1. Concurrency: Boost provides extensive support for concurrency through its Thread and Asio libraries. It offers various types of synchronization mechanisms, such as mutexes, condition variables, and atomic operations. In contrast, Go has built-in support for concurrency with Goroutines and channels. Goroutines simplify the creation of lightweight threads, and channels enable easy communication and synchronization between Goroutines.

2. Memory Management: Boost relies on manual memory management, and developers need to explicitly allocate and deallocate memory using functions like 'new' and 'delete'. On the other hand, Go features an automatic garbage collector that handles the memory management tasks for developers. This eliminates the need for explicit memory management, making Go more beginner-friendly and reducing the chances of memory leaks.

3. Type System: Boost is a C++ library and inherits the type system of C++. It allows developers to work with complex types, such as templates and generics, providing high flexibility but potentially adding complexity. In contrast, Go has a simpler and more lightweight type system. It does not support generics, but its built-in types and interfaces make it easier to write clean and readable code.

4. Error Handling: Boost primarily uses exception handling for handling errors. Exceptions can be thrown, caught, and propagated within the code. Go takes a different approach to error handling by utilizing multiple return values. Functions in Go commonly return an error as a second return value, allowing developers to handle errors in a more explicit and manageable way.

5. Package Management: Boost provides a collection of diverse libraries in a single package. Developers can selectively include the required libraries in their projects based on their needs. Conversely, Go has a built-in package management system called 'go modules'. It allows developers to specify external dependencies and manages the versioning and downloading of required packages automatically.

6. Compilation and Execution: Boost is typically compiled ahead of time, resulting in a larger binary size. However, it offers high performance and fine-grained control over the code optimization. In contrast, Go uses a just-in-time (JIT) compilation approach, resulting in smaller binaries. While Go sacrifices some performance benefits, it allows for faster development iterations and easier deployment.

In Summary, Boost provides advanced features for concurrency and complex type systems, whereas Go offers simpler concurrency models, automatic memory management, and more explicit error handling. The choice between Boost and Go depends on the specific project requirements and developer preferences.