StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. .NET Core vs Next.js

.NET Core vs Next.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K
.NET Core
.NET Core
Stacks7.0K
Followers2.6K
Votes155
GitHub Stars21.7K
Forks4.9K

.NET Core vs Next.js: What are the differences?

.NET Core is a cross-platform, open-source framework developed by Microsoft, while Next.js is a framework built on top of React for developing server-rendered applications. Both frameworks have their own unique features and characteristics.
  1. Deployment and Hosting: The deployment and hosting process differs for .NET Core and Next.js. In .NET Core, the application can be hosted on a Windows, Linux, or macOS server using IIS or any other web server. On the other hand, Next.js applications are typically deployed on cloud platforms like Vercel, Netlify, or AWS.

  2. Language and Technology Stack: .NET Core primarily uses C# as the programming language, and it has a broad ecosystem with support for various libraries and frameworks. Next.js, on the other hand, uses JavaScript or TypeScript for development and relies heavily on React and its ecosystem of libraries.

  3. Server-Side Rendering: Next.js provides built-in server-side rendering (SSR) capabilities, which allows rendering the initial HTML on the server before sending it to the client. .NET Core, by default, follows a traditional client-server architecture, where the server processes requests and returns HTML or JSON data to the client.

  4. Routing and Routing Configuration: The routing mechanisms differ in .NET Core and Next.js. In .NET Core, routing is typically configured using route templates in the startup file or through attributes on controller actions. Next.js, on the other hand, provides file-based routing, where the file and folder structure determines the routes.

  5. Platform-specific Limitations: .NET Core has better support for Windows-specific functionality and libraries, making it a suitable choice for Windows-specific applications. Next.js, being built on top of React, enjoys the benefits and capabilities provided by the React ecosystem, but may have limitations when it comes to accessing certain platform-specific features.

  6. Community and Support: Both .NET Core and Next.js have active communities and good support from their respective development teams. However, .NET Core benefits from being a Microsoft-backed framework with extensive documentation and resources available. Next.js, on the other hand, has a strong community of React developers and benefits from the vibrant React ecosystem.

In summary, .NET Core and Next.js differ in terms of deployment and hosting, language and technology stack, server-side rendering capabilities, routing mechanisms, platform-specific limitations, and community and support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Next.js, .NET Core

Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous

Dec 16, 2019

Review

There has been a lot of buzz around having PostgreSQL for ASP.NET Core 3.1 web apps. But Configuring Identity Server 4 with PostgreSQL is a real challenge. I've made a simple video to configure the ASP.NET Core 3.1 based Web application that uses AngualrJS as front end with Single Page App capabilities with Identity Server 4 talking to the PostgreSQL database. Check out this Video tutorial on how to do that in detail http://bit.ly/2EkotL5 You can access the entire code here on github http://bit.ly/35okpFj

210k views210k
Comments
Jakub
Jakub

Jan 2, 2020

Decided

I was researching multiple high performance, concurent//parallel languages for the needs of authentication and authorization server, to be built on microservice architecture and Linux OS. Node.js with its asynchronous behavior and event loop suits the case best. Python Django & Flash turns to be slower and .NET Core & Framework wasn't the best choice for the Linux environment at the time (summer 2018).

I also tested Go lang and Rust, although they didn't meet the quick prototyping criteria as both languages are young and lacking libraries or battle-tested ORM.

377k views377k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Next.js
Next.js
.NET Core
.NET Core

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

Cross-platform (supporting Windows, macOS, and Linux) and can be used to build device, cloud, and IoT applications.

Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Cross-platform; Consistent across architectures; Command-line tools; Flexible deployment; Compatible with .NET Framework, Xamarin and Mono, via .NET Standard; Open source; Supported by Microsoft
Statistics
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Stars
21.7K
GitHub Forks
29.7K
GitHub Forks
4.9K
Stacks
8.0K
Stacks
7.0K
Followers
5.1K
Followers
2.6K
Votes
330
Votes
155
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Pros
  • 30
    Perfect to do any backend ( and a fast frontend) stuff
  • 27
    Fast
  • 26
    Cross-platform
  • 25
    Great performance
  • 18
    All Platform (Mac, Linux, Windows)
Integrations
React
React
Linux
Linux
C#
C#
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Sublime Text
Sublime Text
.NET
.NET
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
Vim
Vim
Visual Basic
Visual Basic
F#
F#

What are some alternatives to Next.js, .NET Core?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase