StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Operating Systems
  5. CentOS vs Cygwin

CentOS vs Cygwin

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cygwin
Cygwin
Stacks27
Followers27
Votes0
GitHub Stars23
Forks7
CentOS
CentOS
Stacks13.8K
Followers9.0K
Votes53

CentOS vs Cygwin: What are the differences?

  1. File System Access: CentOS is a Linux distribution, providing full access to the UNIX-like file system hierarchy. Users can navigate, create, edit, and delete files using command line tools and graphical interfaces. On the other hand, Cygwin is designed for Windows systems, allowing users to access Unix-like environments and tools. However, access to the Windows file system is also seamlessly integrated, enabling users to work with both file systems simultaneously.
  2. Package Management: CentOS utilizes the YUM (Yellowdog Updater, Modified) package manager to install, update, and remove software packages. It simplifies the process of managing dependencies and resolving conflicts. In contrast, Cygwin employs its setup program to install and update packages, offering a wide range of pre-compiled packages to enhance the functionalities of the base installation.
  3. Native OS Compatibility: CentOS is a standalone operating system, requiring a dedicated installation on hardware to function. It can be utilized as a server, workstation, or development platform based on user requirements. Conversely, Cygwin is a software tool that must be installed within a Windows environment. It adds a layer of compatibility between Windows and Unix-based applications without replacing the underlying operating system.
  4. Shell Environment: CentOS primarily uses the Bash shell by default, offering a powerful command line interface for system administrators and users. It supports scripting, automation, and customization of the environment through configuration files. In comparison, Cygwin also utilizes the Bash shell as its default, providing a similar experience to CentOS users by offering familiar commands and utilities.
  5. User Base: CentOS is widely used in enterprise environments, data centers, and cloud infrastructure due to its stability, long-term support, and community-driven development. It caters to businesses and organizations requiring a reliable and secure operating system for their infrastructure. On the other hand, Cygwin appeals to developers, power users, and individuals seeking Unix utilities on Windows systems. It serves as a bridge between different operating environments, enabling seamless integration of tools and workflows.
  6. Networking Capabilities: CentOS includes robust networking capabilities out of the box, allowing users to configure network interfaces, set up services like DNS, DHCP, and firewall rules effortlessly. It supports server roles like web server, database server, file server, etc., making it a versatile platform for networking tasks. In contrast, Cygwin focuses more on providing compatibility layers and tools for developers, overlooking advanced networking features found in dedicated server operating systems like CentOS.

In Summary, CentOS and Cygwin offer distinct approaches to integrating Unix-like functionalities on different operating systems, catering to diverse user needs and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Cygwin, CentOS

Jerome/Zen
Jerome/Zen

Software Engineer

Aug 2, 2020

Decided

Global familiarity, free, widely used, and as a debian distro feels more comfortable when rapidly switching between local macOS and remote command lines.

CentOS does boast quite a few security/stability improvements, however as a RHEL-based distro, differs quite significantly in the command line and suffers from slightly less frequent package updates. (Could be a good or bad thing depending on your use-case and if it is public facing)

271k views271k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Cygwin
Cygwin
CentOS
CentOS

It is a POSIX-compatible environment that runs natively on Microsoft Windows. Its goal is to allow programs of Unix-like systems to be recompiled and run natively on Windows with minimal source code modifications by providing them with the same underlying POSIX API they would expect in those systems.

The CentOS Project is a community-driven free software effort focused on delivering a robust open source ecosystem. For users, we offer a consistent manageable platform that suits a wide variety of deployments. For open source communities, we offer a solid, predictable base to build upon, along with extensive resources to build, test, release, and maintain their code.

A dynamic-link library; API compatibility layer; Color Depths
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
23
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
7
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
27
Stacks
13.8K
Followers
27
Followers
9.0K
Votes
0
Votes
53
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 16
    Stable
  • 9
    Reliable
  • 9
    Free to use
  • 6
    Good support
  • 6
    Has epel packages
Cons
  • 1
    Yum is a horrible package manager
Integrations
Linux Kernel
Linux Kernel
Linux
Linux
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Cygwin, CentOS?

Ubuntu

Ubuntu

Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning ‘humanity to others’. It also means ‘I am what I am because of who we all are’. The Ubuntu operating system brings the spirit of Ubuntu to the world of computers.

Debian

Debian

Debian systems currently use the Linux kernel or the FreeBSD kernel. Linux is a piece of software started by Linus Torvalds and supported by thousands of programmers worldwide. FreeBSD is an operating system including a kernel and other software.

Arch Linux

Arch Linux

A lightweight and flexible Linux distribution that tries to Keep It Simple.

Fedora

Fedora

Fedora is a Linux-based operating system that provides users with access to the latest free and open source software, in a stable, secure and easy to manage form. Fedora is the largest of many free software creations of the Fedora Project. Because of its predominance, the word "Fedora" is often used interchangeably to mean both the Fedora Project and the Fedora operating system.

Linux Mint

Linux Mint

The purpose of Linux Mint is to produce a modern, elegant and comfortable operating system which is both powerful and easy to use.

Linux

Linux

A clone of the operating system Unix, written from scratch by Linus Torvalds with assistance from a loosely-knit team of hackers across the Net. It aims towards POSIX and Single UNIX Specification compliance.

CoreOS

CoreOS

It is designed for security, consistency, and reliability. Instead of installing packages via yum or apt, it uses Linux containers to manage your services at a higher level of abstraction. A single service's code and all dependencies are packaged within a container that can be run on one or many machines.

Gentoo Linux

Gentoo Linux

It is a free operating system based on either Linux or FreeBSD that can be automatically optimized and customized for just about any application or need.

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux is a security-oriented, lightweight Linux distribution based on musl libc and busybox.

Manjaro

Manjaro

It is an accessible, friendly, open-source Linux distribution and community. Based on Arch Linux, it provides all the benefits of cutting-edge software combined with a focus on getting started quickly, automated tools to require less manual intervention, and help readily available when needed.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase