StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Operating Systems
  5. CoreOS vs Ubuntu

CoreOS vs Ubuntu

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CoreOS
CoreOS
Stacks217
Followers297
Votes44
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Stacks80.4K
Followers59.1K
Votes468

CoreOS vs Ubuntu: What are the differences?

Key differences between CoreOS and Ubuntu

CoreOS and Ubuntu are two popular operating systems used in the world of containerization and virtualization. While both systems offer similar functionalities, there are distinct differences that set them apart. Let's explore these differences:

  1. Package Management: One major difference between CoreOS and Ubuntu is their method of package management. CoreOS uses a minimalistic package manager called "Container Linux" that focuses on providing only the necessary components for running containers. On the other hand, Ubuntu uses the widely-used Advanced Package Tool (APT) for package management, providing a broader range of software packages.

  2. Update and Rollback Management: CoreOS is known for its automatic and seamless system update mechanism. It uses a concept called "Container Linux Update Operator" that enables automatic updates without requiring manual intervention. Ubuntu, while also providing automatic updates, may require manual intervention during the update process. Additionally, CoreOS boasts a built-in rollback mechanism, allowing users to easily revert to a previous system state in case of issues, whereas Ubuntu lacks this feature.

  3. Focus on Containerization: CoreOS is designed from the ground up with a strong focus on containerization technologies and container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. It provides out-of-the-box compatibility with container runtimes like Docker and rkt, making it a preferred choice for container deployments. Ubuntu, while also capable of running containers, has a broader usage scope beyond just containerization.

  4. System Architecture: Another key difference lies in the underlying system architecture. CoreOS follows a minimalist approach, providing a lightweight and stripped-down operating system optimized for container workloads. Ubuntu, on the other hand, offers a full-fledged operating system with a comparatively larger footprint in terms of disk space and RAM usage.

  5. Community and Support: Ubuntu enjoys a larger and more well-established community, offering extensive support and a wealth of documentation. This makes it easier for users to find assistance and resources. While CoreOS also has a community and support system in place, it may not be as extensive or widely known as Ubuntu's.

In summary, CoreOS and Ubuntu differ in package management, update and rollback management, focus on containerization, system architecture, and community support. These differences make each operating system suitable for specific use cases and requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on CoreOS, Ubuntu

Michaël
Michaël

Fullstack Dev at Synovo Group

Nov 18, 2020

Decided

Ubuntu always let people do what they want to do, it pushes its users to know what they are doing, what they want and helps them learn what they ignore.

Ubuntu is simple, works out-of-the-box after installation and has a incredibly huge community behind.

Ubuntu is lightweight and open, in the way, that the user has access to free AND efficient applications (most of the time, without ads) and, even if learning its folder structure is challenging, once done, you are really able to call yourself "someone who knows what is in your computer".

Windows, in comparison, is heavy, tends to make decision for you and always enable tracking application by default. grr

It has a simple user interface, of course, but on the stability point of view, it is hard to compete with something simpler (even with less features).

Personal preference : I prefer something simple that works 99% of the time, than a full-featured auto-magical system that works 50% of the time (and ask if the good version of the driver is really installed...)

46.7k views46.7k
Comments
Jerome/Zen
Jerome/Zen

Software Engineer

Aug 2, 2020

Decided

Global familiarity, free, widely used, and as a debian distro feels more comfortable when rapidly switching between local macOS and remote command lines.

CentOS does boast quite a few security/stability improvements, however as a RHEL-based distro, differs quite significantly in the command line and suffers from slightly less frequent package updates. (Could be a good or bad thing depending on your use-case and if it is public facing)

271k views271k
Comments
Simon
Simon

Developer Advocate at k6 / Load Impact

Mar 7, 2020

Decided

At the moment of the decision, my desktop was the primary place I did work. Due to this, I can't have it blow up on me while I work. While Arch is interesting and powerful, Ubuntu offers (at least for me) a lot more stability and lets me focus on other things than maintaining my own OS installation.

299k views299k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

CoreOS
CoreOS
Ubuntu
Ubuntu

It is designed for security, consistency, and reliability. Instead of installing packages via yum or apt, it uses Linux containers to manage your services at a higher level of abstraction. A single service's code and all dependencies are packaged within a container that can be run on one or many machines.

Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning ‘humanity to others’. It also means ‘I am what I am because of who we all are’. The Ubuntu operating system brings the spirit of Ubuntu to the world of computers.

Great to develop; Test; Operate
-
Statistics
Stacks
217
Stacks
80.4K
Followers
297
Followers
59.1K
Votes
44
Votes
468
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 20
    Container management
  • 15
    Lightweight
  • 9
    Systemd
Cons
  • 3
    End-of-lifed
Pros
  • 230
    Free to use
  • 96
    Easy setup for testing discord bot
  • 57
    Gateway Linux Distro
  • 54
    Simple interface
  • 9
    Don't need driver installation in most cases
Cons
  • 5
    Demanding system requirements
  • 4
    Adds overhead and unnecessary complexity over Debian
  • 2
    Snapd installed by default
  • 1
    Systemd

What are some alternatives to CoreOS, Ubuntu?

Debian

Debian

Debian systems currently use the Linux kernel or the FreeBSD kernel. Linux is a piece of software started by Linus Torvalds and supported by thousands of programmers worldwide. FreeBSD is an operating system including a kernel and other software.

Arch Linux

Arch Linux

A lightweight and flexible Linux distribution that tries to Keep It Simple.

Fedora

Fedora

Fedora is a Linux-based operating system that provides users with access to the latest free and open source software, in a stable, secure and easy to manage form. Fedora is the largest of many free software creations of the Fedora Project. Because of its predominance, the word "Fedora" is often used interchangeably to mean both the Fedora Project and the Fedora operating system.

Linux Mint

Linux Mint

The purpose of Linux Mint is to produce a modern, elegant and comfortable operating system which is both powerful and easy to use.

CentOS

CentOS

The CentOS Project is a community-driven free software effort focused on delivering a robust open source ecosystem. For users, we offer a consistent manageable platform that suits a wide variety of deployments. For open source communities, we offer a solid, predictable base to build upon, along with extensive resources to build, test, release, and maintain their code.

Linux

Linux

A clone of the operating system Unix, written from scratch by Linus Torvalds with assistance from a loosely-knit team of hackers across the Net. It aims towards POSIX and Single UNIX Specification compliance.

Gentoo Linux

Gentoo Linux

It is a free operating system based on either Linux or FreeBSD that can be automatically optimized and customized for just about any application or need.

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux

Alpine Linux is a security-oriented, lightweight Linux distribution based on musl libc and busybox.

Manjaro

Manjaro

It is an accessible, friendly, open-source Linux distribution and community. Based on Arch Linux, it provides all the benefits of cutting-edge software combined with a focus on getting started quickly, automated tools to require less manual intervention, and help readily available when needed.

FreeBSD

FreeBSD

An operating system for a variety of platforms which focuses on features, speed, and stability. It is derived from BSD, the version of UNIX® developed at the University of California, Berkeley. It is developed and maintained by a large community.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase