StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Casbin vs Passport

Casbin vs Passport

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Passport
Passport
Stacks471
Followers368
Votes0
GitHub Stars23.5K
Forks1.2K
Casbin
Casbin
Stacks39
Followers78
Votes0
GitHub Stars19.4K
Forks1.7K

Casbin vs Passport: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown document, we will provide a comparison between Casbin and Passport, focusing on their key differences. Casbin and Passport are both popular authentication and authorization libraries used in web development.

  1. Data Model: Casbin and Passport differ in their data models. Casbin follows an access control model similar to ACL (Access Control List), where users, resources, and actions are defined with associated permissions. On the other hand, Passport uses a session-based approach, where user session data is stored on the server and utilized for authentication and authorization.

  2. Programming Language Support: Another significant difference between Casbin and Passport lies in the programming languages they support. Casbin is primarily designed for Golang applications and has extensive support in that ecosystem. Conversely, Passport is written in JavaScript and is widely used with Node.js applications.

  3. Usage: Casbin and Passport have different use cases and focuses. Casbin is mainly aimed at providing fine-grained access control and permission management. It allows for flexible policy management and enforcement mechanisms across a range of applications. In contrast, Passport is more focused on simplifying authentication processes, providing strategies for authentication methods like username and password, social logins, OAuth, etc.

  4. Integration: Casbin and Passport integrate with systems in different ways. Casbin supports integration with various frameworks, databases, and file systems, making it highly adaptable. It has plugins for popular frameworks like Gin, Echo, and Beego. Passport, being a Node.js library, integrates seamlessly with Express.js - a widely-used Node.js web application framework.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: The community and ecosystem surrounding Casbin and Passport also differ. Casbin has a smaller but rapidly growing community, with dedicated contributors actively maintaining the project. It provides comprehensive documentation and ongoing development support. Passport, on the other hand, has a larger and more established community due to its association with the Node.js ecosystem, resulting in a wide range of available resources, plugins, and third-party integrations.

  6. Scalability: When it comes to scalability, Casbin and Passport show contrasting features. Casbin is well-suited for large-scale applications and scenarios that require complex access control policies due to its flexible and extensible nature. It can efficiently handle large amounts of permission-related data and enforce policies in real-time. Passport, being designed for lightweight authentication purposes, may be more suitable for smaller-scale applications or projects that do not require highly granular access control.

In summary, Casbin and Passport differ in their data models, programming language support, usage focus, integration capabilities, community ecosystems, and scalability. These differences enable developers to choose the library that best suits their specific authentication and authorization needs in web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Passport, Casbin

Vaibhav
Vaibhav

Jul 17, 2020

Needs advice

Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?

As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?

220k views220k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Passport
Passport
Casbin
Casbin

It is authentication middleware for Node.js. Extremely flexible and modular, It can be unobtrusively dropped in to any Express-based web application. A comprehensive set of strategies support authentication using a username and password, Facebook, Twitter, and more.

In Casbin, an access control model is abstracted into a CONF file based on the PERM metamodel (Policy, Effect, Request, Matchers). So switching or upgrading the authorization mechanism for a project is just as simple as modifying a configuration. You can customize your own access control model by combining the available models.

Single sign-on with OpenID and OAuth; Easily handle success and failure
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
23.5K
GitHub Stars
19.4K
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
1.7K
Stacks
471
Stacks
39
Followers
368
Followers
78
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Vue.js
Vue.js
JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Passport, Casbin?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope