Checkstyle vs Pylint

Overview

Checkstyle

Stacks132

Followers107

Votes0

GitHub Stars8.7K

Forks3.9K

Pylint

Stacks873

Followers97

Votes17

Checkstyle vs Pylint: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Checkstyle and Pylint

Checkstyle and Pylint are both static code analysis tools that aim to identify and report code quality issues. However, there are several key differences between them.

Language Support: Checkstyle is primarily used for Java code analysis, while Pylint is mainly used for analyzing Python code. This difference in language support makes them suitable for different types of projects and programming languages.
Rule Sets: Checkstyle and Pylint have different sets of rules and configurations. Checkstyle allows users to define their own custom rule sets, providing flexibility in rule enforcement. On the other hand, Pylint provides a comprehensive default rule set for Python projects.
Rule Coverage: Checkstyle offers a wider range of code style and formatting rules that cover various aspects of code design and readability. Pylint, on the other hand, focuses more on enforcing coding conventions, identifying potential programming errors, and checking for code smells.
Integration: Checkstyle integrates well with popular Java development tools, such as build systems like Ant and Maven, making it easy to incorporate into the development workflow. Pylint, on the other hand, integrates well with Python development environments and editors like PyCharm, making it convenient for Python developers.
Extensibility: Checkstyle provides a flexible plugin system that allows users to extend its functionality and add custom checks. Pylint also supports some degree of extensibility through plugins, but the range of available plugins is more limited compared to Checkstyle.
Maturity and Community: Checkstyle has been around for a longer time and has a large and active community of users and contributors. This results in a mature and well-documented tool with a wide range of resources available. Pylint, although not as old as Checkstyle, also has a significant community and active development, ensuring continuous improvements and support for Python developers.

In summary, the key differences between Checkstyle and Pylint lie in their language support, rule sets, coverage, integration options, extensibility, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Checkstyle	Pylint
It is a development tool to help programmers write Java code that adheres to a coding standard. It automates the process of checking Java code to spare humans of this boring (but important) task. This makes it ideal for projects that want to enforce a coding standard.	It is a Python static code analysis tool which looks for programming errors, helps enforcing a coding standard, sniffs for code smells and offers simple refactoring suggestions.
-	Syntax Check;Style Check;Warnings
Statistics
GitHub Stars 8.7K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 3.9K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 132	Stacks 873
Followers 107	Followers 97
Votes 0	Votes 17
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 3 Command Line 2 Spell Check strings & comments 2 Code score & directions 2 Pre-commit checks 2 IDE Integration
Integrations
IntelliJ IDEA Java	FreeBSD Debian Vim Windows Mac OS X TextMate Visual Studio Komodo IDE Eclipse Visual Studio Code

What are some alternatives to Checkstyle , Pylint?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

Checkstyle vs Pylint: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Checkstyle and Pylint

Checkstyle and Pylint are both static code analysis tools that aim to identify and report code quality issues. However, there are several key differences between them.

Language Support: Checkstyle is primarily used for Java code analysis, while Pylint is mainly used for analyzing Python code. This difference in language support makes them suitable for different types of projects and programming languages.
Rule Sets: Checkstyle and Pylint have different sets of rules and configurations. Checkstyle allows users to define their own custom rule sets, providing flexibility in rule enforcement. On the other hand, Pylint provides a comprehensive default rule set for Python projects.
Rule Coverage: Checkstyle offers a wider range of code style and formatting rules that cover various aspects of code design and readability. Pylint, on the other hand, focuses more on enforcing coding conventions, identifying potential programming errors, and checking for code smells.
Integration: Checkstyle integrates well with popular Java development tools, such as build systems like Ant and Maven, making it easy to incorporate into the development workflow. Pylint, on the other hand, integrates well with Python development environments and editors like PyCharm, making it convenient for Python developers.
Extensibility: Checkstyle provides a flexible plugin system that allows users to extend its functionality and add custom checks. Pylint also supports some degree of extensibility through plugins, but the range of available plugins is more limited compared to Checkstyle.
Maturity and Community: Checkstyle has been around for a longer time and has a large and active community of users and contributors. This results in a mature and well-documented tool with a wide range of resources available. Pylint, although not as old as Checkstyle, also has a significant community and active development, ensuring continuous improvements and support for Python developers.

In summary, the key differences between Checkstyle and Pylint lie in their language support, rule sets, coverage, integration options, extensibility, and community support.