StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Citrix Gateway vs Spring Security

Citrix Gateway vs Spring Security

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spring Security
Spring Security
Stacks559
Followers589
Votes6
GitHub Stars9.4K
Forks6.2K
Citrix Gateway
Citrix Gateway
Stacks16
Followers16
Votes0

Citrix Gateway vs Spring Security: What are the differences?

  1. Authentication Mechanism: Citrix Gateway primarily focuses on providing secure remote access to applications and data through various authentication mechanisms such as LDAP, RADIUS, SAML, and multi-factor authentication. On the other hand, Spring Security is a powerful and highly customizable authentication and access control framework for Java applications, providing features like form-based authentication, HTTP basic/digest authentication, and OAuth support.

  2. Single Sign-On (SSO) Capabilities: Citrix Gateway offers seamless single sign-on capabilities for users accessing multiple applications within the Citrix environment, enhancing user experience and productivity. In contrast, Spring Security provides support for integrating with various SSO protocols and technologies like OAuth, OpenID, and SAML to achieve single sign-on across different applications and services.

  3. Scalability and Load Balancing: Citrix Gateway excels in handling high volumes of traffic and ensuring scalability through features like load balancing and clustering, making it suitable for large enterprise deployments. Spring Security, while not a dedicated network gateway, can be integrated with load balancing solutions for distributing authentication and authorization requests across multiple servers to achieve scalability and high availability.

  4. Customization and Extensibility: Spring Security offers extensive customization and extensibility options through its robust API and configuration options, allowing developers to tailor the security aspects of their applications to specific requirements. Citrix Gateway, while providing a comprehensive set of security features, may have limitations in terms of customization compared to the flexibility offered by Spring Security.

  5. Compliance and Security Standards: Citrix Gateway is designed with a focus on meeting compliance requirements and adhering to industry security standards like GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS to ensure data protection and regulatory compliance. Spring Security, on the other hand, empowers developers to implement security best practices and standards within their applications to achieve compliance with regulations and security guidelines.

  6. Integration with Application Frameworks: Spring Security seamlessly integrates with popular Java frameworks like Spring Boot, Spring MVC, and Spring Cloud, providing a cohesive security layer for applications built on these frameworks. Citrix Gateway, while offering integration options for various application types, may require additional configurations and setup to work smoothly with specific application frameworks.

In Summary, Citrix Gateway and Spring Security differ in authentication mechanisms, single sign-on capabilities, scalability, customization, compliance standards, and integration with application frameworks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Spring Security, Citrix Gateway

sindhujasrivastava
sindhujasrivastava

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

I am working on building a platform in my company that will provide a single sign on to all of the internal products to the customer. To do that we need to build an Authorisation server to comply with the OIDC protocol. Earlier we had built the Auth server using the Spring Security OAuth project but since in Spring Security 5.x it is no longer supported we are planning to get over with it as well. Below are the 2 options that I was considering to replace the Spring Auth Server.

  1. Keycloak
  2. Okta
  3. Auth0 Please advise which one to use.
258k views258k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spring Security
Spring Security
Citrix Gateway
Citrix Gateway

It is a framework that focuses on providing both authentication and authorization to Java applications. The real power of Spring Security is found in how easily it can be extended to meet custom requirements.

It is a customer-managed solution that can be deployed on premises or on any public cloud, such as AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud Platform. It provides users with secure access and single sign-on to all the virtual, SaaS and web applications they need to be productive.

Comprehensive; Servlet API integration; Protection against attacks
Customer-managed solution; Can be deployed on premises or on any public cloud; Secure access and single sign-on
Statistics
GitHub Stars
9.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
6.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
559
Stacks
16
Followers
589
Followers
16
Votes
6
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Java integration
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Spring MVC
Spring MVC
Google Cloud Platform
Google Cloud Platform

What are some alternatives to Spring Security, Citrix Gateway?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope