StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Casbin vs JSON Web Token

Casbin vs JSON Web Token

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token
Stacks1.8K
Followers367
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.7K
Forks374
Casbin
Casbin
Stacks39
Followers78
Votes0
GitHub Stars19.4K
Forks1.7K

Casbin vs JSON Web Token: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will provide key differences between Casbin and JSON Web Token (JWT).

  1. Authorization Policy vs Authentication Token: Casbin is primarily an authorization library that focuses on enforcing access control policies based on various parameters such as subject, object, action, etc. On the other hand, JSON Web Token (JWT) is a cryptographic token used for authentication and information exchange. While Casbin focuses on policy enforcement, JWT focuses on providing a secure and tamper-proof authentication mechanism.

  2. Policy-Centric vs Token-Centric: Casbin follows a policy-centric approach, where access control policies are defined and enforced based on various attributes and roles. It provides fine-grained control over authorization decisions by allowing policies to be defined in a flexible manner. In contrast, JSON Web Token (JWT) follows a token-centric approach. It encapsulates user and session information into a token, which can be used for authentication purposes. JWT does not provide the same level of fine-grained control over access control policies as Casbin.

  3. Casbin is Rule-based vs JWT is Algorithm-based: Casbin uses a rule-based approach to define access control policies. It allows policies to be written in a human-readable format, making it easier to manage and maintain. On the other hand, JSON Web Token (JWT) relies on algorithms for token signing and verification. JWT uses cryptographic algorithms such as HMAC, RSA, or ECDSA to ensure the integrity of the token. This algorithm-based approach provides a secure mechanism for authentication token generation and validation.

  4. Language Support: Casbin supports multiple programming languages such as Go, Java, Python, Node.js, etc., making it a versatile choice for implementing access control policies. It provides language-specific APIs and tools for easy integration. In contrast, JSON Web Token (JWT) is a language-agnostic standard. It can be used with any programming language that has support for cryptographic operations. JWT libraries and plugins are available for most popular programming languages.

  5. Scope of Usage: Casbin is primarily used for enforcing access control policies in applications, systems, or APIs. It provides fine-grained control over authorization decisions and allows for complex policy rules. JSON Web Token (JWT), on the other hand, is used for authentication and information exchange between parties. It is commonly used in scenarios where secure authentication and data exchange are required, such as single sign-on systems, microservices architectures, or API gateways.

  6. Centralized vs Distributed: Casbin can be used as a standalone library or integrated into existing applications. It provides a centralized approach to access control policy management, where policies are defined and enforced within the application or system. On the other hand, JSON Web Token (JWT) is a distributed mechanism. It allows authentication tokens to be generated by one party and verified by another party without the need for centralized policy management. JWT tokens can be used across different systems or applications, making it suitable for distributed environments.

In Summary, Casbin focuses on authorization policy enforcement with a rule-based approach, supporting multiple programming languages, while JWT is an algorithm-based token-centric authentication mechanism used for secure authentication and data exchange in distributed systems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token
Casbin
Casbin

JSON Web Token is an open standard that defines a compact and self-contained way for securely transmitting information between parties as a JSON object. This information can be verified and trusted because it is digitally signed.

In Casbin, an access control model is abstracted into a CONF file based on the PERM metamodel (Policy, Effect, Request, Matchers). So switching or upgrading the authorization mechanism for a project is just as simple as modifying a configuration. You can customize your own access control model by combining the available models.

compact;self-contained
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.7K
GitHub Stars
19.4K
GitHub Forks
374
GitHub Forks
1.7K
Stacks
1.8K
Stacks
39
Followers
367
Followers
78
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to JSON Web Token, Casbin?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope