StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage vs Storj

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage vs Storj

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
Stacks58
Followers34
Votes1
Storj
Storj
Stacks23
Followers41
Votes23
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage vs Storj: What are the differences?

Introduction

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage and Storj are both popular cloud storage solutions that offer similar services and cater to the needs of different users. However, there are several key differences between the two platforms that set them apart.

1. Pricing Model:

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage follows a straightforward pricing model, where users pay per gigabyte of data stored and per gigabyte downloaded. On the other hand, Storj utilizes a decentralized network of storage providers, allowing users to pay for the resources they consume without any fixed pricing structure. This enables users to potentially save costs by leveraging excess storage capacity offered by individual providers.

2. Storage Infrastructure:

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage operates its own data centers and storage infrastructure, ensuring reliable and highly available service. In contrast, Storj uses a decentralized network leveraging the spare storage resources of its network of storage node operators. This approach offers increased scalability and fault tolerance by distributing data across multiple nodes, but may also introduce variability in performance and availability.

3. Data Security and Privacy:

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage adheres to robust security practices, including data encryption at rest and in transit, as well as access controls and user authentication mechanisms. Additionally, Backblaze is SOC and HIPAA compliant, providing assurance for handling sensitive data. While Storj also offers strong encryption mechanisms, its decentralized nature may raise concerns about the overall security and privacy of the data stored, as it relies on independent storage node operators.

4. API and Integration:

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage provides a well-documented RESTful API, allowing developers to easily integrate their applications with the platform. It also offers dedicated software development kits (SDKs) for numerous programming languages. Storj offers a similar API and SDKs, but its decentralized nature may introduce additional complexity when building applications that interact with the network of storage nodes.

5. Data Transfer Speed:

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage offers strong and consistent data transfer speeds, as it operates its own high-speed data centers. Storj, being decentralized, relies on the network capabilities and performance of individual storage node operators. This might result in varying transfer speeds depending on the specific location and network capabilities of each storage node.

6. Support and Documentation:

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage provides comprehensive documentation and offers support through various channels, including email and phone. Additionally, Backblaze offers service-level agreements (SLAs) with specified response and resolution times. While Storj also provides documentation and support, its decentralized network may introduce challenges in terms of centralized support and standardized SLAs.

In summary, Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage distinguishes itself through its straightforward pricing model, centralized infrastructure, and robust security measures, while Storj sets itself apart by leveraging a decentralized network, potentially offering cost savings and increased scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage, Storj

Ben
Ben

May 18, 2020

Decided

We choose Backblaze B2 because it makes more sense for storing static assets.

We admire Backblaze's customer service & transparency, plus, we trust them to maintain fair business practices - including not raising prices in the future.

Lower storage costs means we can keep more data for longer, and lower bandwidth means cache misses don't cost a ton.

120k views120k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
Storj
Storj

It is a generic cloud storage. You can use it from any computer, any operating system or any cloud storage purpose. You can manage and store large amounts of media files using this service

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

-
Performance; Security & Privacy; Durability; Open Source; Affordable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
58
Stacks
23
Followers
34
Followers
41
Votes
1
Votes
23
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Great API
Pros
  • 3
    Scalable
  • 3
    Decentralized
  • 2
    Durability
  • 2
    Resilient
  • 2
    Fast
Integrations
No integrations available
CloudFlare
CloudFlare
Amazon CloudWatch
Amazon CloudWatch
Cloud Firestore
Cloud Firestore
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Apache CloudStack
Apache CloudStack
Amazon CloudFront
Amazon CloudFront

What are some alternatives to Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage, Storj?

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Minio

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

RunAbove

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

Rook

Rook

It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase