StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Coverage
  4. Code Coverage
  5. Coveralls vs Istanbul

Coveralls vs Istanbul

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Coveralls
Coveralls
Stacks1.7K
Followers278
Votes68
Istanbul
Istanbul
Stacks785
Followers8
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.7K
Forks780

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Coveralls
Coveralls
Istanbul
Istanbul

Coveralls works with your CI server and sifts through your coverage data to find issues you didn't even know you had before they become a problem. Free for open source, pro accounts for private repos, instant sign up with GitHub OAuth.

It is a JS code coverage tool that computes statement, line, function and branch coverage with module loader hooks to transparently add coverage when running tests. Supports all JS coverage use cases including unit tests, server side functional tests and browser tests. Built for scale.

Repository Coverage Statistics;Individual File Coverage Reports;Line By Line Coverage;Repository Overview
All-javascript instrumentation library that tracks statement, branch, and function coverage; Module loader hooks to instrument code on the fly; Command line tools to run node unit tests "with coverage turned on" and no cooperation whatsoever from the test runner; Multiple report formats: HTML, LCOV, Cobertura and more; Ability to use as middleware when serving JS files that need to be tested on the browser; Can be used on the command line as well as a library; Based on the awesome esprima parser and the equally awesome escodegen code generator; Well-tested on node (prev, current and next versions) and the browser (instrumentation library only)
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
780
Stacks
1.7K
Stacks
785
Followers
278
Followers
8
Votes
68
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 45
    Free for public repositories
  • 13
    Code coverage
  • 7
    Ease of integration
  • 2
    More stable than Codecov
  • 1
    Combines coverage from multiple/parallel test runs
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Travis CI
Travis CI
CircleCI
CircleCI
Semaphore
Semaphore
Jenkins
Jenkins
Codeship
Codeship
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Coveralls, Istanbul?

Codecov

Codecov

Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security.

uberalls

uberalls

Code coverage metric storage service. Provide coverage metrics on differentials with Phabricator and Jenkins, just like Coveralls does for GitHub and TravisCI.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana