StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Checkstyle vs SonarLint

Checkstyle vs SonarLint

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Checkstyle
Checkstyle
Stacks132
Followers107
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.7K
Forks3.9K
SonarLint
SonarLint
Stacks175
Followers352
Votes16

Checkstyle vs SonarLint: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Checkstyle and SonarLint are two popular static code analysis tools used in software development. While they have some similarities, they also have key differences that make them distinct from each other.

1. Static Analysis Approach:

Checkstyle primarily focuses on checking the code against a set of predefined coding standards, guidelines, and conventions. It provides checks for code style, formatting, naming conventions, and potential bugs. Checkstyle operates by analyzing the source code without executing it.

On the other hand, SonarLint goes beyond simple coding standards and conventions. It performs a more in-depth analysis of the code to detect a broader range of issues, including but not limited to, bugs, vulnerabilities, code smells, and design flaws. SonarLint analyzes the code in real-time as you write it and provides feedback within your integrated development environment (IDE).

2. Integration and IDE Support:

Checkstyle can be integrated into different build tools and Continuous Integration (CI) processes. It supports a wide range of IDEs, such as Eclipse, IntelliJ IDEA, and NetBeans, providing plugins to enable code analysis and compliance checking within the IDE.

SonarLint, on the other hand, has more seamless integration with IDEs. Apart from supporting popular IDEs like Eclipse, IntelliJ IDEA, and Visual Studio, SonarLint provides native integrations and extensions specifically for these IDEs. This allows developers to receive instant feedback and fixes directly in their IDE, reducing the need to switch between different tools.

3. Rules and Customization:

Checkstyle comes with a set of predefined rulesets that cover a wide range of coding standards and conventions. Developers can choose which rules to include or exclude based on their project requirements. Customizing Checkstyle rules often involves editing XML configuration files.

In contrast, SonarLint provides a vast library of predefined rules covering various coding standards, best practices, and common issues. Additionally, developers can write custom rules based on their specific needs using SonarQube's rule engine. SonarLint supports rule customization at both project and global levels, providing flexibility to enforce specific coding practices.

4. Language Support:

Checkstyle supports a wide range of programming languages, including Java, C/C++, C#, Objective-C, XML, and many more. It is primarily focused on enforcing coding standards for code written in these languages.

SonarLint also supports multiple programming languages, including the ones mentioned for Checkstyle. However, it provides more extensive support for a variety of languages, such as JavaScript, TypeScript, PHP, Python, and Ruby. SonarLint employs language-specific analyzers to provide targeted code analysis and issue detection.

5. Community and Ecosystem:

Checkstyle has been around for many years, and it has a well-established community of contributors and users. The community actively maintains and updates the tool, ensuring continuous improvements and bug fixes. Additionally, Checkstyle integrates well with other development tools and build systems, making it an integral part of the Java ecosystem.

SonarLint, as part of the larger SonarSource ecosystem, benefits from an active and vibrant community of users and contributors. The SonarSource community actively maintains and enhances SonarLint, ensuring support for multiple programming languages and seamless integration with various IDEs and build systems.

6. Pricing and Licensing:

Checkstyle is an open-source tool released under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) version 2.1. It is free to use and distribute, even for commercial purposes. This makes Checkstyle an attractive choice, especially for organizations with budget constraints.

SonarLint, although it offers a free version with basic functionality, also provides commercial editions with additional features and capabilities. These commercial editions are part of the overall SonarSource product suite, and their pricing and licensing depend on the specific edition and deployment options.

In summary, Checkstyle primarily focuses on coding standards and style guidelines, while SonarLint goes beyond that by performing a comprehensive analysis for detecting bugs, vulnerabilities, and design flaws in real-time within the IDE. SonarLint also provides better IDE integration, offers a wider range of language support, and has a more extensive ecosystem. Additionally, Checkstyle is open-source with no licensing costs, while SonarLint has both free and commercial editions available.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Checkstyle
Checkstyle
SonarLint
SonarLint

It is a development tool to help programmers write Java code that adheres to a coding standard. It automates the process of checking Java code to spare humans of this boring (but important) task. This makes it ideal for projects that want to enforce a coding standard.

It is an IDE extension that helps you detect and fix quality issues as you write code. Like a spell checker, it squiggles flaws so that they can be fixed before committing code.

-
Bug detection;Instant feedback;Know what to do;Learn from your mistakes;Uncover old issues
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
132
Stacks
175
Followers
107
Followers
352
Votes
0
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 13
    IDE Integration
  • 3
    Free
Cons
  • 3
    Not Very User Friendly
  • 3
    Non contextual warnings
Integrations
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Java
Java
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Eclipse
Eclipse
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA

What are some alternatives to Checkstyle , SonarLint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana