StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. DID vs Keycloak

DID vs Keycloak

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Keycloak
Keycloak
Stacks783
Followers1.3K
Votes102
DID
DID
Stacks21
Followers26
Votes0

DID vs Keycloak: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In the world of authentication and access control, two popular technologies are Decentralized Identifiers (DID) and Keycloak. While they both serve the purpose of providing secure and reliable user authentication, there are several key differences between them. In this article, we will explore these differences in detail.

  1. Authentication Approach: DID is a decentralized approach to authentication, where each user has their own unique identifier that is not controlled by a centralized authority. On the other hand, Keycloak is a centralized identity and access management tool that uses standard protocols like OAuth2 and OpenID Connect for authentication.

  2. Scalability and Flexibility: DID allows for a highly scalable and flexible authentication system, as each user has their own DID that can be used across multiple platforms and applications. Keycloak, on the other hand, provides a centralized solution that may be more suitable for smaller-scale applications or organizations that require strict control over user authentication.

  3. Privacy and Control: With DID, users have more control over their personal data and can choose what information they want to share with others. Keycloak, being a centralized system, may require users to provide more personal information and rely on the organization's policies for data privacy and control.

  4. Interoperability: DID offers interoperability by allowing users to authenticate across different systems and applications using their DIDs. Keycloak, with its standardized protocols, also provides interoperability but may require more configuration and integration efforts.

  5. Community and Support: DID is a relatively new technology and may have a smaller community and support compared to Keycloak, which has been in development for a longer time and has a larger user base and community. Keycloak offers extensive documentation, forums, and support channels to assist developers and administrators.

  6. Customization and Extensibility: Keycloak provides various extensions and plugins that can be used to customize and extend its functionality according to specific requirements. DID, being a decentralized approach, may have limited options for customization and extensibility.

In summary, the key differences between DID and Keycloak lie in the authentication approach, scalability and flexibility, privacy and control, interoperability, community and support, and customization and extensibility. DID focuses on decentralization and user control, while Keycloak offers a centralized and customizable solution with a larger community and support base.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Keycloak, DID

sindhujasrivastava
sindhujasrivastava

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

I am working on building a platform in my company that will provide a single sign on to all of the internal products to the customer. To do that we need to build an Authorisation server to comply with the OIDC protocol. Earlier we had built the Auth server using the Spring Security OAuth project but since in Spring Security 5.x it is no longer supported we are planning to get over with it as well. Below are the 2 options that I was considering to replace the Spring Auth Server.

  1. Keycloak
  2. Okta
  3. Auth0 Please advise which one to use.
258k views258k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Keycloak
Keycloak
DID
DID

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

It is an Identity Provider that can be used for web and apps. Users are authenticated by verifying access to an email address or a securely stored private key.

-
Single-sign-on; SSO; Authentication; API; Web
Statistics
Stacks
783
Stacks
21
Followers
1.3K
Followers
26
Votes
102
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 33
    It's a open source solution
  • 24
    Supports multiple identity provider
  • 17
    OpenID and SAML support
  • 12
    Easy customisation
  • 10
    JSON web token
Cons
  • 7
    Okta
  • 6
    Poor client side documentation
  • 5
    Lack of Code examples for client side
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Node.js
Node.js
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Elixir
Elixir
Phoenix Framework
Phoenix Framework
OpenID Connect
OpenID Connect

What are some alternatives to Keycloak, DID?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope