BeyondTrust vs HashiCorp Boundary

Overview

BeyondTrust

Stacks10

Followers19

Votes0

HashiCorp Boundary

Stacks22

Followers40

Votes0

GitHub Stars4.0K

Forks299

BeyondTrust vs HashiCorp Boundary: What are the differences?

Introduction

In comparing BeyondTrust and HashiCorp Boundary, it is important to understand the key differences between these two privileged access management solutions.

Architecture: BeyondTrust follows a traditional client-server architecture where the BeyondTrust server communicates with endpoints to manage access. In contrast, HashiCorp Boundary utilizes a cloud-native architecture that is based on microservices and APIs, allowing it to scale more easily in cloud environments.
Scope of Access Control: BeyondTrust focuses primarily on managing privileged access to servers, endpoints, and other critical systems within an organization. On the other hand, HashiCorp Boundary takes a broader approach by extending access management to applications, databases, and other resources, offering a more comprehensive solution for access control.
Scalability and Flexibility: BeyondTrust is designed to work well in on-premises environments and is suited for larger enterprises with complex infrastructure. In comparison, HashiCorp Boundary is purpose-built for cloud-native architectures and provides more flexibility in dynamically managing access across hybrid and multi-cloud environments.
Authentication Mechanisms: BeyondTrust offers authentication options such as username/password, SSH keys, and multi-factor authentication. HashiCorp Boundary, on the other hand, relies on integrations with identity providers and supports various authentication methods, including OAuth, LDAP, SAML, and OIDC, making it more versatile in authentication management.
Workflow Automation: BeyondTrust focuses on manual approval workflows for granting access permissions, which may be suitable for organizations with strict security policies. In contrast, HashiCorp Boundary provides more automation capabilities through policies and dynamic access controls, enabling organizations to streamline access management processes.
Community and Support: BeyondTrust offers comprehensive support services and has a well-established user community. In comparison, HashiCorp Boundary, being a newer solution, has a growing community and relies heavily on documentation and community forums for support resources.

In Summary, BeyondTrust and HashiCorp Boundary differ in their architecture, scope of access control, scalability, authentication mechanisms, workflow automation, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

BeyondTrust	HashiCorp Boundary
It supports a family of privileged identity management, privileged remote access, and vulnerability management products for UNIX, Linux, Windows and Mac OS operating systems.	Simple and secure remote access — to any system anywhere based on trusted identity. It enables practitioners and operators to securely access dynamic hosts and services with fine-grained authorization without requiring direct network access.
Universal Privilege Management; More Than Just Passwords; Frictionless experience for users; Handle critical tasks that keep your business running	Identity-based access; Session management; Platform agnostic; Session visibility; Infrastructure as code; Manage dynamic environments
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 4.0K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 299
Stacks 10	Stacks 22
Followers 19	Followers 40
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Linux macOS Windows	Terraform

What are some alternatives to BeyondTrust, HashiCorp Boundary?

AWS IAM

It enables you to manage access to AWS services and resources securely. Using IAM, you can create and manage AWS users and groups, and use permissions to allow and deny their access to AWS resources.

Identity Management Simplified

Keycloak Enterprise-grade identity & access management, fully managed! Enable user authentication and authorization in minutes, so you can keep growing.

Teleport

Teleport makes it easy for users to securely access infrastructure and meet the toughest compliance requirements. Teleport replaces shared credentials with short-lived certificates and is completely transparent to client-side tools.

SailPoint

It provides enterprise identity governance solutions with on-premises and cloud-based identity management software for the most complex challenges.

AWS Service Catalog

AWS Service Catalog allows IT administrators to create, manage, and distribute catalogs of approved products to end users, who can then access the products they need in a personalized portal. Administrators can control which users have access to each application or AWS resource to enforce compliance with organizational business policies. AWS Service Catalog allows your organization to benefit from increased agility and reduced costs because end users can find and launch only the products they need from a catalog that you control.

Infra

It enables you to discover and access infrastructure (e.g. Kubernetes, databases). We help you connect an identity provider such as Okta or Azure active directory, and map users/groups with the permissions you set to your infrastructure.

Oathkeeper

A cloud native Identity & Access Proxy (IAP) which authenticates and authorizes incoming HTTP requests. Inspired by the BeyondCorp / Zero Trust white paper. Written in Go.

Key Vault Access Policy

It determines whether a given service principal, namely an application or user group, can perform different operations on Key Vault secrets, keys, and certificates. You can assign access policies using the Azure portal, the Azure CLI, or Azure PowerShell.

GCP IAM

It lets you create and manage permissions for Google Cloud resources. IAM unifies access control for Google Cloud services into a single system and presents a consistent set of operations.

Thycotic Secret Server

It is an enterprise-grade, privileged access management solution that is quickly deployable and easily managed. You can automatically discover and manage your privileged accounts through an intuitive interface, protecting against malicious activity, enterprise-wide.

Related Comparisons

Postman vs Swagger UI

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope

BeyondTrust vs HashiCorp Boundary: What are the differences?

Introduction

In comparing BeyondTrust and HashiCorp Boundary, it is important to understand the key differences between these two privileged access management solutions.

Architecture: BeyondTrust follows a traditional client-server architecture where the BeyondTrust server communicates with endpoints to manage access. In contrast, HashiCorp Boundary utilizes a cloud-native architecture that is based on microservices and APIs, allowing it to scale more easily in cloud environments.
Scope of Access Control: BeyondTrust focuses primarily on managing privileged access to servers, endpoints, and other critical systems within an organization. On the other hand, HashiCorp Boundary takes a broader approach by extending access management to applications, databases, and other resources, offering a more comprehensive solution for access control.
Scalability and Flexibility: BeyondTrust is designed to work well in on-premises environments and is suited for larger enterprises with complex infrastructure. In comparison, HashiCorp Boundary is purpose-built for cloud-native architectures and provides more flexibility in dynamically managing access across hybrid and multi-cloud environments.
Authentication Mechanisms: BeyondTrust offers authentication options such as username/password, SSH keys, and multi-factor authentication. HashiCorp Boundary, on the other hand, relies on integrations with identity providers and supports various authentication methods, including OAuth, LDAP, SAML, and OIDC, making it more versatile in authentication management.
Workflow Automation: BeyondTrust focuses on manual approval workflows for granting access permissions, which may be suitable for organizations with strict security policies. In contrast, HashiCorp Boundary provides more automation capabilities through policies and dynamic access controls, enabling organizations to streamline access management processes.
Community and Support: BeyondTrust offers comprehensive support services and has a well-established user community. In comparison, HashiCorp Boundary, being a newer solution, has a growing community and relies heavily on documentation and community forums for support resources.

In Summary, BeyondTrust and HashiCorp Boundary differ in their architecture, scope of access control, scalability, authentication mechanisms, workflow automation, and community support.