StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data Tools
  5. Apache Impala vs Azure Synapse

Apache Impala vs Azure Synapse

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Impala
Apache Impala
Stacks145
Followers301
Votes18
GitHub Stars34
Forks33
Azure Synapse
Azure Synapse
Stacks104
Followers230
Votes10

Apache Impala vs Azure Synapse: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Impala and Azure Synapse are two popular data analytics tools that provide fast and efficient querying capabilities for large datasets. However, they have key differences that set them apart in terms of performance, scalability, and integration capabilities.

  1. Architecture: Apache Impala uses a MPP (massively parallel processing) architecture that enables it to handle complex queries on massive datasets in real-time. In comparison, Azure Synapse leverages a distributed data processing model that combines on-demand and provisioned resources for query execution and processing.

  2. Ecosystem Integration: Apache Impala is tightly integrated with the Hadoop ecosystem, which allows it to seamlessly query data stored in HDFS, HBase, and other Hadoop components. On the other hand, Azure Synapse offers deep integration with Microsoft's cloud services, enabling seamless connectivity with Azure Data Lake Storage, Azure SQL Data Warehouse, and other Azure data services.

  3. Scalability: Apache Impala is known for its horizontal scalability, allowing users to add more nodes to increase query performance and processing power. In contrast, Azure Synapse offers auto-scaling capabilities that automatically adjust resources based on workload demands, providing a more dynamic and flexible scaling solution.

  4. Data Storage: Apache Impala supports querying data in various file formats, including Parquet, Avro, and text files, stored in HDFS or cloud storage. In contrast, Azure Synapse is optimized for querying data stored in Azure Data Lake Storage and Azure SQL Data Warehouse, providing seamless access to data across different storage solutions.

  5. Security: Apache Impala offers robust security features such as Kerberos authentication, role-based access control, and SSL encryption to protect sensitive data and ensure compliance with security standards. Azure Synapse provides built-in security capabilities, including Azure Active Directory integration, data encryption at rest and in transit, and fine-grained access control for securing data assets.

In Summary, Apache Impala and Azure Synapse differ in terms of architecture, ecosystem integration, scalability, data storage options, and security features, providing users with distinct capabilities for processing and querying large datasets efficiently.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Impala
Apache Impala
Azure Synapse
Azure Synapse

Impala is a modern, open source, MPP SQL query engine for Apache Hadoop. Impala is shipped by Cloudera, MapR, and Amazon. With Impala, you can query data, whether stored in HDFS or Apache HBase – including SELECT, JOIN, and aggregate functions – in real time.

It is an analytics service that brings together enterprise data warehousing and Big Data analytics. It gives you the freedom to query data on your terms, using either serverless on-demand or provisioned resources—at scale. It brings these two worlds together with a unified experience to ingest, prepare, manage, and serve data for immediate BI and machine learning needs.

Do BI-style Queries on Hadoop;Unify Your Infrastructure;Implement Quickly;Count on Enterprise-class Security;Retain Freedom from Lock-in;Expand the Hadoop User-verse
Complete T-SQL based analytics – Generally Available; Deeply integrated Apache Spark; Hybrid data integration; Unified user experience
Statistics
GitHub Stars
34
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
33
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
145
Stacks
104
Followers
301
Followers
230
Votes
18
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 11
    Super fast
  • 1
    High Performance
  • 1
    Distributed
  • 1
    Replication
  • 1
    Load Balancing
Pros
  • 4
    ETL
  • 3
    Security
  • 2
    Serverless
  • 1
    Doesn't support cross database query
Cons
  • 1
    Concurrency
  • 1
    Dictionary Size Limitation - CCI
Integrations
Hadoop
Hadoop
Mode
Mode
Redash
Redash
Apache Kudu
Apache Kudu
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Apache Impala, Azure Synapse?

Metabase

Metabase

It is an easy way to generate charts and dashboards, ask simple ad hoc queries without using SQL, and see detailed information about rows in your Database. You can set it up in under 5 minutes, and then give yourself and others a place to ask simple questions and understand the data your application is generating.

Google BigQuery

Google BigQuery

Run super-fast, SQL-like queries against terabytes of data in seconds, using the processing power of Google's infrastructure. Load data with ease. Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in. Easy access. Access BigQuery by using a browser tool, a command-line tool, or by making calls to the BigQuery REST API with client libraries such as Java, PHP or Python.

Apache Spark

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

Amazon Redshift

Amazon Redshift

It is optimized for data sets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions.

Qubole

Qubole

Qubole is a cloud based service that makes big data easy for analysts and data engineers.

Presto

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Amazon EMR

Amazon EMR

It is used in a variety of applications, including log analysis, data warehousing, machine learning, financial analysis, scientific simulation, and bioinformatics.

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to manage, and you pay only for the queries that you run.

Superset

Superset

Superset's main goal is to make it easy to slice, dice and visualize data. It empowers users to perform analytics at the speed of thought.

Apache Flink

Apache Flink

Apache Flink is an open source system for fast and versatile data analytics in clusters. Flink supports batch and streaming analytics, in one system. Analytical programs can be written in concise and elegant APIs in Java and Scala.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase