Alternatives to Beego logo

Alternatives to Beego

Revel, Iris, Echo, Django, and Buffalo are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Beego.
38
63
+ 1
0

What is Beego and what are its top alternatives?

It is a RESTful HTTP framework for the rapid development of Go applications including APIs, web apps and backend services with integrated Go specific features such as interfaces and struct embedding.
Beego is a tool in the Frameworks (Full Stack) category of a tech stack.
Beego is an open source tool with 180 GitHub stars and 50 GitHub forks. Here鈥檚 a link to Beego's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Beego

  • Revel

    Revel

    Revel makes it easy to build web applications using the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern by relying on conventions that require a certain structure in your application. In return, it is very light on configuration and enables an extremely fast development cycle. ...

  • Iris

    Iris

    The fastest web framework for Go.

  • Echo

    Echo

    It is a high performance, extensible, minimalist web framework for Go (Golang). ...

  • Django

    Django

    Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design. ...

  • Buffalo

    Buffalo

    Buffalo is Go web framework. Yeah, I hate the word "framework" too! Buffalo is different though. Buffalo doesn't want to re-invent wheels like routing and templating. Buffalo is glue that wraps all of the best packages available and makes them all play nicely together. ...

  • Laravel

    Laravel

    It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching. ...

  • Node.js

    Node.js

    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices. ...

  • ASP.NET

    ASP.NET

    .NET is a developer platform made up of tools, programming languages, and libraries for building many different types of applications. ...

Beego alternatives & related posts

Revel logo

Revel

33
82
36
A high productivity, full-stack web framework for the Go language
33
82
+ 1
36
PROS OF REVEL
  • 15
    Go
  • 6
    High-Productivity
  • 5
    Full-Stack
  • 4
    High performance
  • 4
    MVC
  • 2
    Open source
  • 0
    Simple
CONS OF REVEL
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Revel posts

    Iris logo

    Iris

    62
    94
    16
    The fastest web framework for Go in (THIS) earth
    62
    94
    + 1
    16
    PROS OF IRIS
    • 6
      Fast
    • 4
      Easy to use
    • 3
      Almost real-time support to its users
    • 2
      Fluent API
    • 1
      MVC efficient
    CONS OF IRIS
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Iris posts

      Echo logo

      Echo

      163
      144
      53
      High performance, extensible, minimalist Go web framework
      163
      144
      + 1
      53
      PROS OF ECHO
      • 9
        Easy to use
      • 9
        Highly customizable
      • 9
        Performance
      • 8
        Lightweight
      • 8
        Open source
      • 7
        Middleware
      • 3
        Minimal
      CONS OF ECHO
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Echo posts

        Django logo

        Django

        23.9K
        20.7K
        3.6K
        The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
        23.9K
        20.7K
        + 1
        3.6K
        PROS OF DJANGO
        • 618
          Rapid development
        • 459
          Open source
        • 394
          Great community
        • 344
          Easy to learn
        • 256
          Mvc
        • 208
          Beautiful code
        • 207
          Elegant
        • 187
          Free
        • 186
          Great packages
        • 173
          Great libraries
        • 63
          Restful
        • 60
          Powerful
        • 59
          Comes with auth and crud admin panel
        • 55
          Great documentation
        • 52
          Great for web
        • 41
          Python
        • 35
          Great orm
        • 31
          Great for api
        • 24
          All included
        • 20
          Web Apps
        • 19
          Fast
        • 16
          Used by top startups
        • 14
          Clean
        • 13
          Sexy
        • 12
          Easy setup
        • 10
          Convention over configuration
        • 7
          ORM
        • 7
          Allows for very rapid development with great libraries
        • 7
          The Django community
        • 5
          Its elegant and practical
        • 5
          Great MVC and templating engine
        • 4
          Full stack
        • 4
          Mvt
        • 4
          Easy Structure , useful inbuilt library
        • 4
          Fast prototyping
        • 4
          Easy to develop end to end AI Models
        • 3
          Easy
        • 3
          Easy to use
        • 3
          King of backend world
        • 3
          Cross-Platform
        • 3
          Batteries included
        • 3
          Have not found anything that it can't do
        • 2
          Scaffold
        • 2
          Zero code burden to change databases
        • 2
          Full-Text Search
        • 2
          Map
        • 2
          Modular
        • 2
          Very quick to get something up and running
        • 2
          Many libraries
        • 2
          Python community
        • 2
          Great peformance
        • 2
          Just the right level of abstraction
        • 1
          Easy to change database manager
        CONS OF DJANGO
        • 24
          Underpowered templating
        • 19
          Underpowered ORM
        • 18
          Autoreload restarts whole server
        • 15
          URL dispatcher ignores HTTP method
        • 10
          Internal subcomponents coupling
        • 7
          Not nodejs
        • 7
          Admin
        • 6
          Configuration hell
        • 3
          Not as clean and nice documentation like Laravel
        • 3
          Bloated admin panel included
        • 3
          Python
        • 2
          Overwhelming folder structure
        • 2
          Not typed
        • 1
          InEffective Multithreading

        related Django posts

        Dmitry Mukhin

        Simple controls over complex technologies, as we put it, wouldn't be possible without neat UIs for our user areas including start page, dashboard, settings, and docs.

        Initially, there was Django. Back in 2011, considering our Python-centric approach, that was the best choice. Later, we realized we needed to iterate on our website more quickly. And this led us to detaching Django from our front end. That was when we decided to build an SPA.

        For building user interfaces, we're currently using React as it provided the fastest rendering back when we were building our toolkit. It鈥檚 worth mentioning Uploadcare is not a front-end-focused SPA: we aren鈥檛 running at high levels of complexity. If it were, we鈥檇 go with Ember.js.

        However, there's a chance we will shift to the faster Preact, with its motto of using as little code as possible, and because it makes more use of browser APIs. One of our future tasks for our front end is to configure our Webpack bundler to split up the code for different site sections. For styles, we use PostCSS along with its plugins such as cssnano which minifies all the code.

        All that allows us to provide a great user experience and quickly implement changes where they are needed with as little code as possible.

        See more

        Hey, so I developed a basic application with Python. But to use it, you need a python interpreter. I want to add a GUI to make it more appealing. What should I choose to develop a GUI? I have very basic skills in front end development (CSS, JavaScript). I am fluent in python. I'm looking for a tool that is easy to use and doesn't require too much code knowledge. I have recently tried out Flask, but it is kinda complicated. Should I stick with it, move to Django, or is there another nice framework to use?

        See more
        Buffalo logo

        Buffalo

        11
        41
        5
        MVC Web Framework for Go
        11
        41
        + 1
        5
        PROS OF BUFFALO
        • 4
          Go
        • 1
          Friendly Api
        CONS OF BUFFALO
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Buffalo posts

          Laravel logo

          Laravel

          18.5K
          14.4K
          3.4K
          A PHP Framework For Web Artisans
          18.5K
          14.4K
          + 1
          3.4K
          PROS OF LARAVEL
          • 504
            Clean architecture
          • 364
            Growing community
          • 339
            Composer friendly
          • 315
            Open source
          • 295
            The only framework to consider for php
          • 194
            Mvc
          • 189
            Quickly develop
          • 155
            Dependency injection
          • 143
            Application architecture
          • 129
            Embraces good community packages
          • 57
            Write less, do more
          • 52
            Restful routing
          • 47
            Orm (eloquent)
          • 43
            Artisan scaffolding and migrations
          • 42
            Database migrations & seeds
          • 35
            Awesome
          • 33
            Great documentation
          • 25
            Awsome, Powerfull, Fast and Rapid
          • 25
            Promotes elegant coding
          • 24
            Build Apps faster, easier and better
          • 22
            Easy to learn, scalability
          • 22
            JSON friendly
          • 21
            Most easy for me
          • 21
            Eloquent ORM
          • 19
            Modern PHP
          • 19
            Test-Driven
          • 18
            Beautiful
          • 18
            Blade Template
          • 13
            Security
          • 11
            Based on SOLID
          • 11
            Clean Documentation
          • 10
            Cool
          • 10
            Easy to attach Middleware
          • 10
            Simple
          • 10
            Convention over Configuration
          • 9
            Easy Request Validatin
          • 8
            Simpler
          • 8
            Get going quickly straight out of the box. BYOKDM
          • 8
            Its just wow
          • 8
            Fast
          • 8
            Laravel + Cassandra = Killer Framework
          • 8
            Easy to use
          • 7
            Super easy and powerful
          • 7
            Friendly API
          • 7
            Less dependencies
          • 7
            Simplistic , easy and faster
          • 6
            Great customer support
          • 6
            Its beautiful to code in
          • 5
            Php7
          • 5
            Active Record
          • 5
            Fast and Clarify framework
          • 5
            Easy
          • 5
            The only "cons" is wrong! No static method just Facades
          • 5
            Speed
          • 4
            Eloquent
          • 4
            Easy views handling and great ORM
          • 4
            Minimum system requirements
          • 4
            Laravel Mix
          • 4
            Composer
          • 4
            Laragon
          • 3
            Laravel Nova
          • 3
            Laravel casher
          • 3
            Laravel Spark
          • 3
            Intuitive usage
          • 3
            Ease of use
          • 3
            Cashier with Braintree and Stripe
          • 3
            Laravel Forge and Envoy
          • 3
            Laravel Horizon and Telescope
          • 3
            Laravel Passport
          • 2
            Heart touch
          • 2
            Like heart beat
          • 2
            Touch heart artisan
          • 2
            Scout
          • 2
            Rapid development
          • 2
            Laravel love live long
          CONS OF LARAVEL
          • 40
            PHP
          • 27
            Too many dependency
          • 19
            Slower than the other two
          • 15
            A lot of static method calls for convenience
          • 13
            Too many include
          • 10
            Heavy
          • 7
            Bloated
          • 6
            Laravel
          • 5
            Confusing
          • 4
            Does not work well for file uploads in Shared Hosting
          • 3
            Too underrated
          • 2
            Not fast with MongoDB
          • 1
            Difficult to learn
          • 1
            Not using SOLID principles

          related Laravel posts

          Antonio Sanchez

          Back at the start of 2017, we decided to create a web-based tool for the SEO OnPage analysis of our clients' websites. We had over 2.000 websites to analyze, so we had to perform thousands of requests to get every single page from those websites, process the information and save the big amounts of data somewhere.

          Very soon we realized that the initial chosen script language and database, PHP, Laravel and MySQL, was not going to be able to cope efficiently with such a task.

          By that time, we were doing some experiments for other projects with a language we had recently get to know, Go , so we decided to get a try and code the crawler using it. It was fantastic, we could process much more data with way less CPU power and in less time. By using the concurrency abilites that the language has to offers, we could also do more Http requests in less time.

          Unfortunately, I have no comparison numbers to show about the performance differences between Go and PHP since the difference was so clear from the beginning and that we didn't feel the need to do further comparison tests nor document it. We just switched fully to Go.

          There was still a problem: despite the big amount of Data we were generating, MySQL was performing very well, but as we were adding more and more features to the software and with those features more and more different type of data to save, it was a nightmare for the database architects to structure everything correctly on the database, so it was clear what we had to do next: switch to a NoSQL database. So we switched to MongoDB, and it was also fantastic: we were expending almost zero time in thinking how to structure the Database and the performance also seemed to be better, but again, I have no comparison numbers to show due to the lack of time.

          We also decided to switch the website from PHP and Laravel to JavaScript and Node.js and ExpressJS since working with the JSON Data that we were saving now in the Database would be easier.

          As of now, we don't only use the tool intern but we also opened it for everyone to use for free: https://tool-seo.com

          See more
          CDG

          I use Laravel because it's the most advances PHP framework out there, easy to maintain, easy to upgrade and most of all : easy to get a handle on, and to follow every new technology ! PhpStorm is our main software to code, as of simplicity and full range of tools for a modern application.

          Google Analytics Analytics of course for a tailored analytics, Bulma as an innovative CSS framework, coupled with our Sass (Scss) pre-processor.

          As of more basic stuff, we use HTML5, JavaScript (but with Vue.js too) and Webpack to handle the generation of all this.

          To deploy, we set up Buddy to easily send the updates on our nginx / Ubuntu server, where it will connect to our GitHub Git private repository, pull and do all the operations needed with Deployer .

          CloudFlare ensure the rapidity of distribution of our content, and Let's Encrypt the https certificate that is more than necessary when we'll want to sell some products with our Stripe api calls.

          Asana is here to let us list all the functionalities, possibilities and ideas we want to implement.

          See more
          Node.js logo

          Node.js

          108.9K
          88.6K
          8.3K
          A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications
          108.9K
          88.6K
          + 1
          8.3K
          PROS OF NODE.JS
          • 1.4K
            Npm
          • 1.3K
            Javascript
          • 1.1K
            Great libraries
          • 1K
            High-performance
          • 791
            Open source
          • 480
            Great for apis
          • 471
            Asynchronous
          • 417
            Great community
          • 387
            Great for realtime apps
          • 292
            Great for command line utilities
          • 78
            Node Modules
          • 76
            Websockets
          • 65
            Uber Simple
          • 53
            Allows us to reuse code in the frontend
          • 53
            Great modularity
          • 38
            Easy to start
          • 33
            Great for Data Streaming
          • 29
            Realtime
          • 25
            Awesome
          • 23
            Non blocking IO
          • 16
            Can be used as a proxy
          • 15
            High performance, open source, scalable
          • 14
            Non-blocking and modular
          • 13
            Easy and Fun
          • 12
            Same lang as AngularJS
          • 11
            Easy and powerful
          • 10
            Future of BackEnd
          • 9
            Fast
          • 8
            Scalability
          • 8
            Cross platform
          • 8
            Fullstack
          • 7
            Mean Stack
          • 7
            Simple
          • 5
            Easy concurrency
          • 5
            Great for webapps
          • 5
            React
          • 4
            Friendly
          • 4
            Easy to use and fast and goes well with JSONdb's
          • 4
            Typescript
          • 4
            Fast, simple code and async
          • 3
            Its amazingly fast and scalable
          • 3
            Scalable
          • 3
            Great speed
          • 3
            Fast development
          • 3
            Isomorphic coolness
          • 3
            Control everything
          • 2
            It's fast
          • 2
            Not Python
          • 2
            Blazing fast
          • 2
            One language, end-to-end
          • 2
            TypeScript Support
          • 2
            Easy to learn
          • 2
            Javascript2
          • 2
            Easy to use
          • 2
            Less boilerplate code
          • 2
            Sooper easy for the Backend connectivity
          • 2
            Great community
          • 2
            Scales, fast, simple, great community, npm, express
          • 2
            Performant and fast prototyping
          • 1
            Easy
          • 1
            Lovely
          • 0
            Event Driven
          CONS OF NODE.JS
          • 46
            Bound to a single CPU
          • 40
            New framework every day
          • 34
            Lots of terrible examples on the internet
          • 28
            Asynchronous programming is the worst
          • 22
            Callback
          • 16
            Javascript
          • 11
            Dependency based on GitHub
          • 10
            Dependency hell
          • 10
            Low computational power
          • 7
            Can block whole server easily
          • 6
            Very very Slow
          • 6
            Callback functions may not fire on expected sequence
          • 3
            Unneeded over complication
          • 3
            Unstable
          • 3
            Breaking updates
          • 1
            No standard approach

          related Node.js posts

          Nick Rockwell
          SVP, Engineering at Fastly | 42 upvotes 路 1.5M views

          When I joined NYT there was already broad dissatisfaction with the LAMP (Linux Apache HTTP Server MySQL PHP) Stack and the front end framework, in particular. So, I wasn't passing judgment on it. I mean, LAMP's fine, you can do good work in LAMP. It's a little dated at this point, but it's not ... I didn't want to rip it out for its own sake, but everyone else was like, "We don't like this, it's really inflexible." And I remember from being outside the company when that was called MIT FIVE when it had launched. And been observing it from the outside, and I was like, you guys took so long to do that and you did it so carefully, and yet you're not happy with your decisions. Why is that? That was more the impetus. If we're going to do this again, how are we going to do it in a way that we're gonna get a better result?

          So we're moving quickly away from LAMP, I would say. So, right now, the new front end is React based and using Apollo. And we've been in a long, protracted, gradual rollout of the core experiences.

          React is now talking to GraphQL as a primary API. There's a Node.js back end, to the front end, which is mainly for server-side rendering, as well.

          Behind there, the main repository for the GraphQL server is a big table repository, that we call Bodega because it's a convenience store. And that reads off of a Kafka pipeline.

          See more
          Conor Myhrvold
          Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber | 38 upvotes 路 3.7M views

          How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

          Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

          Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

          https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

          (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

          Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

          See more
          ASP.NET logo

          ASP.NET

          20.1K
          5.6K
          7
          An open source web framework for building modern web apps and services with .NET
          20.1K
          5.6K
          + 1
          7
          PROS OF ASP.NET
          • 7
            Great mvc
          CONS OF ASP.NET
            Be the first to leave a con

            related ASP.NET posts

            Greg Neumann

            Finding the most effective dev stack for a solo developer. Over the past year, I've been looking at many tech stacks that would be 'best' for me, as a solo, indie, developer to deliver a desktop app (Windows & Mac) plus mobile - iOS mainly. Initially, Xamarin started to stand-out. Using .NET Core as the run-time, Xamarin as the native API provider and Xamarin Forms for the UI seemed to solve all issues. But, the cracks soon started to appear. Xamarin Forms is mobile only; the Windows incarnation is different. There is no Mac UI solution (you have to code it natively in Mac OS Storyboard. I was also worried how Xamarin Forms , if I was to use it, was going to cope, in future, with Apple's new SwiftUI and Google's new Fuchsia.

            This plethora of techs for the UI-layer made me reach for the safer waters of using Web-techs for the UI. Lovely! Consistency everywhere (well, mostly). But that consistency evaporates when platform issues are addressed. There are so many web frameworks!

            But, I made a simple decision. It's just me...I am clever, but there is no army of coders here. And I have big plans for a business app. How could just 1 developer go-on to deploy a decent app to Windows, iPhone, iPad & Mac OS? I remembered earlier days when I've used Microsoft's ASP.NET to scaffold - generate - loads of Code for a web-app that I needed for several charities that I worked with. What 'generators' exist that do a lot of the platform-specific rubbish, allow the necessary customisation of such platform integration and provide a decent UI?

            I've placed my colours to the Quasar Framework mast. Oh dear, that means Electron desktop apps doesn't it? Well, Ive had enough of loads of Developers saying that "the menus won't look native" or "it uses too much RAM" and so on. I've been using non-native UI-wrapped apps for ages - the date picker in Outlook on iOS is way better than the native date-picker and I'd been using it for years without getting hot under the collar about it. Developers do get so hung-up on things that busy Users hardly notice; don't you think?. As to the RAM usage issue; that's a bit true. But Users only really notice when an app uses so much RAM that the machine starts to page-out. Electron contributes towards that horizon but does not cause it. My Users will be business-users after all. Somewhat decent machines.

            Looking forward to all that lovely Vue.js around my TypeScript and all those really, really, b e a u t I f u l UI controls of Quasar Framework . Still not sure that 1 dev can deliver all that... but I'm up for trying...

            See more

            I found Heroku to be a great option to get ExpressJS up and running with very little hustle. The free tier is great, but I'd recommend to set up a cronjob to visit your site every few minutes so that the server stays awake. Netlify was the option to host the front-end because doing the server side rendering on #Heroku would have taken a little more time than I'd like to. For the moment pre-rendering the app with prerender-spa-plugin is enough to help with #seo. Puppeteer was my choice over other options because it made it easier to scrape websites made on ASP.NET which is what I needed in this case. And Vue.js is my top choice at the moment because it's really beginner friendly and it has a lot of the features I like about Angular 2 and React. vuex is a must in most of the app I build.

            See more