Alternatives to Bokeh logo

Alternatives to Bokeh

Plotly.js, Matplotlib, Dash, D3.js, and Tableau are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Bokeh.
95
12

What is Bokeh and what are its top alternatives?

Bokeh is an interactive visualization library for modern web browsers. It provides elegant, concise construction of versatile graphics, and affords high-performance interactivity over large or streaming datasets.
Bokeh is a tool in the Charting Libraries category of a tech stack.
Bokeh is an open source tool with 19.3K GitHub stars and 4.2K GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Bokeh's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Bokeh

  • Plotly.js
    Plotly.js

    It is a standalone Javascript data visualization library, and it also powers the Python and R modules named plotly in those respective ecosystems (referred to as Plotly.py and Plotly.R). It can be used to produce dozens of chart types and visualizations, including statistical charts, 3D graphs, scientific charts, SVG and tile maps, financial charts and more. ...

  • Matplotlib
    Matplotlib

    It is a Python 2D plotting library which produces publication quality figures in a variety of hardcopy formats and interactive environments across platforms. It can be used in Python scripts, the Python and IPython shells, the Jupyter notebook, web application servers, and four graphical user interface toolkits. ...

  • Dash
    Dash

    Dash is an API Documentation Browser and Code Snippet Manager. Dash stores snippets of code and instantly searches offline documentation sets for 150+ APIs. You can even generate your own docsets or request docsets to be included. ...

  • D3.js
    D3.js

    It is a JavaScript library for manipulating documents based on data. Emphasises on web standards gives you the full capabilities of modern browsers without tying yourself to a proprietary framework. ...

  • Tableau
    Tableau

    Tableau can help anyone see and understand their data. Connect to almost any database, drag and drop to create visualizations, and share with a click. ...

  • Shiny
    Shiny

    It is an open source R package that provides an elegant and powerful web framework for building web applications using R. It helps you turn your analyses into interactive web applications without requiring HTML, CSS, or JavaScript knowledge. ...

  • jQuery
    jQuery

    jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML. ...

  • React
    React

    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project. ...

Bokeh alternatives & related posts

Plotly.js logo

Plotly.js

358
690
69
A high-level, declarative charting library
358
690
+ 1
69
PROS OF PLOTLY.JS
  • 16
    Bindings to popular languages like Python, Node, R, etc
  • 10
    Integrated zoom and filter-out tools in charts and maps
  • 9
    Great support for complex and multiple axes
  • 8
    Powerful out-of-the-box featureset
  • 6
    Beautiful visualizations
  • 4
    Active user base
  • 4
    Impressive support for webgl 3D charts
  • 3
    Charts are easy to share with a cloud account
  • 3
    Webgl chart types are extremely performant
  • 2
    Interactive charts
  • 2
    Easy to use online editor for creating plotly.js charts
  • 2
    Publication quality image export
CONS OF PLOTLY.JS
  • 18
    Terrible document

related Plotly.js posts

Tim Abbott
Shared insights
on
Plotly.jsPlotly.jsD3.jsD3.js
at

We use Plotly (just their open source stuff) for Zulip's user-facing and admin-facing statistics graphs because it's a reasonably well-designed JavaScript graphing library.

If you've tried using D3.js, it's a pretty poor developer experience, and that translates to spending a bunch of time getting the graphs one wants even for things that are conceptually pretty basic. Plotly isn't amazing (it's decent), but it's way better than than D3 unless you have very specialized needs.

See more

Here is my stack on #Visualization. @FusionCharts and Highcharts are easy to use but only free for non-commercial. Chart.js and Plotly are two lovely tools for commercial use under the MIT license. And D3.js would be my last choice only if a complex customized plot is needed.

See more
Matplotlib logo

Matplotlib

1.3K
329
11
A plotting library for the Python programming language
1.3K
329
+ 1
11
PROS OF MATPLOTLIB
  • 11
    The standard Swiss Army Knife of plotting
CONS OF MATPLOTLIB
  • 5
    Lots of code

related Matplotlib posts

Shared insights
on
MatplotlibMatplotlibBokehBokehDjangoDjango

Hi - I am looking to develop an app accessed by a browser that will display interactive networks (including adding or deleting nodes, edges, labels (or changing labels) based on user input. Look to use Django at the backend. Also need to manage graph versions if one person makes a graph change while another person is looking at it. Mainly tree networks for starters anyway. I probably will use the Networkx package. Not sure what the pros and cons are using Bokeh vs Matplotlib. I would be grateful for any comments or suggestions. Thanks.

See more
Dash logo

Dash

319
408
63
Gives your Mac instant offline access to 150+ API documentation sets
319
408
+ 1
63
PROS OF DASH
  • 17
    Dozens of API docs and Cheat-Sheets
  • 12
    Great for offline use
  • 8
    Works with Alfred
  • 8
    Excellent documentation
  • 8
    Quick API search
  • 5
    Fast
  • 3
    Good integration with Xcode and AppCode
  • 2
    Great for mobile dev work
CONS OF DASH
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Dash posts

    D3.js logo

    D3.js

    1.9K
    1.7K
    653
    A JavaScript visualization library for HTML and SVG
    1.9K
    1.7K
    + 1
    653
    PROS OF D3.JS
    • 195
      Beautiful visualizations
    • 103
      Svg
    • 92
      Data-driven
    • 81
      Large set of examples
    • 61
      Data-driven documents
    • 24
      Visualization components
    • 20
      Transitions
    • 18
      Dynamic properties
    • 16
      Plugins
    • 11
      Transformation
    • 7
      Makes data interactive
    • 4
      Open Source
    • 4
      Enter and Exit
    • 4
      Components
    • 3
      Exhaustive
    • 3
      Backed by the new york times
    • 2
      Easy and beautiful
    • 1
      Highly customizable
    • 1
      Awesome Community Support
    • 1
      Simple elegance
    • 1
      Templates, force template
    • 1
      Angular 4
    CONS OF D3.JS
    • 11
      Beginners cant understand at all
    • 6
      Complex syntax

    related D3.js posts

    Tim Abbott
    Shared insights
    on
    Plotly.jsPlotly.jsD3.jsD3.js
    at

    We use Plotly (just their open source stuff) for Zulip's user-facing and admin-facing statistics graphs because it's a reasonably well-designed JavaScript graphing library.

    If you've tried using D3.js, it's a pretty poor developer experience, and that translates to spending a bunch of time getting the graphs one wants even for things that are conceptually pretty basic. Plotly isn't amazing (it's decent), but it's way better than than D3 unless you have very specialized needs.

    See more
    Amit Garg
    Shared insights
    on
    D3.jsD3.jsApexChartsApexChartsReactReact

    Hi,

    I am looking at integrating a charting library in my React frontend that allows me to create appealing and interactive charts. I have basic familiarity with ApexCharts with React but have also read about D3.js charts and it seems a much more involved integration. Can someone please share their experience across the two libraries on the following dimensions:

    1. Amount of work needed for integration
    2. Amount of work or ease for creating new charts in either of the libraries.

    Regards

    Amit

    See more
    Tableau logo

    Tableau

    1.3K
    1.3K
    8
    Tableau helps people see and understand data.
    1.3K
    1.3K
    + 1
    8
    PROS OF TABLEAU
    • 6
      Capable of visualising billions of rows
    • 1
      Intuitive and easy to learn
    • 1
      Responsive
    CONS OF TABLEAU
    • 3
      Very expensive for small companies

    related Tableau posts

    Looking for the best analytics software for a medium-large-sized firm. We currently use a Microsoft SQL Server database that is analyzed in Tableau desktop/published to Tableau online for users to access dashboards. Is it worth the cost savings/time to switch over to using SSRS or Power BI? Does anyone have experience migrating from Tableau to SSRS /or Power BI? Our other option is to consider using Tableau on-premises instead of online. Using custom SQL with over 3 million rows really decreases performances and results in processing times that greatly exceed our typical experience. Thanks.

    See more
    Shared insights
    on
    TableauTableauQlikQlikPowerBIPowerBI

    Hello everyone,

    My team and I are currently in the process of selecting a Business Intelligence (BI) tool for our actively developing company, which has over 500 employees. We are considering open-source options.

    We are keen to connect with a Head of Analytics or BI Analytics professional who has extensive experience working with any of these systems and is willing to share their insights. Ideally, we would like to speak with someone from companies that have transitioned from proprietary BI tools (such as PowerBI, Qlik, or Tableau) to open-source BI tools, or vice versa.

    If you have any contacts or recommendations for individuals we could reach out to regarding this matter, we would greatly appreciate it. Additionally, if you are personally willing to share your experiences, please feel free to reach out to me directly. Thank you!

    See more
    Shiny logo

    Shiny

    207
    224
    13
    An R package that makes it easy to build interactive web apps
    207
    224
    + 1
    13
    PROS OF SHINY
    • 8
      R Compatibility
    • 3
      Free
    • 2
      Highly customizable and extensible
    CONS OF SHINY
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Shiny posts

      jQuery logo

      jQuery

      191.7K
      68.1K
      6.6K
      The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.
      191.7K
      68.1K
      + 1
      6.6K
      PROS OF JQUERY
      • 1.3K
        Cross-browser
      • 957
        Dom manipulation
      • 809
        Power
      • 660
        Open source
      • 610
        Plugins
      • 459
        Easy
      • 395
        Popular
      • 350
        Feature-rich
      • 281
        Html5
      • 227
        Light weight
      • 93
        Simple
      • 84
        Great community
      • 79
        CSS3 Compliant
      • 69
        Mobile friendly
      • 67
        Fast
      • 43
        Intuitive
      • 42
        Swiss Army knife for webdev
      • 35
        Huge Community
      • 11
        Easy to learn
      • 4
        Clean code
      • 3
        Because of Ajax request :)
      • 2
        Powerful
      • 2
        Nice
      • 2
        Just awesome
      • 2
        Used everywhere
      • 1
        Improves productivity
      • 1
        Javascript
      • 1
        Easy Setup
      • 1
        Open Source, Simple, Easy Setup
      • 1
        It Just Works
      • 1
        Industry acceptance
      • 1
        Allows great manipulation of HTML and CSS
      • 1
        Widely Used
      • 1
        I love jQuery
      CONS OF JQUERY
      • 6
        Large size
      • 5
        Sometimes inconsistent API
      • 5
        Encourages DOM as primary data source
      • 2
        Live events is overly complex feature

      related jQuery posts

      Kir Shatrov
      Engineering Lead at Shopify · | 22 upvotes · 2.4M views

      The client-side stack of Shopify Admin has been a long journey. It started with HTML templates, jQuery and Prototype. We moved to Batman.js, our in-house Single-Page-Application framework (SPA), in 2013. Then, we re-evaluated our approach and moved back to statically rendered HTML and vanilla JavaScript. As the front-end ecosystem matured, we felt that it was time to rethink our approach again. Last year, we started working on moving Shopify Admin to React and TypeScript.

      Many things have changed since the days of jQuery and Batman. JavaScript execution is much faster. We can easily render our apps on the server to do less work on the client, and the resources and tooling for developers are substantially better with React than we ever had with Batman.

      #FrameworksFullStack #Languages

      See more
      Ganesa Vijayakumar
      Full Stack Coder | Technical Architect · | 19 upvotes · 5.3M views

      I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

      I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

      As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

      UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

      Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

      Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

      Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

      Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

      Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

      Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

      Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

      Thanks, Ganesa

      See more
      React logo

      React

      172.7K
      142.6K
      4.1K
      A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
      172.7K
      142.6K
      + 1
      4.1K
      PROS OF REACT
      • 832
        Components
      • 673
        Virtual dom
      • 578
        Performance
      • 508
        Simplicity
      • 442
        Composable
      • 186
        Data flow
      • 166
        Declarative
      • 128
        Isn't an mvc framework
      • 120
        Reactive updates
      • 115
        Explicit app state
      • 50
        JSX
      • 29
        Learn once, write everywhere
      • 22
        Easy to Use
      • 21
        Uni-directional data flow
      • 17
        Works great with Flux Architecture
      • 11
        Great perfomance
      • 10
        Javascript
      • 9
        Built by Facebook
      • 8
        TypeScript support
      • 6
        Server Side Rendering
      • 6
        Speed
      • 5
        Feels like the 90s
      • 5
        Excellent Documentation
      • 5
        Props
      • 5
        Functional
      • 5
        Easy as Lego
      • 5
        Closer to standard JavaScript and HTML than others
      • 5
        Cross-platform
      • 5
        Easy to start
      • 5
        Hooks
      • 5
        Awesome
      • 5
        Scalable
      • 4
        Super easy
      • 4
        Allows creating single page applications
      • 4
        Server side views
      • 4
        Sdfsdfsdf
      • 4
        Start simple
      • 4
        Strong Community
      • 4
        Fancy third party tools
      • 4
        Scales super well
      • 3
        Has arrow functions
      • 3
        Beautiful and Neat Component Management
      • 3
        Just the View of MVC
      • 3
        Simple, easy to reason about and makes you productive
      • 3
        Fast evolving
      • 3
        SSR
      • 3
        Great migration pathway for older systems
      • 3
        Rich ecosystem
      • 3
        Simple
      • 3
        Has functional components
      • 3
        Every decision architecture wise makes sense
      • 3
        Very gentle learning curve
      • 2
        Split your UI into components with one true state
      • 2
        Image upload
      • 2
        Permissively-licensed
      • 2
        Fragments
      • 2
        Sharable
      • 2
        Recharts
      • 2
        HTML-like
      • 1
        React hooks
      • 1
        Datatables
      CONS OF REACT
      • 41
        Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
      • 30
        No predefined way to structure your app
      • 29
        Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
      • 13
        JSX
      • 10
        Not enterprise friendly
      • 6
        One-way binding only
      • 3
        State consistency with backend neglected
      • 3
        Bad Documentation
      • 2
        Error boundary is needed
      • 2
        Paradigms change too fast

      related React posts

      Johnny Bell

      I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go.

      I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free!

      I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling.

      Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting. I did some research and I found Netlify. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.

      Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master.

      With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent.

      If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost.

      See more
      Collins Ogbuzuru
      Front-end dev at Evolve credit · | 37 upvotes · 245.2K views

      Your tech stack is solid for building a real-time messaging project.

      React and React Native are excellent choices for the frontend, especially if you want to have both web and mobile versions of your application share code.

      ExpressJS is an unopinionated framework that affords you the flexibility to use it's features at your term, which is a good start. However, I would recommend you explore Sails.js as well. Sails.js is built on top of Express.js and it provides additional features out of the box, especially the Websocket integration that your project requires.

      Don't forget to set up Graphql codegen, this would improve your dev experience (Add Typescript, if you can too).

      I don't know much about databases but you might want to consider using NO-SQL. I used Firebase real-time db and aws dynamo db on a few of my personal projects and I love they're easy to work with and offer more flexibility for a chat application.

      See more