Buffalo vs Django REST framework

Overview

Django REST framework

Stacks1.9K

Followers2.1K

Votes312

Buffalo

Stacks13

Followers50

Votes5

GitHub Stars8.3K

Forks585

Buffalo vs Django REST framework: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Buffalo and Django REST framework, there are several key differences that set these two web frameworks apart in terms of functionality and usability.

Project Structure: Buffalo follows a conventional project structure which makes it easier for developers to navigate and maintain code. On the other hand, Django REST framework provides flexibility in project structure, allowing developers to organize code based on their preferences.
Performance: Buffalo is known for its fast performance due to being designed in GoLang, while Django REST framework's performance can be affected by the Python language overhead. This difference in performance can be crucial for high-traffic applications.
Language Support: Buffalo uses GoLang, a statically typed language, which ensures better type safety and performance. Django REST framework, on the other hand, uses Python, which is dynamically typed and allows for rapid development but can lead to more errors at runtime.
Community and Ecosystem: Django REST framework has a larger and more active community compared to Buffalo. This means there are more resources, tutorials, and integrations available for Django, making it easier for developers to find help and solutions to problems they may encounter during development.
Built-in Features: Django REST framework comes with a wide range of built-in features such as authentication, serialization, and viewsets, which makes it easier to develop REST APIs quickly. Buffalo, while also providing similar functionality, may require additional libraries or customization to achieve the same level of functionality.
Learning Curve: Buffalo is known for its simplicity and ease of learning, making it a great choice for beginners. On the other hand, Django REST framework has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features and configurations, which can be overwhelming for new developers.

In Summary, the key differences between Buffalo and Django REST framework lie in their project structure, performance, language support, community, built-in features, and learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Django REST framework	Buffalo
It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.	Buffalo is Go web framework. Yeah, I hate the word "framework" too! Buffalo is different though. Buffalo doesn't want to re-invent wheels like routing and templating. Buffalo is glue that wraps all of the best packages available and makes them all play nicely together.
The Web browsable API is a huge usability win for your developers.;Authentication policies including OAuth1a and OAuth2 out of the box.;Serialization that supports both ORM and non-ORM data sources.;Customizable all the way down - just use regular function-based views if you don't need the more powerful features.;Extensive documentation, and great community support.;Used and trusted by large companies such as Mozilla and Eventbrite.	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 8.3K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 585
Stacks 1.9K	Stacks 13
Followers 2.1K	Followers 50
Votes 312	Votes 5
Pros & Cons
Pros 67 Easy to use 65 Browsable api 53 Great documentation 51 Customizable 42 Fast development Cons 2 Reimplements Django functionality 2 Bad documentation 1 No support for URL Namespaces 0 Bad CSRF handling	Pros 4 Go 1 Friendly Api
Integrations
Rollbar Sentry Django Stream Kloudless	Golang

What are some alternatives to Django REST framework, Buffalo?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Buffalo vs Django REST framework: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Buffalo and Django REST framework, there are several key differences that set these two web frameworks apart in terms of functionality and usability.

Project Structure: Buffalo follows a conventional project structure which makes it easier for developers to navigate and maintain code. On the other hand, Django REST framework provides flexibility in project structure, allowing developers to organize code based on their preferences.
Performance: Buffalo is known for its fast performance due to being designed in GoLang, while Django REST framework's performance can be affected by the Python language overhead. This difference in performance can be crucial for high-traffic applications.
Language Support: Buffalo uses GoLang, a statically typed language, which ensures better type safety and performance. Django REST framework, on the other hand, uses Python, which is dynamically typed and allows for rapid development but can lead to more errors at runtime.
Community and Ecosystem: Django REST framework has a larger and more active community compared to Buffalo. This means there are more resources, tutorials, and integrations available for Django, making it easier for developers to find help and solutions to problems they may encounter during development.
Built-in Features: Django REST framework comes with a wide range of built-in features such as authentication, serialization, and viewsets, which makes it easier to develop REST APIs quickly. Buffalo, while also providing similar functionality, may require additional libraries or customization to achieve the same level of functionality.
Learning Curve: Buffalo is known for its simplicity and ease of learning, making it a great choice for beginners. On the other hand, Django REST framework has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features and configurations, which can be overwhelming for new developers.

In Summary, the key differences between Buffalo and Django REST framework lie in their project structure, performance, language support, community, built-in features, and learning curve.