CasperJS vs Playwright

Overview

CasperJS

Stacks76

Followers120

Votes0

GitHub Stars7.2K

Forks972

Playwright

Stacks612

Followers586

Votes81

GitHub Stars79.0K

Forks4.8K

CasperJS vs Playwright: What are the differences?

Execution Environment: CasperJS is based on PhantomJS, whereas Playwright is based on Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit, providing the advantage of being more up-to-date with the latest browser technology.
API Support: Playwright offers a more extensive API support for browsers and testing scenarios, enabling developers to perform a wider range of actions compared to CasperJS.
Cross-Browser Compatibility: Playwright allows for cross-browser testing on Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit, giving users the flexibility to test their applications across multiple browsers seamlessly, which is not possible with CasperJS.
Asynchronous Operations: Playwright supports async/await functionality out of the box, making it easier to handle asynchronous operations and write more readable and maintainable code, unlike CasperJS which requires more effort to achieve the same functionality.
Maintenance and Updates: Playwright is actively maintained by Microsoft and has regular updates, ensuring that users have access to the latest features and improvements, while CasperJS, with its reliance on PhantomJS, may face challenges in keeping up with the evolving web technologies.
Community Support: Playwright has a strong community support backed by Microsoft, providing users with resources, documentation, and help forums, whereas CasperJS, being less actively developed, may have limited community support and resources available.

In Summary, Playwright offers better cross-browser compatibility, extensive API support, and asynchronous operations handling, along with strong maintenance and community support compared to CasperJS.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

CasperJS	Playwright
CasperJS is a browser navigation scripting & testing utility written in Javascript for PhantomJS or SlimerJS.	It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.
-	Node library; Headless supported; Enables cross-browser web automation; Improved automated UI testing
Statistics
GitHub Stars 7.2K	GitHub Stars 79.0K
GitHub Forks 972	GitHub Forks 4.8K
Stacks 76	Stacks 612
Followers 120	Followers 586
Votes 0	Votes 81
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 15 Cross browser 11 Open source 9 Test Runner with Playwright/test 7 Well documented 7 Promise based Cons 12 Less help 3 Node based 2 Does not execute outside of browser
Integrations
PhantomJS	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to CasperJS, Playwright?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Puppeteer

Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Related Comparisons

CasperJS vs Playwright: What are the differences?

Execution Environment: CasperJS is based on PhantomJS, whereas Playwright is based on Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit, providing the advantage of being more up-to-date with the latest browser technology.
API Support: Playwright offers a more extensive API support for browsers and testing scenarios, enabling developers to perform a wider range of actions compared to CasperJS.
Cross-Browser Compatibility: Playwright allows for cross-browser testing on Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit, giving users the flexibility to test their applications across multiple browsers seamlessly, which is not possible with CasperJS.
Asynchronous Operations: Playwright supports async/await functionality out of the box, making it easier to handle asynchronous operations and write more readable and maintainable code, unlike CasperJS which requires more effort to achieve the same functionality.
Maintenance and Updates: Playwright is actively maintained by Microsoft and has regular updates, ensuring that users have access to the latest features and improvements, while CasperJS, with its reliance on PhantomJS, may face challenges in keeping up with the evolving web technologies.
Community Support: Playwright has a strong community support backed by Microsoft, providing users with resources, documentation, and help forums, whereas CasperJS, being less actively developed, may have limited community support and resources available.

CasperJS vs Playwright

Overview