StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Cucumber vs Google Test

Cucumber vs Google Test

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cucumber
Cucumber
Stacks1.4K
Followers927
Votes36
Google Test
Google Test
Stacks16
Followers31
Votes0
GitHub Stars37.4K
Forks10.6K

Cucumber vs Google Test: What are the differences?

  1. 1. Architecture: The key difference between Cucumber and Google Test lies in their architecture. Cucumber follows a behavior-driven development approach, utilizing a domain-specific language (DSL) called Gherkin to write high-level acceptance tests in a human-readable format. On the other hand, Google Test is a testing framework for C++ that follows a traditional unit testing approach, focusing on writing and executing low-level tests for individual components.

  2. 2. Language Compatibility: Cucumber primarily targets testing the behavior of software written in multiple programming languages, including Ruby, Java, JavaScript, etc. It can interact with the system under test using various automation frameworks. In contrast, Google Test is specifically designed for testing C++ code and does not provide direct support for testing other programming languages.

  3. 3. Test Organization: Cucumber organizes tests in a hierarchical structure known as features, scenarios, and steps. Features represent high-level functionalities while scenarios define specific test cases. Steps are the individual actions or assertions inside each scenario. Google Test, on the other hand, organizes tests into test cases and test suites, focusing on organizing and executing low-level unit tests.

  4. 4. Test Execution: Cucumber tests are typically executed using a separate test runner, such as Cucumber.js or Cucumber-JVM, which interprets the Gherkin syntax and orchestrates the execution of step definitions. Google Test, however, provides its own test runner, which can be used to execute the C++ unit tests without the need for additional frameworks.

  5. 5. Test Output: Cucumber produces test results in a textual format, usually in the form of reports or logs that highlight the passed or failed scenarios and steps. It emphasizes clear communication of the test's intent and behavior. In contrast, Google Test provides a detailed output in both a human-readable format and an XML format, including information on test failures, test durations, and other metrics.

  6. 6. Test Double Integration: Cucumber supports the integration of various test doubles, such as mocks and stubs, to simulate dependencies in the system under test. This enables behavior verification and isolation of units for testing. Google Test also supports test doubles through its mocking framework, Google Mock, allowing developers to create mocks and partial mocks for testing C++ classes.

In Summary, Cucumber focuses on behavior-driven development, while Google Test is dedicated to unit testing C++ code. Cucumber is language-agnostic, compatible with multiple programming languages, and emphasizes test organization in features and scenarios. On the other hand, Google Test is specific to C++, provides its own test runner, and offers detailed test output and test double integration through Google Mock.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Cucumber
Cucumber
Google Test
Google Test

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

It is a unit testing library for the C++ programming language, based on the xUnit architecture. The library is released under the BSD 3-clause license. It can be compiled for a variety of POSIX and Windows platforms, allowing unit-testing of C sources as well as C++ with minimal source modification.

-
An xUnit test framework; Test discovery; A rich set of assertions; User-defined assertions; Death tests; Fatal and non-fatal failures; Value-parameterized tests; Type-parameterized tests; Various options for running the tests; XML test report generation
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
37.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
10.6K
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
16
Followers
927
Followers
31
Votes
36
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 20
    Simple Syntax
  • 8
    Simple usage
  • 5
    Huge community
  • 3
    Nice report
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Linux
Linux
PlatformIO
PlatformIO
Windows
Windows
C++
C++
Mac OS X
Mac OS X
Cygwin
Cygwin

What are some alternatives to Cucumber, Google Test?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Codeception

Codeception

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana