StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. DID vs OpenID Connect

DID vs OpenID Connect

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OpenID Connect
OpenID Connect
Stacks234
Followers133
Votes0
DID
DID
Stacks21
Followers26
Votes0

DID vs OpenID Connect: What are the differences?

Introduction

DID (Decentralized Identifiers) and OpenID Connect are both technologies related to digital identity and authentication. While they have overlapping functionalities, there are key differences between the two that distinguish their use cases and implementation.

  1. DID: Decentralized Identifiers are persistent identifiers that are globally unique and self-sovereign. They are designed to give individuals control over their digital identity and allow interoperability across different systems. DIDs are typically stored on a blockchain or distributed ledger technology, ensuring immutability and security. They enable verifiable claims and provide a foundation for digital trust ecosystems.

  2. OpenID Connect: OpenID Connect is an authentication layer built on top of the OAuth 2.0 protocol. It allows users to authenticate with an identity provider (IdP) and obtain an access token that can be used to access protected resources. OpenID Connect provides user identity information in the form of ID tokens, which contain claims about the user. These tokens are digitally signed by the IdP and can be used by relying parties to verify the authenticity of the user's identity.

  3. DID vs OpenID Connect: One of the fundamental differences between DID and OpenID Connect lies in the concept of decentralization. DIDs are decentralized identifiers that are not owned or controlled by any central authority, giving individuals full control over their identity. On the other hand, OpenID Connect relies on a centralized identity provider to authenticate users, which introduces a level of trust and dependency on the provider.

  4. DID: DIDs are designed to support self-sovereign identity, meaning individuals have complete control over their identity data and can selectively disclose it as needed. This enables privacy and minimizes the risk of personal data being mishandled or exploited. In contrast, OpenID Connect involves sharing identity information with a centralized identity provider, which may raise privacy concerns.

  5. OpenID Connect: OpenID Connect focuses on providing a seamless and user-friendly authentication experience. It leverages well-known identity providers, such as Google or Facebook, allowing users to use their existing accounts to authenticate with different applications. DIDs, on the other hand, do not mandate any specific identity provider and provide a more flexible framework for identity management.

  6. DID vs OpenID Connect: DIDs are designed to support interoperability across different systems and domains. They are not tied to a specific technology or platform, making it easier to integrate with diverse ecosystems. OpenID Connect, while enabling cross-application authentication, relies on specific protocols and technologies, which may limit its interoperability in certain contexts.

In summary, DID and OpenID Connect differ in their approach to decentralization, control over identity, privacy, authentication experience, flexibility, and interoperability. DID focuses on self-sovereign identity, decentralized control, and interoperability, while OpenID Connect emphasizes seamless authentication with centralized identity providers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenID Connect
OpenID Connect
DID
DID

It is a simple identity layer on top of the OAuth 2.0 protocol. It allows Clients to verify the identity of the End-User based on the authentication performed by an Authorization Server, as well as to obtain basic profile information about the End-User in an interoperable and REST-like manner.

It is an Identity Provider that can be used for web and apps. Users are authenticated by verifying access to an email address or a securely stored private key.

-
Single-sign-on; SSO; Authentication; API; Web
Statistics
Stacks
234
Stacks
21
Followers
133
Followers
26
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token
Spring Security
Spring Security
OAuth2
OAuth2
Node.js
Node.js
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Elixir
Elixir
Phoenix Framework
Phoenix Framework

What are some alternatives to OpenID Connect, DID?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope