. Users can choose from different tiers and pricing models to optimize costs. In contrast, iCloud offers fixed pricing plans based on storage capacities, with different plans available for individual users and families. The pricing structure may vary depending on the storage needs of the users.

In Summary, Azure Storage and iCloud differ in terms of scalability and performance, supported platforms, data redundancy and durability, storage options, integration with other services, and pricing models. These differences make them suitable for different use cases and target audiences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure Storage
Azure Storage
iCloud
iCloud

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Sign in to iCloud to access your photos, videos, documents, notes, contacts, and more. Use your Apple ID or create a new account to start using Apple services.

Blobs, Tables, Queues, and Files;Highly scalable;Durable & highly available;Premium Storage;Designed for developers
-
Statistics
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
92
Followers
787
Followers
83
Votes
52
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 24
    All-in-one storage solution
  • 15
    Pay only for data used regardless of disk size
  • 9
    Shared drive mapping
  • 2
    Cost-effective
  • 2
    Cheapest hot and cloud storage
Cons
  • 2
    Direct support is not provided by Azure storage
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Azure Storage, iCloud?

Google Drive

Google Drive

Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer.

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Dropbox

Dropbox

Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more.

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Box

Box

The Box API gives you access to the content management features you see in our web app and lets you extend them for use in your own app. It strives to be RESTful and is organized around the main resources you’re familiar with from the Box web interface.

Minio

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase