StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Containers As A Service
  5. Docker Cloud vs Joyent Triton

Docker Cloud vs Joyent Triton

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Joyent Triton
Joyent Triton
Stacks19
Followers21
Votes0
Docker Cloud
Docker Cloud
Stacks78
Followers127
Votes11

Docker Cloud vs Joyent Triton: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will outline the key differences between Docker Cloud and Joyent Triton for a better understanding of their unique features in the context of container orchestration and management.

  1. Deployment Approach: Docker Cloud is a platform as a service (PaaS) solution that enables developers to deploy, manage, and scale containerized applications using Docker technology, which simplifies the deployment process significantly. On the other hand, Joyent Triton is an infrastructure as a service (IaaS) solution that provides bare-metal performance and allows users to run containers directly on virtual machines or physical servers, offering more control over the deployment environment.

  2. Networking Capabilities: Docker Cloud comes with built-in support for Docker networking, allowing users to create and manage networks for their containerized applications. In contrast, Joyent Triton offers a software-defined networking solution that automates network configuration and offers advanced features like virtual private cloud (VPC) and load balancing, enhancing the network capabilities beyond traditional container networking.

  3. Storage Options: Docker Cloud provides easy integration with various storage solutions, such as Docker Volumes, allowing users to manage persistent data for their containers. In contrast, Joyent Triton offers ZFS-based storage capabilities, providing features like data deduplication, compression, and snapshots, which can enhance data management and protection for containerized workloads.

  4. Multi-Cloud Support: Docker Cloud offers multi-cloud support, allowing users to deploy and manage containers across different cloud providers or on-premises infrastructure, ensuring flexibility and portability for containerized applications. Joyent Triton, on the other hand, focuses on providing a seamless experience for running containers on its own cloud platform, leveraging its proprietary technology for optimized performance and security.

  5. Container Orchestration: Docker Cloud provides integrated support for Docker Swarm, enabling users to manage clusters of Docker hosts and orchestrate container deployment and scaling efficiently. In contrast, Joyent Triton offers native support for container orchestration through its Triton Elastic Container Service (ECS), which leverages Triton's underlying technology to provide auto-scaling, self-healing, and high availability features for containerized workloads.

  6. Security Features: Docker Cloud offers basic security features like user access control and secure networking options, but if more advanced security features are required, additional tools or integrations may be needed. In comparison, Joyent Triton provides robust security features out of the box, including hardware-level isolation, encryption at rest, and compliance certifications, making it a suitable choice for organizations with strict security requirements.

In Summary, the key differences between Docker Cloud and Joyent Triton lie in their deployment approach, networking capabilities, storage options, multi-cloud support, container orchestration, and security features, catering to different needs and preferences in the container management landscape.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Joyent Triton
Joyent Triton
Docker Cloud
Docker Cloud

Simple and proven. Securely deploy and operate containers with bare metal speed on container-native infrastructure, your cloud or ours.

Docker Cloud is the best way to deploy and manage Dockerized applications. Docker Cloud makes it easy for new Docker users to manage and deploy the full spectrum of applications, from single container apps to distributed microservices stacks, to any cloud or on-premises infrastructure.

Bare metal performance;Container-native networking;Container-native networking;Container introspection;Production-grade security;Dynamic utilization
Simplify Docker Provisioning;Deploy Apps Anywhere;Automate Your Developer Workflows;Manage Apps Anywhere
Statistics
Stacks
19
Stacks
78
Followers
21
Followers
127
Votes
0
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 9
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Seamless transition from docker compose
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Joyent Triton, Docker Cloud?

Amazon EC2 Container Service

Amazon EC2 Container Service

Amazon EC2 Container Service lets you launch and stop container-enabled applications with simple API calls, allows you to query the state of your cluster from a centralized service, and gives you access to many familiar Amazon EC2 features like security groups, EBS volumes and IAM roles.

Google Kubernetes Engine

Google Kubernetes Engine

Container Engine takes care of provisioning and maintaining the underlying virtual machine cluster, scaling your application, and operational logistics like logging, monitoring, and health management.

Containerum

Containerum

Containerum is built to aid cluster management, teamwork and resource allocation. Containerum runs on top of any Kubernetes cluster and provides a friendly Web UI for cluster management.

Azure Container Service

Azure Container Service

Azure Container Service optimizes the configuration of popular open source tools and technologies specifically for Azure. You get an open solution that offers portability for both your containers and your application configuration. You select the size, the number of hosts, and choice of orchestrator tools, and Container Service handles everything else.

Amazon EKS

Amazon EKS

Amazon Elastic Container Service for Kubernetes (Amazon EKS) is a managed service that makes it easy for you to run Kubernetes on AWS without needing to install and operate your own Kubernetes clusters.

instainer

instainer

InstaDocker is a Docker container hosting service which allows run any Docker container on the cloud instantly.

Docker Datacenter

Docker Datacenter

Docker Datacenter is an integrated solution including open source and commercial software, the integrations between them, full Docker API support, validated configurations and commercial support for your Docker Datacenter environment.

DCHQ

DCHQ

DCHQ delivers enterprise discipline to Linux Containers application lifecycle management. Available in hosted and on-prem versions, DCHQ provides the most advanced application composition framework extending Docker Compose through environment variable bindings across images, BASH script plug-ins that can be invoked at request time and post-provision and support for clustering for high availability across multiple hosts and auto-scaling.

Supergiant

Supergiant

Supergiant is a container management platform built on top of Kubernetes. Supergiant makes it easy to deploy and manage faster, and it reduces hardware expenses. Packing algorithm efficiently matches your overall CPU and RAM needs.

AWS Fargate

AWS Fargate

AWS Fargate is a technology for Amazon ECS and EKS* that allows you to run containers without having to manage servers or clusters. With AWS Fargate, you no longer have to provision, configure, and scale clusters of virtual machines to run containers.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana