StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. CakePHP vs Next.js

CakePHP vs Next.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CakePHP
CakePHP
Stacks672
Followers401
Votes137
GitHub Stars8.8K
Forks3.4K
Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K

CakePHP vs Next.js: What are the differences?

Introduction: CakePHP and Next.js are two popular frameworks used for web development. While both frameworks are used to build dynamic web applications, they have several key differences that set them apart.

  1. Language: CakePHP is written in PHP, a popular server-side scripting language, while Next.js is written in JavaScript, which is a versatile and widely-used programming language. This difference in language affects the syntax and coding style used in each framework.

  2. Backend vs Frontend: CakePHP is primarily a backend framework, focused on server-side development and providing a robust foundation for building web applications. In contrast, Next.js is primarily a frontend framework that allows developers to build and render React components on the server-side. It is commonly used for building single-page applications (SPAs) and progressive web applications (PWAs).

  3. Routing: CakePHP uses a convention-based routing system, where URLs map directly to controller actions. This simplifies the routing setup but can be less flexible for complex routing requirements. On the other hand, Next.js uses file-based routing, where every file in the pages directory corresponds to a route. This gives developers more control and flexibility over routing, allowing for custom routes and dynamic routes.

  4. Rendering: CakePHP uses server-side rendering (SSR), where the server generates the HTML content that is sent to the client. This approach ensures that the user receives a fully-rendered page, but it may result in slower initial load times. Next.js, on the other hand, supports both server-side rendering (SSR) and static site generation (SSG). This enables pre-rendering of pages during build time, leading to faster initial load times and improved performance.

  5. Ecosystem and Community: CakePHP has a long-standing history and a large community of developers. It has a mature ecosystem with a wide range of plugins, extensions, and community support. Next.js, on the other hand, has gained popularity more recently, but it has a rapidly growing community and an active ecosystem. It benefits from the wider JavaScript ecosystem and the popularity of React.

  6. Learning Curve and Complexity: CakePHP follows the convention over configuration principle, which means it provides a set of predefined conventions that simplify development but may limit flexibility in some cases. Next.js, on the other hand, requires more knowledge of JavaScript, React, and the Next.js framework itself. It offers more flexibility but also comes with a steeper learning curve and increased complexity.

In summary, CakePHP and Next.js differ in the programming language used, their primary focus on backend or frontend development, the routing system they employ, the rendering approach they support, the size and maturity of their ecosystems, and the learning curve and complexity involved in using them.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on CakePHP, Next.js

Yucen
Yucen

Feb 23, 2021

Decided

We choose Next.js for our React framework because it's very minimal and has a very organized file structure. Also, it offers key features like zero setups, automatic server rendering and code splitting, typescript support. Our app requires some loading time to process the video, server-side rendering will allow our website to display faster than client-side rending.

312k views312k
Comments
Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments
Fronted
Fronted

Nov 23, 2020

Decided

We’re a new startup so we need to be able to deliver quick changes as we find our product market fit. We’ve also got to ensure that we’re moving money safely, and keeping perfect records. The technologies we’ve chosen mix mature but well maintained frameworks like Django, with modern web-first and api-first front ends like GraphQL, NextJS, and Chakra. We use a little Golang sparingly in our backend to ensure that when we interact with financial services, we do so with statically compiled, strongly typed, and strictly limited and reviewed code.

You can read all about it in our linked blog post.

720k views720k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

CakePHP
CakePHP
Next.js
Next.js

It makes building web applications simpler, faster, while requiring less code. A modern PHP 7 framework offering a flexible database access layer and a powerful scaffolding system.

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

Use code generation and scaffolding features to rapidly build prototypes; No complicated XML or YAML files. Just setup your database and you're ready to bake; Instead of having to plan where things go, CakePHP comes with a set of conventions to guide you in developing your application; The things you need are built-in. Translations, database access, caching, validation, authentication, and much more are all built into one of the original PHP MVC frameworks
Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.8K
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
29.7K
Stacks
672
Stacks
8.0K
Followers
401
Followers
5.1K
Votes
137
Votes
330
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 35
    Open source
  • 25
    Really rapid framework
  • 19
    Good code organization
  • 13
    Flexibility
  • 10
    Security best practices
Cons
  • 1
    Follows Good Programming Practices
  • 1
    Robust Baking Tool
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Integrations
PHP
PHP
React
React

What are some alternatives to CakePHP, Next.js?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase