StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Log Management
  4. Logging Tools
  5. Bunyan vs SwiftyBeaver

Bunyan vs SwiftyBeaver

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SwiftyBeaver
SwiftyBeaver
Stacks7
Followers18
Votes0
Bunyan
Bunyan
Stacks315
Followers15
Votes0
GitHub Stars7.2K
Forks517

Bunyan vs SwiftyBeaver: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Bunyan and SwiftyBeaver, two popular logging frameworks for iOS development, there are key differences that developers should consider before choosing one for their projects.

  1. Language Compatibility: Bunyan is primarily designed for Node.js, making it ideal for server-side JavaScript applications, whereas SwiftyBeaver is specifically tailored for Swift, the programming language for iOS and macOS development. This difference in language compatibility can heavily influence the decision-making process for developers based on the platform they are working on.

  2. Integration with Xcode: SwiftyBeaver offers seamless integration with Xcode, providing real-time log viewing and filtering directly within the Xcode console. On the other hand, Bunyan lacks this level of integration with Xcode, requiring developers to rely on external tools or terminal windows for log monitoring. This difference can significantly impact the development workflow and convenience for iOS developers.

  3. Customization Capabilities: While both Bunyan and SwiftyBeaver allow for log customization, SwiftyBeaver offers a more visually appealing and user-friendly interface for tailoring log formats, colors, and filtering options. In contrast, Bunyan, being more command-line oriented, may require more manual configuration for advanced log customization. This distinction can affect how quickly and effectively developers can adapt the logging framework to their specific needs.

In Summary, developers should consider the language compatibility, integration with Xcode, and customization capabilities when choosing between Bunyan and SwiftyBeaver for their iOS projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SwiftyBeaver
SwiftyBeaver
Bunyan
Bunyan

It is Swift-based logging framework for iOS and macOS. It has different types of log messages where also we can filter logs to make bug checking even easier and has a free license plan.

It is a simple and fast JSON logging module for node.js services. It has extensible streams system for controlling where log records go (to a stream, to a file, log file rotation, etc.)

Time (with microsecond precision); Level (output in color); Thread name (if not main thread); Filename, function & line; Message (can be string or a variable of any type)
Elegant log method API; Extensible streams system for controlling where log records go (to a stream, to a file, log file rotation, etc.); bunyan CLI for pretty-printing and filtering of Bunyan logs; simple include of log call source location (file, line, function) with src: true; lightweight specialization of Logger instances with log.child; Custom rendering of logged objects with "serializers"; Runtime log snooping via DTrace support; Support for a few runtime environments: Node.js, Browserify, Webpack, NW.js
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
7.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
517
Stacks
7
Stacks
315
Followers
18
Followers
15
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Swift
Swift
Xcode
Xcode
SQLite
SQLite
macOS
macOS
Node.js
Node.js
Restify
Restify
Webpack
Webpack
Browserify
Browserify

What are some alternatives to SwiftyBeaver, Bunyan?

Seq

Seq

Seq is a self-hosted server for structured log search, analysis, and alerting. It can be hosted on Windows or Linux/Docker, and has integrations for most popular structured logging libraries.

Loki

Loki

Loki is a horizontally-scalable, highly-available, multi-tenant log aggregation system inspired by Prometheus. It is designed to be very cost effective and easy to operate, as it does not index the contents of the logs, but rather a set of labels for each log stream.

Log4j

Log4j

It is an open source logging framework. With this tool – logging behavior can be controlled by editing a configuration file only without touching the application binary and can be used to store the Selenium Automation flow logs.

Castle Core

Castle Core

It provides common Castle Project abstractions including logging services. It also features Castle DynamicProxy a lightweight runtime proxy generator, and Castle DictionaryAdapter.

Fluent Bit

Fluent Bit

It is a super fast, lightweight, and highly scalable logging and metrics processor and forwarder. It is the preferred choice for cloud and containerized environments.

CocoaLumberjack

CocoaLumberjack

CocoaLumberjack is a fast & simple, yet powerful & flexible logging framework for Mac and iOS.

uno

uno

We built uno, a small tool similar to uniq (the UNIX CLI tool that removes duplicates) - but with fuzziness. uno considers two lines to be equal if their edit distance is less than a specified threshold, by default set to 30%. It reads from stdin and prints the deduplicated lines to stdout.

Zap

Zap

Zap takes a different approach. It includes a reflection-free, zero-allocation JSON encoder, and the base Logger strives to avoid serialization overhead and allocations wherever possible. By building the high-level SugaredLogger on that foundation, zap lets users choose when they need to count every allocation and when they'd prefer a more familiar, loosely typed API.

NanoLog

NanoLog

It is an extremely performant nanosecond scale logging system for C++ that exposes a simple printf-like API and achieves over 80 million logs/second at a median latency of just over 7 nanoseconds.

LogDevice

LogDevice

LogDevice is a scalable and fault tolerant distributed log system. While a file-system stores and serves data organized as files, a log system stores and delivers data organized as logs. The log can be viewed as a record-oriented, append-only, and trimmable file.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana