Baget vs Homebrew

Overview

Homebrew

Stacks589

Followers515

Votes3

GitHub Stars45.3K

Forks10.6K

Baget

Stacks13

Followers7

Votes0

GitHub Stars2.7K

Forks755

Baget vs Homebrew: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here are the key differences between Baget and Homebrew.

Installation Process: Baget is a package manager for Windows that operates similarly to Linux package managers, whereas Homebrew is a package manager specifically designed for macOS. The installation process for Baget involves downloading an executable file and running it, while Homebrew requires the installation of Xcode command line tools before being installed through a command-line script.
Operating Systems: Baget is exclusively designed for Windows operating systems, providing a solution for package management on this platform. On the other hand, Homebrew is tailored for use on macOS systems, allowing users to easily manage and install software packages through the command line.
Package Availability: Baget primarily focuses on providing Windows users with a variety of open-source software packages that can be easily installed and managed. In contrast, Homebrew offers a wide range of packages specifically curated for macOS users, ensuring that they have access to essential tools and programs needed for development and daily tasks.
Community Support: Homebrew has a strong community of developers and contributors constantly working to improve and expand its package database, ensuring that users have access to the latest and most updated software packages. Baget, being a relatively newer package manager, is still growing its community and package offerings.
Command Line Usage: The usage of Baget involves running commands in the Command Prompt on Windows, providing a familiar environment for users comfortable with Windows operating systems. On the other hand, Homebrew utilizes the Terminal on macOS, offering a command-line interface that is commonly used by developers and power users on this platform.
Package Manager Ecosystem: Baget is part of the Windows package manager ecosystem, filling the gap for Windows users who require a package manager similar to those found on Linux systems. Homebrew, on the other hand, is unique to macOS and has a well-established presence within the macOS developer community.

In Summary, the key differences between Baget and Homebrew lie in their installation processes, target operating systems, package availability, community support, command line usage, and their positions within the respective package manager ecosystems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Homebrew	Baget
Homebrew installs the stuff you need that Apple didn’t. Homebrew installs packages to their own directory and then symlinks their files into /usr/local.	It is a lightweight NuGet and symbol server. It is open source, cross-platform, and cloud ready.
-	Cross-platform; Dockerized; Cloud ready; Supports read-through caching; Can index the entirety of nuget.org
Statistics
GitHub Stars 45.3K	GitHub Stars 2.7K
GitHub Forks 10.6K	GitHub Forks 755
Stacks 589	Stacks 13
Followers 515	Followers 7
Votes 3	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Clean, neat, powerful, fast and furious	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Ruby cURL GNU Bash	Docker Aliyun

What are some alternatives to Homebrew, Baget?

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Elm

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

Julia

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Racket

It is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language based on the Scheme dialect of Lisp. It is designed to be a platform for programming language design and implementation. It is also used for scripting, computer science education, and research.

PureScript

A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.

Composer

It is a tool for dependency management in PHP. It allows you to declare the libraries your project depends on and it will manage (install/update) them for you.

pnpm

It uses hard links and symlinks to save one version of a module only ever once on a disk. When using npm or Yarn for example, if you have 100 projects using the same version of lodash, you will have 100 copies of lodash on disk. With pnpm, lodash will be saved in a single place on the disk and a hard link will put it into the node_modules where it should be installed.

Bun

Develop, test, run, and bundle JavaScript & TypeScript projects—all with Bun. Bun is an all-in-one JavaScript runtime & toolkit designed for speed, complete with a bundler, test runner, and Node.js-compatible package manager.

fpm

It helps you build packages quickly and easily (Packages like RPM and DEB formats).

Related Comparisons

Baget vs Homebrew: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here are the key differences between Baget and Homebrew.

Installation Process: Baget is a package manager for Windows that operates similarly to Linux package managers, whereas Homebrew is a package manager specifically designed for macOS. The installation process for Baget involves downloading an executable file and running it, while Homebrew requires the installation of Xcode command line tools before being installed through a command-line script.
Operating Systems: Baget is exclusively designed for Windows operating systems, providing a solution for package management on this platform. On the other hand, Homebrew is tailored for use on macOS systems, allowing users to easily manage and install software packages through the command line.
Package Availability: Baget primarily focuses on providing Windows users with a variety of open-source software packages that can be easily installed and managed. In contrast, Homebrew offers a wide range of packages specifically curated for macOS users, ensuring that they have access to essential tools and programs needed for development and daily tasks.
Community Support: Homebrew has a strong community of developers and contributors constantly working to improve and expand its package database, ensuring that users have access to the latest and most updated software packages. Baget, being a relatively newer package manager, is still growing its community and package offerings.
Command Line Usage: The usage of Baget involves running commands in the Command Prompt on Windows, providing a familiar environment for users comfortable with Windows operating systems. On the other hand, Homebrew utilizes the Terminal on macOS, offering a command-line interface that is commonly used by developers and power users on this platform.
Package Manager Ecosystem: Baget is part of the Windows package manager ecosystem, filling the gap for Windows users who require a package manager similar to those found on Linux systems. Homebrew, on the other hand, is unique to macOS and has a well-established presence within the macOS developer community.

Baget vs Homebrew

Overview

Baget vs Homebrew: What are the differences?