behave vs react-testing-library

Overview

behave

Stacks67

Followers119

Votes0

GitHub Stars3.4K

Forks656

react-testing-library

Stacks297

Followers156

Votes4

behave vs react-testing-library: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing behave and react-testing-library, there are several key differences that developers need to consider. These differences can impact the testing process and the overall efficiency of the testing framework.

Testing Scope: Behave is primarily used for behavior-driven testing in Python, focusing on the behavior of the entire system from the end-user's perspective. On the other hand, react-testing-library is more specific to testing React components and their interactions in isolation. The scope of testing differs significantly between the two frameworks.
Technology Compatibility: Behave is designed for Python-based applications or systems where behavior-driven development is crucial, while react-testing-library is specifically tailored for React applications. The compatibility with different technologies and frameworks is a significant distinguishing factor between these two testing tools.
DOM Manipulation Approach: React-testing-library promotes testing React components through interactions with the DOM elements and discourages direct manipulation of component internals. In contrast, behave focuses more on higher-level behavioral testing rather than specific DOM manipulation techniques. The approach to handling the DOM differs in these frameworks.
Testing Focus: Behave emphasizes testing the overall behavior of the system, including user interfaces, APIs, and backend functionality, providing a holistic view of the system's behavior. React-testing-library, however, focuses solely on testing React components and their interactions, making it more specialized in the React development environment.
Integration with Frameworks: Behave can integrate seamlessly with popular testing frameworks like Selenium and webdriver, enhancing its capabilities for end-to-end testing scenarios. React-testing-library, as a specialized tool for testing React components, may have limited integration capabilities with other testing frameworks beyond the React ecosystem.

In Summary, the key differences between behave and react-testing-library lie in their testing scope, technology compatibility, DOM manipulation approach, testing focus, and integration with frameworks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

behave	react-testing-library
It is behaviour-driven development, Python style. It uses tests written in a natural language style, backed up by Python code.	It is a simple and complete React DOM testing utility that encourage good testing practices. It provides light utility functions on top of react-dom and react-dom/test-utils, in a way that encourages better testing practices.
bdd; tests; tdd	light-weight solution for testing; React DOM testing utilities; works with any environment that provides DOM APIs;
Statistics
GitHub Stars 3.4K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 656	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 67	Stacks 297
Followers 119	Followers 156
Votes 0	Votes 4
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 3 We can test behavior 1 Good documentation
Integrations
Python Django Flask	Vue.js React AngularJS

What are some alternatives to behave, react-testing-library?

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Related Comparisons

behave vs react-testing-library: What are the differences?

Introduction

Testing Scope: Behave is primarily used for behavior-driven testing in Python, focusing on the behavior of the entire system from the end-user's perspective. On the other hand, react-testing-library is more specific to testing React components and their interactions in isolation. The scope of testing differs significantly between the two frameworks.
Technology Compatibility: Behave is designed for Python-based applications or systems where behavior-driven development is crucial, while react-testing-library is specifically tailored for React applications. The compatibility with different technologies and frameworks is a significant distinguishing factor between these two testing tools.
DOM Manipulation Approach: React-testing-library promotes testing React components through interactions with the DOM elements and discourages direct manipulation of component internals. In contrast, behave focuses more on higher-level behavioral testing rather than specific DOM manipulation techniques. The approach to handling the DOM differs in these frameworks.
Testing Focus: Behave emphasizes testing the overall behavior of the system, including user interfaces, APIs, and backend functionality, providing a holistic view of the system's behavior. React-testing-library, however, focuses solely on testing React components and their interactions, making it more specialized in the React development environment.
Integration with Frameworks: Behave can integrate seamlessly with popular testing frameworks like Selenium and webdriver, enhancing its capabilities for end-to-end testing scenarios. React-testing-library, as a specialized tool for testing React components, may have limited integration capabilities with other testing frameworks beyond the React ecosystem.

behave vs react-testing-library

Overview