StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Monitoring Tools
  5. Centreon vs Munin

Centreon vs Munin

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Munin
Munin
Stacks71
Followers95
Votes10
GitHub Stars2.1K
Forks479
Centreon
Centreon
Stacks42
Followers84
Votes0
GitHub Stars136
Forks52

Centreon vs Munin: What are the differences?

## Introduction
Centreon and Munin are both popular monitoring tools used in the IT industry. Despite serving the same purpose, each tool has its unique features and capabilities. Below are the key differences between Centreon and Munin.

1. **Data Collection Methods**: Centreon uses SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) for data collection, providing a wide range of data points from various devices and systems. In contrast, Munin primarily focuses on monitoring local resources and services on a server through plugins, limiting its data collection scope compared to Centreon.

2. **User Interface**: Centreon offers a comprehensive web interface with customizable dashboards, detailed reports, and customizable views for different user roles. On the other hand, Munin has a simpler interface, displaying basic graphs and data with limited customization options, making it less suitable for organizations requiring advanced monitoring capabilities.

3. **Alerting and Notifications**: Centreon provides advanced alerting features, including real-time notifications via email, SMS, and integration with third-party applications like Slack and PagerDuty. Munin, while capable of generating alerts, lacks the robust notification options offered by Centreon, limiting its effectiveness in critical monitoring scenarios.

4. **Scalability and Performance**: Centreon is known for its scalability, capable of monitoring large IT infrastructures with thousands of devices and services efficiently. Munin, while suitable for small to medium-sized environments, may experience performance issues when scaling to monitor extensive or distributed infrastructures.

5. **Community Support and Documentation**: With a large community of users and contributors, Centreon benefits from extensive documentation, online forums, and plugins developed by the community, offering comprehensive support and resources for users. In comparison, Munin's community is smaller, resulting in potentially less diverse plugins and resources available for users seeking customization or specific monitoring requirements.

In Summary, Centreon offers a scalable, feature-rich monitoring solution with extensive data collection methods, advanced alerting capabilities, and superior community support, while Munin is a more straightforward tool focused on local resource monitoring with a simpler interface and limited scalability for smaller environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Munin, Centreon

vivek
vivek

Jun 8, 2020

Needs adviceonCentreonCentreonZabbixZabbixDatadogDatadog

My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!

795k views795k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Munin
Munin
Centreon
Centreon

Munin is a networked resource monitoring tool that can help analyze resource trends and "what just happened to kill our performance?" problems. It is designed to be very plug and play. A default installation provides a lot of graphs with almost no work.

It is a network, system, applicative supervision and monitoring tool. It is one of the most flexible and powerful monitoring softwares on the market; it is absolutely free and Open Souce.

-
Supervision of hybrid infrastructures, from one end to the other;Open and flexible architecture that fits your organization;Open-source solution, downloadable for free; The supervision of dynamic infrastructures, with ease
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.1K
GitHub Stars
136
GitHub Forks
479
GitHub Forks
52
Stacks
71
Stacks
42
Followers
95
Followers
84
Votes
10
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Good defaults
  • 2
    Adheres to traditional Linux standards
  • 2
    Alerts can trigger any command line program
  • 2
    Extremely fast to install
  • 1
    Easy to write custom plugins
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Amazon RDS
Amazon RDS
Amazon CloudFront
Amazon CloudFront
Amazon ElastiCache
Amazon ElastiCache
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Azure Active Directory
Azure Active Directory
Cassandra
Cassandra
Azure Storage
Azure Storage
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Azure Monitor
Azure Monitor
Azure SQL Database
Azure SQL Database

What are some alternatives to Munin, Centreon?

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Zabbix

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana